Attorney General Todd Blanche says the anti-weaponization fund is “dead” and insists it does not exist, while arguing that people who were allegedly harmed by government weaponization should still be compensated. Blanche says he has testified under oath that the fund is no longer in operation, raising questions over how victims could receive compensation. Watch Blanche’s remarks and the latest debate over the controversial anti-weaponization fund.
#ToddBlanche #AntiWeaponizationFund #Weaponization #DOJ #AttorneyGeneral #TrumpAdministration #USPolitics #FederalGovernment #PoliticalNews #BreakingNews
#ToddBlanche #AntiWeaponizationFund #Weaponization #DOJ #AttorneyGeneral #TrumpAdministration #USPolitics #FederalGovernment #PoliticalNews #BreakingNews
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00The president said in the cabinet meeting that it's dead, he's also said that he likes it,
00:04but he has also said it's dead. Now, as for me, and I keep on saying this over and over
00:08again,
00:08but I'm happy to say it one more time, I have testified under oath that it's dead. I have
00:13testified in front of the house where I wasn't under oath where I said it was dead. I have
00:18answered questions after my hearing where I said that it was dead. Good afternoon. Today we are
00:25announcing the arrests and unsealing of an indictment out of the Southern District of New
00:29York, charging 11 individuals for allegedly overseeing an extensive decade-long marriage
00:38fraud scheme involving more than 1,000 sham marriages between Chinese nationals and United
00:44States citizens, and then the submission of fraudulent applications for green cards. This
00:50is one of the largest marriage fraud prosecutions in United States history. This scheme was not
00:56a quick fly-by-night operation, but rather a years-long multimillion-dollar cottage industry
01:03to criminally assist people who would not or legally could not otherwise become citizens
01:09of the United States. The men and women who facilitated this scheme were all naturalized citizens
01:16originally from China and one green card holder. Under President Trump's leadership, the Department
01:22of Justice is working alongside our partners at DHS to secure the border and protect American
01:28communities, something that was ignored during the last administration. Not only are we protecting
01:35our physical borders from unlawful crossings, but we are also preventing immigration fraud schemes
01:40that are just another way to skirt the immigration laws of the United States. As alleged, some of
01:48the charged defendants acted as facilitators who orchestrated the marriage fraud scheme pairing
01:53foreign nationals seeking immigration status with United States citizens willing to participate
02:01and engage in a sham marriage. These facilitators employed attorneys, tax preparers, and marriage
02:10officiants. Some of the other charged defendants acted as recruiters by finding and recruiting
02:17United States citizens to participate in the scheme, and other defendants acted as officiants,
02:23officiating dozens of these alleged fake marriages. Now, the way that this scheme allegedly worked is the
02:32facilitators used social media and other forms of advertising to market fraudulent immigration services
02:39to foreign nationals, primarily from China, and Chinese nationals would pay these facilitators as much
02:45as $100,000 for assistance in obtaining a marriage, which then allowed them to apply for a green card.
02:53The facilitators also paid willing U.S. citizens as much as $30,000 to engage in the sham marriage
03:00with the foreign national. Now, often after these phony ceremonies, defendants would stage images of families
03:09at restaurants to create the appearance of a legitimate wedding, and some of the defendants also
03:14facilitated sham marriages overseas in China. After the marriages took place, the actual ceremony, the
03:22then-married couples would visit a local office affiliated with the scheme, sign forms for submission to the
03:30U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, learn about the USCIS interview process to apply for a green card,
03:37and then execute prenuptial agreements, which, not surprisingly, given the allegation these were sham
03:45marriages, waived their rights to share in the other's estate upon death, child support, and other claims
03:53in marital property. One prenuptial agreement even provided that, and I'm quoting from the indictment,
03:59except in the name of husband and wife, both parties live independently and must not interfere
04:05with each other." End quote. The facilitators of the scheme would then prepare and submit fraudulent
04:11green card applications and work with the couples through the immigration process, submitting photographs,
04:17opening joint bank accounts, mobile phone accounts, all to obtain green cards to allow them to stay
04:25in this country. But that's illegal. These charges and the indictments now unsealed, they show how far
04:33our people will go to cheat our immigration system. Gaining American citizenship and legal status to
04:39reside in this great nation is a sacred privilege, and we will ensure it is always done in accordance
04:45with the law protecting our communities and national security. These schemes have real costs. They rob our
04:53country of its ability to know who should be and should not be allowed in America. And this department and
05:00the
05:00Department of Homeland Security will not stand for this, and I think this prosecution and the hard work that went
05:06into it with
05:06the agents and the prosecutors show that. Our efforts to protect our immigration system and our country's borders are aggressive
05:14and exhaustive. No matter how complicated the scam, we will do everything in our power to stop it.
