Skip to playerSkip to main content
Senate spokesman says subpoena ruling was 'surgical, not sweeping'

Lawyer Reginald Tongol, Senate impeachment court spokesman, says its ruling on the subpoena request of the House prosecution team was "surgical, not sweeping."

VIDEO BY REINA TOLENTINO

Check out our Streaming Channel: https://streaming.manilatimes.net/

Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe

Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net

Follow us:
Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook
Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram
Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter
DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion

Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital

Check out our Podcasts:
Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify
Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts
Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic
Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer
Tune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein

#TheManilaTimes
#TMTNews
#Senate
#Philippines

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00...issued a calibrated, meticulous, and legally unassainable resolution regarding the prosecution's request for subpenas directed at the BIR, the AMLC,
00:12and various banking institutions.
00:14The guiding principle of the impeachment court today was simple.
00:18The search for truth will be unyielding, but it will not be an unbridled fishing expedition.
00:24The court's actions are surgical, not sweeping.
00:27Here are the six critical takeaways from today's rulings.
00:32First, the spousal accounts.
00:35The court granted the subpina for the PESOL accounts and tax records of the responded Vice President, her husband, Attorney
00:44Manassas Cardio, and 20 specific corporate entities.
00:48To those asking why a private citizen's accounts are included, Philippine civil law is clear.
00:54Under the Family Code, the couple is governed by the absolute community of property.
00:58There is only one marital part.
01:00It is a legal and mathematical impossibility to audit the wealth of the Vice President without auditing the community property
01:09she jointly shares with her husband.
01:12Also, Section 8 of Republic Act No. 6713 requires public officials to disclose their assets, including those of their spouses.
01:21Their financial interests are therefore intertwined for purposes of disclosure.
01:27Second, the exclusion of dollar accounts.
01:31The court strictly denied the subpina for any foreign currency deposits.
01:36The court is bound by the rule of law.
01:39Republic Act 6426 provides absolute secrecy for dollar accounts unless there is a written waiver from the depositor.
01:48The court learned from the Supreme Court's temporary restraining order against the Senate during the 2012 corona impeachment in the
01:56case of P.S. Bank v. Senate Impeachment Court.
02:00The court will not overstep these statutory boundaries again.
02:04Third, the 2007 to 2021 timeframe.
02:09The court approved the request for historical records dating back to 2007.
02:16These are now being admitted to charge the Vice President with new past offenses.
02:22They are strictly allowed as a factual baseline based on the cases of Office of the Ombudsman v. Carrado and
02:30Concerned Taxpayer v. Doblada Jr.
02:33To determine if wealth accumulated today is disproportionate, there must first be an establishment of what the spouses legitimately owned
02:43yesterday.
02:45Fourth, on the corporate entities.
02:47The court proved its refusal to allow fishing expedition by outright denying the subpinas for JTC Group of Companies, Philippines
02:57Inc. and Pikimong-Pikimong Philippines Corporation.
03:00As the documents submitted to the court neither show the names of the respondent and or her husband in the
03:07general information sheets of the two corporations, nor the admitted sal-ends by the respondent disclose these two corporations.
03:17Absent, the corporate veil of fiction remains.
03:29The impeachment court only granted subpoenas for the 20 entities where the respondent's links were primatis proven by documents submitted
03:39to the court and or admitted by parties.
03:41As to the corporate lawyers' partnership, the court acknowledged that the issuance is subject to whatever legal remedies they may
03:49resort to in order to raise any attorney-client privilege over particular documents at the proper time.
03:56Fifth, on the BIR records, the court granted the subpoenas to the BIR as to the respondent, her husband, and
04:0620 entities, which is composed of 19 corporations and one partnership.
04:14Based on the case of DPAC v. Pausas-Olivan, that states, Section 270 of the tax code obviously does not
04:22address the confidentiality of ITERs.
04:25The tax code recognized disclosures permitted under its specific provisions, other statutes, or in any other manner provided by law.
04:35The constitutional authority of the Senate impeachment court under its rules to compel the production of relevant evidence constitutes such
04:43lawful process.
04:44But the court recognizes that under the tax code, the commissioner may still invoke the requirement of the president's authorization
04:52to release these documents.
04:53The court has done its constitutional duty.
04:56It will now await the official return of the BIR Commission.
05:00It will now await the official return of the BIR Commission.
05:26They will now await the tax code.
05:28The court requiresически calculation of consent.
05:32You
Comments

Recommended