Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
El bienestar y la seguridad económica de millones de personas en la vejez está en juego. Hoy en el país solo se pensiona una de cada cuatro personas mayores, por eso, desde ya, tenemos que hablar sobre cuáles son los problemas del sistema y cómo se pueden solucionar.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00When talking about pensiones, there is only one agreement.
00:02Colombia needs a reform.
00:04Experts of all the political spectrum recognize problems like
00:08the insostenibility of the system, the inequity it is and the poor coverage it is.
00:13This last, the coverage, is for many people the last last part of the system.
00:18Actualmente, there are 4,9 millions of adults older than 60 years old without a pension.
00:24That's only one reason to talk about reforming pensiones.
00:28But there are also other elements, like the competition between regimes,
00:32which many times leave the Colombians on the side that less benefit gives them.
00:37For all this, and around the corner of the presidential election,
00:41we have to talk about pensiones.
00:44And although for many people the word pension is a future or a fiction,
00:49here is the well-being and economic security of millions of people in age.
00:56So, let's go for parts.
00:58Before reforming, we have to know how the system works.
01:02In Colombia, no we have a single or homogenous system of pensiones.
01:10After the Ley 100, we have 4 regimes.
01:14They are the regime of the media, which is what today is known as Colpensiones,
01:21which includes the particular workers and some employees of the state.
01:28The capitalization regime, which is known as RAIS, which was the creation of the law itself,
01:35is also dedicated to the particular workers and some employees of the state.
01:40And, on the other hand, we have something that, after the Ley 100,
01:46which is called the Special Regímenes Speciales,
01:49which are the public funcionaries of high range, or of all ranges,
01:56that had specific conditions for pensiones, and that were covered with the Ley 33,
02:04and entered into a transition that ended in 2014.
02:09Today, in the Special Regímenes Speciales, no there is no one affiliated,
02:13but there are 400,000 pensionados and those for the state.
02:17And the fourth regime, those are the Execuers,
02:21those people who stayed outside of the Ley 7.
02:25There were Ecopetrol, the Magisterium, the military, and the police.
02:33Today, those Regímenes Execuers are located in the Caja de Sueldos de Retiro de la Policía, CASUR,
02:43in the Caja de Sueldos de Retiro de los Militares, CREMIL, and in the Fondo del Magisterio FORMAC.
02:49In this discussion, you will hear constantly two terms.
02:53Regímen de Ahorro Individual con Solidaridad, RAISE,
02:56and Regímen de Prima Media, RPM.
02:58In simple words, in the RAISE, which is operated by the Administrators of Fondos de Pensiones,
03:03you build your own property.
03:05Also, this capital is invested by these companies.
03:10That is, in the future, you will receive the money that earned more than the result of these investments.
03:16In the RPM, administered by Colpensiones,
03:19the pensioners pay with the aportes of the cotisers.
03:23As in this moment, the money that enters is not enough,
03:27it is also dedicated to public resources,
03:29because the pension is a fundamental right that the state should guarantee the state.
03:34Actualmente, in Colpensiones, there are 6,7 millones of afiliados and 1,5 millones of pensionados.
03:40In the Administrators of Fondos of Pensiones, there are 18 million of afiliados and 251.000 of pensionados.
03:46In both cases, only the third part of the afiliados is currently currently cotizing actively.
03:52In other words, the majority of the afiliados are in the AFP,
03:56but the majority of the pensionados are in Colpensiones.
03:59A balance that is explained in good part because the RISE is a home regime.
04:04Now, to understand the reform proposals, it is necessary to know two programs.
04:09The first is Colombia Mayor,
04:11a subsidy of $80.000,
04:13which is a $80.000 that is offered to the adults in conditions of vulnerability,
04:16that they can comply with certain criteria.
04:18Although the program does arrive to the most vulnerable and even improve the life of the people mayors and their
04:26homes,
04:26the amount is very low and the coverage is insufficient.
04:31In general, one of the four colombianos receive a pension.
04:35One of the four colombianos receive a pension.
04:35One of the four colombianos receive a pension.
04:36One of the two colombianos receive a pension.
04:37But the rest of the two do not receive anything.
04:39And another one that is worth having in mind.
04:41In the General Presupuesto General of 2020,
04:44for every peso that is destined to the Colombia Mayor program,
04:47se destinaron $9.5 pesos for a pensionado of Colpensiones
04:51and $30 pesos for a pensionado of the Funds of Pensiones Públicas.