05:21Additionally, we've directed the U.S. Attorney's offices around the country and the Criminal Division here
05:25at Maine Justice to work with DHS to prioritize the investigation and prosecution of birth tourism schemes.
05:33We've also directed the Civil Division to prioritize the denaturalization of naturalized citizens who
05:40have obtained citizenship through fraud. Our fantastic lawyers have filed a record number of complaints,
05:45more than 120 at this point, since January 20th, 2025. We are a nation of borders and sovereignty.
05:54The greatness of America is only as strong as our willingness to protect it, and I am proud to be
06:00part of the
06:00the whole-of-government approach to bring down sophisticated networks like this. This is indicative
06:08of the work we're doing to keep America safe. It will continue and will not relent in our efforts to
06:13protect national security. I do want to thank the Southerners of New York for their work in this case,
06:19and our partners at DHS, HSI Homeland Security Investigations, and the FBI for the tireless work in
06:27investigating this case and bringing this prosecution. I'd like to now turn it over to our newly confirmed,
06:35our newly confirmed by the judges SDNY United States Attorney Jamie McDonald. Thank you.
06:45Thank you. Good afternoon. I'm Jamie McDonald, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of
06:51New York. As the Attorney General just laid out, today an indictment has been unsealed in the Southern
06:55District of New York, charging 11 defendants with an expansive conspiracy to commit marriage
07:00and immigration fraud. As alleged in the indictment, over a decade, the defendants and their co-conspirators
07:07orchestrated more than a thousand sham marriages, which were designed to fraudulently obtain lawful
07:13permanent resident status, or green cards, for foreign nationals, primarily from the People's
07:19Republic of China. The defendants allegedly ran a full-service fraud scheme. The Attorney General
07:24laid it out for you, charging fees as much as $100,000 per green card. They recruited U.S. citizens
07:30to
07:31engage in sham marriages, arrange sham wedding ceremonies, complete with officiants, wedding attire,
07:35photographers, and attendees. They put together green card applications with which they submitted
07:41to USCIS, and they manufactured evidence in support of these applications, including by staging photographs,
07:47opening joint accounts. They coached couples before USCIS interviews, and once a foreign national
07:54obtained a green card, they arranged for a divorce. The defendants arrested today played different roles
08:00in the scheme. Some ran the operation, identifying foreign nationals who were willing to pay for the
08:05green cards. Some found or recruited U.S. citizens to enter into sham marriages and carry out the scheme,
08:12and some facilitated the fraudulent applications by leveraging a network of marriage officiants,
08:18attorneys, tax preparers, and other service providers. Through this process, the defendants made
08:24enormous sums of money for themselves. We believe this network took in tens of millions of dollars
08:31over its decade-long operation, making it one of the largest marriage fraud prosecutions in U.S. history.
08:38Investigations of this scale require extraordinary teamwork. The charges unsealed today were made
08:44possible by a coordinated law enforcement response involving federal, state, local partners working
08:52closely with our office. Now, sometimes you all ask, well, how did this investigation, how did this
08:57case come together? The way that this case developed was really, truly remarkable. It began with a single
09:03communication that our office uncovered in an entirely unrelated case. Our prosecutors identified
09:12that communication, thought that it could be tied to a potential marriage and immigration fraud scheme.
09:17They moved quickly. They obtained warrant after warrant and followed the facts where they led. Our
09:24prosecutors and our partners analyzed communications, immigration filings, financial records, photographs,
09:31and other evidence, and identified the key participants in the scheme and the many, many sham marriages
09:39they brokered in furtherance of it. Our prosecutors built and then charged a case aimed at dismantling the
09:46network itself. That's what the case today does. Their work wouldn't have been possible without the
09:52outstanding contributions of our law enforcement partners. But I do want to note that while this
09:58case today is aimed at dismantling the network, our investigation into other aspects of it going up and
10:05down the chain is continuing. I'd like to take a moment to specifically recognize some of the partners that
10:11that we worked with for their invaluable contributions, homeland security investigations, and in
10:18particular the Hudson Valley, Hudson Valley HSI, the FBI and its Westchester Safe Streets Task Force,
10:26the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate,
10:32the United States Army Criminal Investigation Division, the Westchester County DA's Office,
10:37the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Middle District of Florida, and HSI in Jacksonville.
