Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 week ago
Supreme Court Justice Prasanna Varale highlighted concerns over the prioritization of public funds, drawing a comparison between the budget allocated for the upcoming Kumbh Mela in Nashik and the financial resources available for government schools. Speaking about the closure of Marathi-medium schools, Justice Varale noted that allocating even 0.1 percent of the projected 32,000 to 34,000 crore rupees Kumbh Mela expenditure—approximately 32 crore rupees—could have prevented the shutdown of around 100 to 125 Marathi-medium schools. He expressed concern regarding shrinking education budgets despite a rise in student enrollment, pointing to poor infrastructure and safety issues in rural and government institutions, including ashramshalas. Responding to the comments, reporter Anisha Mathur noted that statements made by judges at private events hold no legal bearing on the government. She further referenced prior court scrutiny where state governments cited budget constraints when questioned on underfunding for child protection, education, and women safety schemes, emphasizing that education accounts for less than 13 percent of the annual budget.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:02Amidst a growing national focus on the state of primary education, a remark from the Supreme
00:07Court Justice Prasanna has now put the spotlight firmly on how public money is prioritized.
00:14Justice Varley drew a sharp comparison between the money being spent on the upcoming Kumbh
00:21Mela in Nashik and the funds that are available to schools.
00:27His point was not that development or religious events should not receive public funding,
00:32it was that basic education cannot become an afterthought.
00:38Justice Varley said that even if 0.1% of the expenditure planned for Kumbh could make a
00:47significant difference to government schools, why wasn't that being considered?
00:52And look at the numbers which are so striking here.
00:54The comparison is absolute because the estimated Kumbh expenditure is between 32,000 to 34,000
01:04crores.
01:07And according to Justice Varley, just around 32 crores, a fraction of that projected expenditure
01:14could have helped prevent the closure of about 100 to 125 Marathi medium schools.
01:21His concern extends beyond school closure.
01:25He pointed to the condition of government and rural schools, including the ashram alayas,
01:30where basic infrastructure and child safety remains a concern.
01:35And at the same time, he flagged what he described as a worrying trend in education spending, where
01:41budgets are shrinking even as the number of students continues to rise.
01:45And that is the larger message.
01:48This one coming in, getting a big cheer online as well.
01:51For children in rural and government schools, education begins with the basic functioning classrooms,
01:57safe infrastructure, access to school, and somewhere where they don't have to struggle and survive.
02:04So the Chief Justice there putting into perspective what a fraction of allocation that goes into
02:09Kumbh could actually do for our kids' future.
02:16Kumbh could actually do for our kids' future.
02:29Kumbh could actually do for our kids' future.
02:43Kumbh could actually do for our kids' future.
02:56Anisha Mathurna joins us for more perspective on this story.
03:00Anisha, so it was a private event where the justice made these comments.
03:04Brilliant comments, if one can really call it that.
03:07At this point, does it, a comment made by Chief Justice in a private event, does it have
03:14any kind of bearing on the government at all?
03:17And, you know, on one hand, I have to ask you, on one hand we had comments being made
03:23against Gen Z, calling them cockroach, which led to a movement in the country.
03:27And on the other, we have this.
03:28What is this telling us about the vibrancy in our judicial system?
03:33Well, to answer your first question first, Sonal, a comment that has been made by a judge
03:40attending a private event or any comment really outside of an order passed in a courtroom
03:46really doesn't have much of a bearing.
03:48And unfortunately, we've seen the stark reality where even judgments and directions
03:53passed by the courts have not had much of a bearing.
03:56Because if you put Justice Varalay's comment in the context of the larger question of education
04:02budgets and other issues that have actually come before the court, we've seen multiple
04:08situations where courts have questioned why state governments have not given enough money
04:14to child protection systems, including even prosecution of POCSO cases, including education, including food safety schemes, etc.
04:29And every single time various state governments have come and said, we do not have enough budget for it.
04:35In fact, it is the same state of Maharashtra that was wrapped a few years ago by the court for
04:41saying that they do not have
04:42enough money to fund certain child protection schemes and women safety schemes that were supposed to be implemented.
04:51Now, once again, we are seeing a judge talking about education, talking about the budgetary constraints.
04:58Because as you mentioned, Justice Varalay has not said, why are you funding a road corridor or why are you
05:04funding the Kumbh Mela?
05:05He's saying that less than 13% of the annual budget goes to education, which is a worrying trend.
05:14He is pointing out that we are not spending enough to ensure that our schools, our children are in a
05:20shape where we can shape a future for our children.
05:23And in context of the larger question of where education is going, that is a very important point.
05:30Let's see what or if anything comes out of this comment. Back to you.
05:35All right. Welcome comments over there by the Justice.
05:37Let's see how really it's taken in and what feedback actually reaches our political class as well.
Comments

Recommended