04:55The Beneficios Económicos Periódicos,
04:57known as BEPS,
04:59are another program to have in mind.
05:01This is an option for those who earn less than a minimum salary
05:05can receive an income after their retirement.
05:09Actualmente, 38.700 people receive, in promedio, $222.000 each month.
05:16With this panorama in mind, it's time to see the main problem.
05:19The coberture.
05:21The big problem on which should be focused on the pension,
05:26and more than the pension,
05:29a model of protection for women is the low coberture.
05:34Also, the lack of coberture,
05:35the lack of coberture of the system
05:37does not affect all the same.
05:38There are some structural inequalities
05:41that make, for example,
05:43that women are more affected in the pension issue,
05:48so as we have, of course, in the world of work
05:51also breaches and inequalities that persist.
05:54So, if you look at the tax of active affiliation,
05:57in the case of the women, it's a 29%.
06:00In the case of the men, it's a 38%.
06:03Also, if you look at who gets a pension,
06:07the 29% are men, the 19% are women.
06:11And there are also differences in terms of the amount.
06:14In the case of the men, it's a 73,1%.
06:26Now, the most important question.
06:29How should the pension reform be?
06:32No, there is a unique answer,
06:34because there are a variety of visions
06:35about how to fix the system,
06:37something like a talla that doesn't serve to all.
06:40What do you think about a reform of the system of pillars?
06:44It's clear that the first pillar is the pillar subsidiary,
06:51that is, the no-contributive.
06:53That pillar subsidiary should strengthen Colombia Mayor
06:57as a total subsidy.
06:58There is a discussion of which will be the number
07:00which would be the number that would be mensual
07:03to the people,
07:03and that it would not be conditioned
07:06to the political clientelism that today
07:08we have in Colombia Mayor.
07:10Second alternative,
07:13those who do not,
07:14those who do not comply with the requisitions
07:17for pensioners.
07:18That cannot be a devolution.
07:21Here, what we have to think is
07:23in the partial subsidy,
07:25what today is BEPS,
07:27that all those who do not comply with the resources,
07:31those that they have earned
07:32they become the base of a pension
07:34that the state subsidizes parcialmente
07:37for that they have a permanent income
07:39and not a devolution
07:40for that they do not end
07:42in one or two years
07:44with the discussion
07:45that it is to raise more
07:48and that with pensioners.
07:49No,
07:50the object of a pension system
07:53is pensioner,
07:54not devolver money.
07:56So,
07:57for that,
07:57for that,
07:57for that,
07:57for that,
07:58for that,
07:58there are two things,
08:00subsidio total
08:01and subsidio parcial.
08:03The second pilar
08:04is the regime contributive.
08:06In the regime contributive
08:07the discussion is
08:08if the regime
08:09of the media
08:10and the capitalization
08:11should compete
08:12and what is demonstrated
08:13in Colombia
08:14is that
08:15compete
08:15not to the country.
08:17It should be complementarian.
08:19And then,
08:19here comes the discussion.
08:20The base
08:21is the regime
08:22of the media
08:22and the complementarian
08:24of the capitalization.
08:25It is the discussion
08:25of how many
08:27salarios mínimos
08:28over how many
08:28salarios mínimos
08:29in one and in the other.
08:30And the third one is the
08:31voluntary regime
08:31of the third pilar.
08:33The one who wants
08:34something else
08:34does
08:36do
08:36voluntarily.
08:38That is
08:38the
08:39proposal
08:39to be able to
08:40expand
08:40the
08:41reform
08:43pensional
08:44must have
08:45certain objectives.
08:46The first one
08:48is
08:49to be
08:50to be
08:50to be
08:50to be
08:50to be
08:51to be
08:51to be
08:52to be
08:52to be
08:52to be
08:53to be
08:53to be
08:54to be
08:54to be
08:54streaming
08:55방송
08:55and
08:56to be
08:56knowlaughter.
09:00The legislative
09:02to
09:02be
09:02one Jamie...
09:04Human
09:04Human to
09:10be
09:17able
09:18to to
09:19be the植
09:20agradable
09:20system.