10:42All did extraordinary work with our office to investigate and disrupt the sophisticated and
10:47expansive fraudulent network with remarkable speed. I commend our prosecutors and staff in the Southern
10:54District of New York, especially in our White Plains office, which is where this where this
10:58investigation was run and where the prosecution will proceed, for their speed, creativity,
11:03judgment, and determination with which they built this case. The defendants will be presented
11:09in the White Plains Courthouse later today. I'd also like to thank in particular the Attorney General
11:18and his office for his support in this investigation and the continued efforts of our office and all of
11:24our law enforcement partners. This case shows what coordination, hard work, the sort of whole of
11:29government approach that the Attorney General mentioned, and creativity of our nation's dedicated
11:34public servants can accomplish when we work together to protect the public. Thank you.
11:43Good afternoon. I'm Matthew Millholland, the Deputy for Homeland Security Investigations.
11:49Today's announcement demonstrates the strength and the purpose of Homeland Security Task Force,
11:54bringing together federal, state, and local partners to identify, investigate, and disrupt
12:00complex transnational criminal networks that cross jurisdictions and exploit lawful systems for profit.
12:08I want to thank the Department of Justice, the United States Attorney's Office in the Southern
12:12District of New York, and our federal, our state, and our local partners whose outstanding work brought
12:19this case to this important milestone. Today we're recognizing the results of a broad coordinated
12:24investigation led by HSI Hudson Valley New York into an alleged nationwide and international marriage
12:31fraud network. The indictment unsealed today charges 11 individuals with participating in a conspiracy
12:38involving sham marriages, false filings, and also fraudulent documentation intended to unlawfully obtain
12:45government benefits. The alleged scheme operated for more than a decade and involved countless sham marriages
12:52and it generated tens of millions of dollars in illicit proceeds. The investigation focused on a network
12:59that arranged sham marriages between foreign nationals and United States citizens. These crimes were not only
13:05taking place in New York, they reached across multiple states as well as overseas. The case highlights the
13:12type of complex organized fraud that HSI is uniquely positioned to investigate. Marriage fraud is
13:19not simply a paperwork issue. When individuals or organizations allegedly manufacture relationships,
13:25falsify supporting documents, stage evidence, and attempt to mislead the federal process, they undermine the
13:32integrity of our systems. And these are relied upon by the public and the government alike. From the earliest stages
13:39of this
13:39investigation, HSI Hudson Valley special agents followed the evidence across criminal, financial, and
13:47administrative lanes. The work required patience, it required precision, and it required extensive coordination.
13:57Through the Homeland Security Task Force, investigators were able to seamlessly share critical information,
14:03connect leads across jurisdictions, and mobilize the full strength of our
14:07collective capabilities when and where they were needed most. Together, HSI and its Homeland Security
14:14Task Force partners combined complex fraud expertise, financial analysis, criminal investigative resources,
14:21and local knowledge to address an alleged network that reached beyond any one jurisdiction.
14:27I want to specifically recognize HSI New York's Hudson Valley Office for its leadership in this investigation,
14:32along with the FBI, CIS, ATF, Army, CID, and many other law enforcement partners.
14:40Today's indictment represents an important step in the criminal justice process.
14:45HSI will continue to investigate organizations that seek to profit from fraud, deception, and the exploitation of
14:53lawful government processes. We will do so professionally, meticulously, and in close partnership with prosecutors,
15:01and law enforcement agencies at every level of the U.S. government. I want to thank the special
15:06agents of HSI, our task force officers, analysts, prosecutors, and every partner agency that contributed to
15:13this investigation. Their work reflects the best of coordinated law enforcement in the United States. Thank you.
15:23Thank you. All right. Thanks, everybody. We'll take a couple of questions. David?
15:27Is there any evidence that these people wanted to come to the United States to spy for China?
15:33Is there an espionage aspect to this?
