Skip to playerSkip to main content
“WHEN I SAID THEY ARE ALLOWED, I WAS REFERRING TO LEADING QUESTIONS”

Defense counsel Atty. Kristine Ferrer clarified her previous “they are allowed” remark, saying she was referring specifically to leading questions, not to misleading questions. Ferrer explained that the August 12, 2026 journal showed she had asked a leading question before prosecution counsel Atty. Lorna Kapunan objected. She also said that the objection was improper at the time. (Video courtesy of Senate of the Philippines)

Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! -
https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin

Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin

#VPSaraOnTrial
#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Your Honor.
00:01You may proceed, Attorney May, or rather, Attorney Christine.
00:04Yes, Your Honor.
00:06Yes, Your Honor.
00:07Before I start with my cross-examination, just to put the record straight, Your Honor,
00:13when I said they are allowed, I was referring to leading questions, Your Honor,
00:18because the journal dated August 12, 2019, would show that I was indeed asking a leading question
00:26before Attorney Kapunan objected, Your Honor.
00:29So, if we take a look at it, with all due respect, the objection was even improper at that time,
00:36Your Honor.
00:37But I want that issue to be closed.
00:40That was similarly pointed out by the presiding officer, Counsel.
00:42Thank you, Your Honor.

Recommended