09:20del sistema y la forma más efectiva de esto es considerar eliminar una serie de subsidios
09:27implícitos que ocurren en colpensiones y tercero eliminar una serie de diferencias que generan
09:34desigualdades en la población aunque tengan historiales de contribución diferentes sin
09:40muy similares perdón entonces un afiliado de un afiliado de colpensiones yo y conozco muchas
09:48historias de ese estilo una persona que llega a su edad de pensión se retira conoció un compañero
09:53de trabajo misma historia misma edad contribuyeron el mismo tiempo pero si terminan en colpensiones o
09:58terminan en raíz terminan con con pensiones muy diferentes eso es una fuente de inequidad lo que
10:05llamamos inequidad horizontal entonces esos tres elementos son claves y adicionalmente aquí y es
10:13y es algo importante si bien el sistema no está pensionando mucha gente y por eso necesitamos
10:17el pilar no contributivo aumentarlo y fortalecerlo necesitamos también repensar la estructura bajo la
10:25cual operan el sector privado administrando los recursos de las afp y pensionando con el fin de
10:34obtener pensiones más altas en el sistema de los pensionados de raíz pues nosotros creemos
10:40efectivamente que debería propenderse por un sistema que garantice un ingreso básico mínimo pero
10:47digno para las personas que no tienen la posibilidad de cotizar en un sistema pensión si debe haber una
10:53pensión no contributiva un ingreso básico una renta básica para quienes hoy en día no tienen la
10:59posibilidad de ingresar al sistema pensión un segundo componente debería ser una pensión semi
11:05contributiva es decir subsidiar aquellas personas que tienen unos ingresos pero no tienen suficiente
11:11para ingresar al sistema bueno hay que ayudarles a por ejemplo trabajadores temporales trabajadores
11:15del sector rural a mujeres con personas a cargo que se encargan del cuidado de la economía no remunerada
11:21es decir a ellos y ellas no hay que excluirlos del sistema como se está haciendo con el sistema de
11:26piso protección social sino que hay que subsidiarles para que ingresen al sistema para que aporten y para
11:32que puedan aspirar a una pensión previsible con un monto determinado y un tercer sistema pues que ya
11:39sería el contributivo pleno que nosotros preferiríamos que fuera un sistema de reparto un sistema solidario
11:44donde el dinero de los cotizantes ingrese al sistema que está reconociendo y que está pagando realmente las
11:51pensiones y se quiere mantener un modelo de ahorro individual administrado por privados pues debería
11:57dejárseles a ellos simplemente una parte de las personas que más ganan de los ingresos más altos que si
12:03quieren hacer un ahorro voluntario si quieren estar en un sistema de pensiones adicionales más allá de las mínimas
12:10que debe garantizar el estado pues no hay que descartar esa idea mientras para algunos es viable dejar solo el
12:16pilar voluntario en manos de las AFP para otros la complementariedad es la respuesta irnos a cualquiera de los dos
12:24extremos
12:25sería un error en colpensiones lo que se ahorra no alcanza para la pensión entonces puede que hoy se recoja
12:32más plata pero mañana en el futuro habrá una deuda más grande entonces sólo colpensiones nos lleva a una
12:40bomba fiscal financiera en algún momento sólo ahorro individual como la plata como la pensión a diferencia en
12:49colpensiones donde depende del promedio del salario independientemente del ahorrado en ahorro individual
12:55depende del ahorro y el ahorro es bajitico lo que tenemos si nos vamos sólo ahorro individual es una
13:00bomba social porque las pensiones son muy bajas por esto esta complementariedad muy importante la
13:07reforma pensional debe ser una prioridad del próximo gobierno del congreso y de la sociedad la
13:13administración del presidente iván duque aseguró que presentaría una reforma pensional pero de eso sólo
13:18quedaron promesas otro elemento que queda sobre la mesa tiene que ver con la importancia de atar la
13:24reforma pensional a una reforma laboral los expertos también coinciden en que la discusión sobre las
13:30pensiones tiene que darse de cara a la gente no puede ser un debate a puerta cerrada con los
13:35congresistas si bien es un pulso que se define en la arena política las pensiones son un tema estructural
13:41que sobrepasa por mucho las ambiciones y las trampas políticas de fondo y como ya se dijo aquí lo que
13:48está en juego es el bienestar en la vejez de millones de colombianos especialmente de quienes
13:53menos seguridad económica tiene no vale prometer y no cumplir discutir a puerta cerrada o pasar
13:58leyes a punta de jugaditas hay demasiado un juego como para hacerlo de siempre
Comments

Recommended