15:36Not as alleged in the indictment, no. I mean, I think that, as the U.S. Attorney mentioned,
15:42this investigation, as you would expect, given the numbers and what we described today, is not over.
15:49So if there's more to come in that space or anywhere else, you'll hear about it, but not as alleged
15:54in the indictment.
15:54And separately, if I could ask you, on the Anthony Fauci contempt referral, is there any update on that? Is
16:00your
16:00office closer to coming forward with any decision on that?
16:04Well, no, I don't have an update. As you guys know, when the Department of Justice receives a referral
16:10from Congress, there's a process. There's a process of how we take it in and how we investigate it.
16:18But any update that I would expect to come from this department would be if there's ultimately a
16:23decision made. And that certainly won't be anytime soon.
16:26And the reflective case may be earned.
16:29What about the reflective?
16:30What about the test that you guys have come forward and look at potential misdemeanor?
16:34Is there any update on where you guys are with that?
16:36I don't know what you mean by the White House has asked us to do that. But no, I don't
16:42have an update
16:42on that. I think there's been a lot of comments and source-based comments about what, if anything's
16:50happening with that case. The judge ruled in that case, or we're waiting for the ruling.
16:53And I don't have an update, no.
16:56We've learned that the Justice Department has unsealed a case against the former chief financial
17:03officer of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Can you please speak a little bit about what
17:08you've learned as part of that investigation and if we should expect more charges?
17:13So, yes. Today, my understanding is today there was an arrest made and there is a new indictment
17:19that includes the former CFO of SPLC. I don't have any comments about whether, we've said from the
17:27beginning, everybody, not just me, but anybody who's talked about this case, like virtually every criminal
17:31case, the fact that an indictment is returned doesn't end the investigation. It's just part of
17:38the investigation in most cases, which is certainly true in this case. I think as alleged in the
17:42indictment, this individual participated in the scheme. As alleged, I believe she was part of the
17:49effort to open bank accounts and complete fictitious companies' names and make payments to individuals for
17:56reasons that were not accurate as described. But I don't have, I think the indictment was unsealed
18:06this morning. I don't have, or I believe it was unsealed this morning. I think the arrest was this
18:09morning. I don't have anything to say beyond that, except to say that this is exactly what we said
18:13would happen in a case like this, which is that our investigators and the U.S. attorneys and the agents
18:19working the case will keep on working it even after the initial indictment.
18:23Thank you. Question about yesterday, President Trump said that he's exploring federal options
18:29against New York City's second home tax. Is the DOJ exploring legal options to counter that tax right
18:36now? I don't have any comment about what we're doing to explore legal options with respect to that tax.
18:43I think that's a combination of the Department of Justice and potentially other agencies that would
18:48look into what to do. The President's spoken publicly about his views of it and
18:52we stand. The Department of Justice has filed civil lawsuits against cities all over the country
18:57where appropriate, but we haven't filed a lawsuit yet and I'm not going to comment on what we're doing
19:03around that. Yes. I have a question about a different kind of fraud. Thank you so much. Oh, thank you.
19:13The Justice Department's been investing a lot of resources in combating fraud on taxpayer programs.
19:19In addition to cases that target beneficiaries and providers who file fraudulent claims,
19:26can we expect to see the Justice Department pursue state officials who have been aware of extensive fraud,
19:31but have failed to stop it like? Well, so we've talked extensively as has the Vice President of the
19:39Task Force that we very much believe that one of the reasons why we have a massive fraud problem and
19:44a massive issue of people stealing from taxpayer money is because state officials are not doing their
19:50job in making sure that there's appropriate checks in place to stop the fraud. Now, there's a difference
19:56between a state employee or state official not doing their job and committing a crime. And so
20:03when we when we look at at some of these programs that are being administered by the states and we
20:08see absolutely no effort to do anything to police who's receiving the money, then that's something that
20:15we, of course, will investigate. But that's different than when then whether we will ultimately charge an
20:20individual with a crime. If we learn that that an individual has committed a crime, whether it's
20:25a participant in the scheme, a leader or a city official or a city leader, yes, we will absolutely
20:31indict and prosecute that person, which is what we would do in any case. But I do think that as
20:37the
20:37Vice President has talked about repeatedly, one of the the wake up calls we hope governors and city
20:43officials will take from what we've been doing over the past six months, nine months,
20:47is is to realize that they need to put this is money. This is taxpayer money,
20:52the generosity of the American taxpayer. And so they need to do their part to make sure
20:57that they are the first line of defense, that the people applying for these benefits are entitled to
21:02receive them. But but but if we learn that that they're not only, you know, closing their eyes and
21:07letting it happen, but affirmatively helping in a criminal way, we'll definitely move forward with
21:12that. Yeah, it's been a while now since Vice President Vance referred the top Democratic
21:19leadership of Minnesota to DOJ for this type of investigation. Can you talk about the status of
21:25where that stands? Of of where an investigation the leaders have been? He referred it over here.
