Skip to playerSkip to main content
As rivalry among major powers puts growing pressure on multilateral institutions, experts say the solution is not to abandon multilateralism but to reform it, making it more flexible, inclusive and driven by regional leadership. #AWANIinternational
Transcript
00:00As multilateral institutions come under increasing strain from rivalry among major powers,
00:06questions are growing over whether they still serve the interests of middle powers.
00:11Speaking on the sidelines of the 39th Asia-Pacific Roundtable,
00:15International Relations Professor Dr. Ken Jimbo from KO University says
00:19the answer is not to abandon multilateralism but to reform it
00:24by making it more flexible, inclusive and regionally driven.
00:31Jimbo pointed to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership or CPTPP
00:37as proof that multilateral cooperation can still thrive even without the participation of major powers.
00:44One of the primary examples is the establishment of the CPTPP.
00:49Even the United States decided to withdraw from the TPP negotiation.
00:55U.S. minus, I mean, the country minus the United States have decided to go for TPP-11
01:02and that eventually turned into the CPTPP has been defining what kind of a rule-based economic order
01:09should be placed in Asia-Pacific.
01:12And then we actually have a different standard sets of what kind of economic liberalism,
01:19you know, the rule that really satisfy the business activities in the region can be placed.
01:24And everybody tried to subscribe towards it.
01:27So we are happy that the U.K. is in, and also that many of Southeast Asian countries are now
01:33thinking about how to deal with the CPTPP agenda.
01:37Those are, I think, one of the prototype models that we can think about how to reconstruct the wider range
01:43of the global order.
01:45So you mentioned about OCAS, Quad, and many of the multilaterals.
01:49And I think that, I do not think that they are very much interested in, you know, adding new members
01:55into those.
01:56And these are designed to be very much exclusive and competitive.
02:01It has certain strategic benefit for participating in Asia for strategic alignments and military exercises
02:08and emerging technology cooperation and so on.
02:12But it's not really designed to be, you know, inclusive for the regional grouping.
02:18So that I think both sides of the multilateral character can coexist together.
02:23But I'm talking about, you know, when it comes to the connection to the global order.
02:28But Jimbo said middle powers must take greater ownership of solving their own regional challenges
02:34to strengthen their strategic influence.
02:36He cited Malaysia's role in facilitating talks between Thailand and Cambodia
02:41as an example of how Asian countries can lead in resolving regional issues.
02:46One of the examples that I also like to cite is that, you know, last year that Malaysia
02:53hosted the Thai-Cambodia, you know, like stakeholders to get together in Malaysia
02:58and play the very important intermediary roles to get them to be on board
03:05to talk about each other and come up with temporarily but very important solutions.
03:11And I'm very satisfied with Malaysia's chairmanship role in those.
03:17But something that I also like to say one word is that, you know,
03:21you also have United States and China back on the board.
03:26It's a kind of interesting dynamics to have a layered solution on this.
03:31But I think this is one of the particular case that ASEAN also needs to demonstrate
03:38how much they can really solve by themselves.
03:41It's a regional problem and it has to be, you know, solved by the regional capacity.
03:47And that can also be going to the question of Myanmar as well.
03:51So these are something that I really wish to see in the years to come
03:56about demonstrating the capacity to solve their problem by themselves.
04:01It's really creating the logic of how middle power can really exhort its power.
Comments

Recommended