00:00It's not going to make the team, that one player in the, in the short term, it doesn't
00:05make sense.
00:05It's not going to turn this team around.
00:07No, that doesn't mean they shouldn't do it.
00:09They should do it.
00:10They should do it because of that time.
00:12Like he's, he's been there for a while, man.
00:13It's not going to all of a sudden make the Red Sox a lineup that produces six, seven
00:18runs a night or makes them a draw or makes them worth like, you know, watching if you're
00:22a casual fan, it's not going to do it for you.
00:25Mike Trout is a name and he's a hell of a ball player.
00:28But I, for that purpose, I don't think it should even be a factor that shouldn't even
00:31be factored in.
00:32Isn't that what they would be doing it for though?
00:34No, it's not a move, but it's not a move that Craig Breslau would make.
00:37So it wouldn't be a move that Craig Breslau would make.
00:40And I hear your point about, it would signify, it would signal there's no plan.
00:44There is no plan now.
00:45Okay.
00:46There is no valid plan in place.
00:48There is no track that they are on toward building a contender and a real team.
00:53So yeah, I guess this would be more proof of that, but it's all.
00:58It's already true.
00:59They should get him because the guy can hit and they don't have bats and they're going
01:04to need bats now and in the future.
01:07And he also serves a dual purpose of bringing in a veteran player who knows what it is to
01:13be a ball player and be a pro and be a guy who has expectations put on him season in
01:19season
01:19out and could be that mentor guy to Roman Anthony.
01:22They, if they want that, if they need that, Trout is a good dude for that purpose.
01:27He also can mash.
01:29He can still hit.
01:30He will be able to continue to hit.
01:32They need offense.
01:34They should get them.
01:35He will be able to do this.
01:38You
Comments