21:31Is that something you've opened on or you intend to? Or can you just kind of just, you know, are
21:35you
21:35making progress toward that end? We've spent a ton of resources and we continue to spend a ton of
21:41resources in Minneapolis combating fraud. And that includes a very intense look at the leadership
21:48and the programs and who's administering them. But beyond and the governor knows that and everybody
21:53knows that. And that should be the case. That's what every single person should expect us to do is
21:57the Department of Justice. So but I don't have an update or comment on on how that's progressing
22:02beyond that beyond the fact that, yes, we have a lot of resources spending there. Yes, attorney general,
22:07this is either for you or for the U.S. attorney. The there's a hearing scheduled Friday in the
22:13Luigi Mangione case. And the question is whether does this indicate that there might be a plea in
22:20the offering in that case? Is there anything you can update us on on that issue? Yeah, go ahead.
22:27There's a conference scheduled for 11 a.m. on Friday. And that that's all we can say at this time.
22:32On this case, on this case for the attorney, I was curious about what were the common themes here
22:41of people who were Americans that were targeted in this? If you can clarify how this was, you know,
22:47maybe discovered and how these people were found to take part in this. It's a good question. I'm not
22:53sure that there was a common theme with respect to the Americans. I think there were common themes in
22:57respect to the ways that they were recruited. They were recruited through various networks. The
23:03individuals that we've charged today, some of them were recruiters. They were out trying to identify
23:09people who would serve on the other side of these sham marriages. They then used their own networks to
23:15try to recruit additional people. A significant amount of it was done through various methods of
23:21communication, including social media advertisements that were sort of veiled where they may not have
23:27been a parent on their face that they were recruiting U.S. citizens to participate in these sham marriages,
23:33but that could lead to the initial discussion. And then in those discussions, they were they were
23:38recruited to be part of the to be part of the scheme. Alex.
23:47One on this case, just on the number of marriages, the 1000 number. I mean, what happens to the people
23:53who receive the green cards? Is there a process where they're going to be ultimately have their
23:57green cards revoked? And then on a separate question afterwards, if I can. Sure. So it depends on the
24:03circumstances. So I this scheme started in 2016 ended now that we just brought it down. And so
24:11depending on where a a criminal because that's what they are, where they are in the process of the
24:17immigration process, some some of them will be earlier on. Some of them already have their green card.
24:21Some of them may actually already be citizens. So depending on where they are, yes, that's part of
24:27the investigation that we're doing now. And there's a lot of work. There's thousands of marriages that
24:32we're looking into. And so I expect that there will be more work, whether that's civil, like you just
24:38asked, where you're pulling their their immigration status and deporting them or criminal, depending on
24:44the the circumstances and the proof that we have. Exactly. But that's a that's a big effort that we're
24:50taking that we're undertaking now. And I think that it's hard to say this is what will happen with every
24:57single sham marriage, because it depends on on the evidence and the factors just on a follow up.
25:03The president has never gone as far as you have to say that the anti weaponization fund
25:07is dead now that you've been confirmed narrowly because arguably of that anti weapons weaponization
25:12fund. Just the president said this week, he'd leave it up to you. What's your answer? Is it dead?
25:17And is it ever going to come back? Well, so I quibble with that because the president said in the
25:22cabinet meeting that it's dead. He's also said that he likes it, but he has also said it's dead now
25:27as
25:27for me. And I keep on saying this over and over again, but I'm happy to say it one more
25:31time.
