Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
Swiss voters have rejected a proposal to cap the country’s population at 10 million until 2050 - a move that would have sharply limited immigration and potentially threatened Switzerland’s free movement arrangements with the EU.
But with the vote relatively close, what does the result reveal about divisions over migration, and the rise of far-right politics in Europe?
Dr Georgios Samaras, Assistant Professor of Public Policy at King’s College London, spoke to CGTN Europe about the referendum and its wider implications.

Category

🎵
Music
Transcript
00:00Let's bring in Dr. Georgia Samaras, who's Assistant Professor of Public Policy at King's College here in London.
00:06Good to have you with us, Dr. Samaras. Thank you for joining us.
00:08So, Swiss voters rejected the population cap vote, but the result was still quite close, wasn't it?
00:13What does that tell us, do you think, about how divided the Swiss electorate is on this issue?
00:20I think that there is this impression that Switzerland has a direct democracy system
00:26that allows people through referenda to make meaningful decisions about policymaking in the country.
00:32In my view, it's such a flawed idea.
00:34The division that you accurately pointed out is serious.
00:38There is nearly 45% of the population that believes that through biopolitical measures
00:44they will be able to control the population.
00:46This is all against migration, and the referendum was proposed by the far right,
00:51which also indicates that some of these ideas have entered the mainstream in the most aggressive way possible,
00:57and it shows also that countries will inevitably rely on those measures to curb the migration waves in Europe.
01:05So, yeah, we're witnessing some really, really groundbreaking measures within European states.
01:11And just let's talk a little bit about this idea of direct democracy
01:14and this interesting system that there is in Switzerland where major national issues can be put to the whole nation
01:22to vote on in referenda, something that's not that common.
01:26Of course, we had something similar 10 years ago in Britain, which led to very serious consequences.
01:30But leaving that aside, for Switzerland, does this system of so-called direct democracy,
01:35does it lead to effective government, or can it lead to chaos?
01:38And how binding are these votes?
01:40If it had passed, for example, would Switzerland really have been forced to leave the EU's free movement of people
01:46system, for example?
01:49They're not legally binding, and the state doesn't have to implement them,
01:54but their ideas and also some of those concepts that are being proposed are absolutely absurd.
01:59In the middle of the pandemic, they managed to ban face covers like kneecap from public.
02:05This was aimed at targeted tiny percentage of the population in Switzerland that happens to identify as Muslim.
02:15With this latest referendum, despite not being legally binding, it demonstrates how powerful the far-right has become.
02:23I mentioned earlier Michel Foucault, which is the biopolitical nature,
02:27the state tries to legislate over bodies and identities to curb migration financially.
02:34That would be a disastrous decision, primarily because what you also pointed out about the measures that will be required
02:42to be introduced
02:44before the 10 million, basically if it passed the 10 million mark,
02:50because they will have to leave free movement.
02:54What would that look like?
02:56What is Switzerland prepared to do to deal with the economic destruction that will follow
03:03without any kind of migration coming to the country?
03:07That's what I mean about direct democracy.
03:09It's flawed because it tries to give some power to the people,
03:13but the power ends up being over cultural issues that have been turned into dominant themes in politics.
03:20I mean, they should not be dominant themes.
03:22Indeed. And just very briefly, of course, the Swiss government is saying that foreign workers are needed,
03:27but the foreign-born population has risen rapidly, hasn't it, in Switzerland?
03:31And this backlash against foreign migration, at least in the far right,
03:37is that anything particularly new, though?
03:40And does it reflect what we're really seeing across Europe, this rising tide of nationalism?
03:46The difference here is how a measure that is so aggressive and so, I would argue,
03:56Hitlerian became nearly a policy-making tool in the hands of a political entity
04:02that is trying to demonize the migration in Switzerland.
04:07Other parts of the far right in Europe don't have that kind of power,
04:12but because of the Swiss system, the referendum can be proposed by political parties across the spectrum.
04:18The fact that this referendum took place shows us what could happen if the far right comes to power.
04:25And that applies to most German-speaking countries like Austria, Germany.
04:30Germany, Switzerland, I think, is trying to somehow deal with the questions that the far right poses,
04:39like, do we want this or do we basically reject it?
04:43In this case, they rejected it, but the majority, of course, was tiny.
04:47And it also shows that the far right has the power to proceed with having a say in the policy
04:54-making agenda,
04:55even if that is financially disastrous.
04:58Dr. Georges Samaras, Assistant Professor of Public Policy at King's College London,
05:02thank you very much for sharing your insights with us.
Comments

Recommended