Faut-il étendre le protocole de la VAR à d’autres usages ?

djayfoot

La Premier League a récemment refusé une partie du projet visant à étendre l’utilisation de la VAR, notamment pour corriger certaines mauvaises attributions de corners. En revanche, d’autres évolutions ont été validées, comme l’intervention de la vidéo sur les erreurs d’identité ou sur certaines situations pouvant entraîner un deuxième carton jaune.  Ce débat relance forcément une question centrale dans le football moderne : jusqu’où faut-il aller avec la VAR ? Aujourd’hui, beaucoup de supporters restent opposés à son développement, voire souhaitent un retour au football sans assistance vidéo. Mais cette défiance vient surtout des nombreuses incohérences, des erreurs d’interprétation et des interruptions interminables qui cassent totalement le rythme des matchs.  La réflexion devient beaucoup plus intéressante si l’on imagine une VAR parfaite, sans erreur et capable de corriger chaque situation correctement. Dans ce cas-là, une partie des critiques disparaîtrait probablement. Le vrai problème ne serait alors plus l’outil lui-même, mais sa manière d’être utilisé et l’impact qu’il a sur la fluidité du jeu.  C’est notamment le cas sur les hors-jeu ou certaines mains litigieuses. Quand il faut plusieurs minutes et une multitude d’angles pour prendre une décision, cela pose forcément un problème de cohérence. Si une action reste impossible à trancher clairement malgré toute la technologie disponible, certains estiment qu’il faudrait simplement laisser la décision initiale.  L’enjeu principal semble donc être la rapidité d’intervention. Beaucoup accepteraient davantage d’extensions de la VAR si les décisions devenaient quasiment instantanées et ne coupaient plus complètement le rythme des rencontres. Le football cherche encore l’équilibre entre justice sportive et fluidité du spectacle.  #VAR #PremierLeague #Arbitrage #Football #HorsJeu #Main #PL  #Dailymotion #DailymotionShorts #DailymotionStudio

Transcript

00:00Should the use cases for VAR be expanded?

00:02This debate is incredibly interesting, both because it's so complex and because the opinions one can have are so varied.

00:05slightly biased by the current view of arbitration.

00:08To quickly summarize the basic story, the Premier League has just partially rejected an expansion project

00:13from VAR.

00:13This project allowed for three things: 1. It also corrected player identity errors, for example when

00:18An umpire was about to give a yellow card to the wrong person.

00:21but also the cases where there could potentially be a second yellow card which could be the red card.

00:25And the last one, and this is the one that the Premier League rejected in particular, is the case where

00:28We could correct the incorrect corner assignments.

00:31In other words, I don't know, there's a shot that's deflected, then deflected again, well, where is it

00:34vague,

00:35Basically, VAR could directly call the referee to say, "Well, there's a corner," or to retake it.

00:39a corner.

00:40So everyone reacted a bit in all sorts of ways, but I invite you to

00:43to reflect on a condition.

00:44Let's assume that VAR had no flaws, that it made virtually no mistakes.

00:48In that case, would you be in favor of extending the responsibilities of VAR?

00:51Because it's true that there are many who are against it for a reason that doesn't have

00:54almost completely unrelated to the debate.

00:56The problem is that there are a lot of errors with VAR; it makes the errors much more frequent.

00:58more frustrating.

00:59Inevitably, after seeing errors here and inconsistencies there,

01:02When you see the state of the refereeing in both Champions League semi-finals,

01:05Well, I'm still in favor, but on one condition: that VAR needs to be made more fluid.

01:10I will take two examples, let's say we are judging an offside.

01:12In my opinion, we shouldn't take 4, 5, or 6 minutes to judge an offside.

01:16Either it's blatant, bam, VAR cancels it, or it's a close call, come on, we let it go.

01:21The same goes for a hand; at some point, if we really take 5 or 6 minutes to think about whether...

01:25'There is a hand or there is no hand,'

01:26Well, it's just that it's not obvious at all.

01:27I remind you that VAR is not there to make football error-free.

01:30but to correct the most obvious errors.

01:32So I agree with these arrangements, but only on one condition,

01:35The important thing is that it's quick, that we don't need to check for more than 2

01:39minutes.

01:39We really should set a timer, literally, if after 2 minutes we still can't decide,

01:43We'll continue the game, too bad.

01:44And as for corners, it's going to be more of a caricature for me.

01:47Either it can be done in a few seconds, so that the referee can correct himself very quickly,

01:51Oh well, too bad, we're not going to ruin an action, because ultimately there was a corner kick before.

01:55And if we open the door to that, well, we open the door to just about anything.

Catégorie

Transcription

Commentaires

Recommandations