25:31I have testified under oath that it's dead. I have testified in front of the house where I wasn't under
25:37oath where I said it was dead. I have answered questions after my hearing where I said that it was
25:43dead. I have rescinded the order that that set up the weaponization fund, which means that it does not
25:50exist. We as we've said repeatedly, there were never commissioners. There was never any money went
25:55anywhere. So I'm not sure how I can further say that the anti weaponization fund doesn't exist or
26:02we use the word dead. But if anybody has any ideas, we also have said under oath that if Congress
26:10would
26:10like to to to make it a law that we would support that as with the White House. So I'm
26:16not sure I get
26:18that this is a super fun story to not let die. But I don't know what else to say except
26:23that that
26:23writes that, yes, the president feels very strongly, as do I, that there were people who were victims of
26:31of a Department of Justice that was absolutely weaponized. And he feels very strongly that that
26:36he would want to to make them whole, as do I. But it will not be through the anti weaponization
26:42fund,
26:43which, again, was never set up. And nothing has happened with it. But thanks, Alex. Sarah.
26:52I'm short. I have an on topic and an off topic on topic. You know, I know that SDNY in
26:59particular,
26:59actually, has done a lot of investigations over the last several years into, you know, people who were
27:05harassed by China, who are political dissidents, who are trying to escape oppression. So I'm curious if any
27:11of the people in these thousand marriages were maybe in that position where they were trying to get
27:16cover, you know, to protect themselves from, you know, being harassed by China. That's my on topic
27:22question. So I think I think and Jamie can speak more to this if he chooses. But it's hard to
27:29label
27:30a particular marriage and a particular reason or why it happened. You're right. Southern and Eastern
27:35New York have had a lot of cases in that space over the past couple of years. When I will
27:41add,
27:41though, that if if there is a Chinese national national who feels like they're being harassed,
27:47they have other ways to to remedy that besides entering to a sham marriage. Right. You can't just
27:53because you're being harassed doesn't give you the right to go commit a crime. So but yeah, I don't
27:57think it's fair to try to say some percentage or some number may have separately claimed that they were harassed.
28:03So my off topic, I was just curious if there were any updates, you know, we've been having primaries
28:10across the country. And as usual, the Civil Rights Division has been sending monitors in some of these
28:15places to sort of keep tabs on things in the past. They've, you know, the head of the Civil Rights
28:20Division has said some of these areas, some of these counties have had irregularities. She said in the
28:25past have what what's been the feedback so far? Have you have you spoken with people in the Civil Rights
28:31Division to see what they're observing in these primaries and if you have any concerns that they
28:35have raised as they've been observing polling places? So I don't have an update necessarily
28:41today to say here's what we're doing. But yes, that is a that is something that the Department of
28:45Justice, as every Department of Justice does, is making sure that we're appropriately monitoring
28:50between now and you're right, there's primaries, but up through the election and and we'll continue to
28:55do that. I think there's there's going there's not anything secretive about this process. There's
29:00not supposed to be. I don't think there should be. So to the extent that that the Civil Rights
29:04Division is doing something, we're not going to do it in secret. You'll you'll you'll know about it
29:09because it's important the American people know about it because we're doing it to make sure that we
29:13have elections that are that are fair and run the right way. So I'll take one more question. Got it.
29:18Go ahead. Next week, there's a deadline in the Comey case. The defense has said that there was
29:25evidence that was gathered by the government that suggested there were alternative reasons,
29:30you know, sort of the restaurant narrative of 86. How confident are you today that that case will
29:35survive to trial and ultimately result in the conviction? So I'm not going to comment on a defense
29:40filing in any case because that's not fair to any of the parties involved. And so I don't have a
29:45comment
29:46on the the the the way that every case works in this country is that when every indicted case is
29:52it means a grand jury has returned an indictment. That means that a grand jury found probable cause
29:56that a crime has been committed and and there's a trial and there's a lot of cases as a prosecutor
30:02that I felt were definitely going to get convictions and that's that didn't or that it was a tough
30:07tough conviction. There's cases that were really really tough that got convictions and so I'm certainly
30:12not going to act like I have a crystal ball and predict what's going to happen with with that
30:17case at trial. But it's enough to say that that these this was a case that was returned by a
30:22grand
30:22jury. It's not out of DC. It's out of a district in North Carolina and we'll go from there. All
30:29right.
30:29Thanks a lot everybody. Have a good day.
30:33Subscribe to One India and never miss an update. Download the One India app now.
Comments