Pino Rinaldi racconta l'indagine sull'omicidio di Manuela Murgia, uno dei casi più drammatici della cronaca italiana. Il 29 dicembre 2011 la giovane donna viene trovata senza vita nella sua casa, in circostanze misteriose. Un'inchiesta complessa, tra sospetti e colpi di scena, che ancora oggi lascia aperti molti interrogativi.
#Detectives #ManuelaMurgia #PinoRinaldi #Crime #TrueCrime #Delitti #Misteri #Killer #SerialKiller #ColdCase #Cronaca #CronacaNera #Mistero #Delitto #Documentari #Documentario #Docu #Doc #DivinumCrime
#Detectives #ManuelaMurgia #PinoRinaldi #Crime #TrueCrime #Delitti #Misteri #Killer #SerialKiller #ColdCase #Cronaca #CronacaNera #Mistero #Delitto #Documentari #Documentario #Docu #Doc #DivinumCrime
Categoria
📺
TVTrascrizione
00:00What we are going to tell you about now is a forgotten story, a story that
00:07For a long time neither newspapers nor television have spoken about it anymore, a mystery that has lasted for 30 years.
00:16Doctor Fattori, let's start from that February 5th, 1995. What happened?
00:23Around 12pm an anonymous phone call arrived at our offices reporting the presence of a lifeless body.
00:31inside the Tuvicedu canyon, it is an artificial canyon located in the center of Cagliari.
00:38So, let's go back to that day, February 5th.
00:49The death of a girl is shrouded in mystery.
00:52His body was found in a ravine in the necropolis on the outskirts of Cagliari.
00:57Maybe she was killed.
01:04The inspection data was quite clear.
01:07The body was found in a prone position, therefore with the face turned downwards,
01:13within a canyon one meter away from the edge of a cliff.
01:18The first hypothesis that was put forward during the inspection was that of death due to suffocation.
01:27The coroner, but even the police, even before the coroner arrived,
01:32they talk about dragging.
01:36Because there were fragments of grassy vegetation on the clothes, on the jeans, in the sweater, in the hair.
01:47The coroner was quite clear in his description,
01:51but the interesting thing is also the place where this body was found.
01:56It is a place notoriously frequented by marginalized individuals,
02:01therefore prostitutes or drug addicts.
02:06So at first glance, colleagues believe that it could be a person connected to those environments.
02:13Then the investigations took another turn, because the night before a couple had gone to the police station
02:23to report the disappearance of his daughter, a sixteen-year-old daughter,
02:30whose descriptions practically corresponded exactly to those of the person found there.
02:36And this person is then identified as Emanuela Murgia.
02:40Was she a girl who had drug problems?
02:44Absolutely not. She was described as a very calm and collected girl.
02:50and was part of a family of four children.
02:54So, let's see who Emanuela Murgia was.
03:04We moved to Cagliari in '94, in a somewhat difficult neighborhood,
03:11in a somewhat particular historical period.
03:16They arrive in the Smirionis neighborhood to allow them to attend schools
03:23more comfortably, in an area closer to home, to the children.
03:32The Smirionis neighborhood is sadly famous for the news
03:38because Smirionis' gang was raging there.
03:43In those years Cagliari was experiencing a clash between gangs
03:49who were trying to gain control of the heroin trade.
03:58The school, the environment was more complicated.
04:04We found some kids who were much smarter, let's say, than us.
04:11The move was not, let's say, taken very well by all of us children,
04:15but then slowly our circle of friends and also Manu's
04:19it expanded thanks to the church, the oratory,
04:22in short, to sport.
04:25We are located in the wall of Via Gippi
04:28and this little wall is located exactly in front of the building where Manuela lived.
04:33When you went out here you always found someone to chat with,
04:38to spend a few hours with.
04:42she was a very responsible girl,
04:46she was also a bit of a mother to her sisters.
04:50She was a bit like the little angel who prepared dinner for you.
04:59There was a very sunny, very sweet girl standing next to us,
05:03that was emerging because she was becoming a woman.
05:07Someone didn't give him this opportunity because they took it away from him too soon.
05:15Manuela's story in this video contribution speaks very clearly of murder,
05:23but in 1995, as soon as the body was found,
05:27His colleagues still don't have a clear idea.
05:32The objective data that is also found by forensic medicine
05:37is that she didn't use drugs.
05:42But the environment he could frequent was a dangerous one.
05:48Did Manuela frequent this environment?
05:50We didn't get the impression that he frequented certain environments.
05:58However, friction had emerged within the family.
06:03also due to some acquaintances that the girl intended in a certain way
06:09and the one who frequented it meant it differently.
06:13So you're telling me that Manuela was already seeing someone at 16,
06:19and the family, the mother, the father, didn't want him to hang out with this someone.
06:23Who is this someone?
06:25It was basically a story that had ceased
06:29because the boy was of a more mature age
06:33and this obviously entailed a series of demands from the boy
06:40which Emanuela did not intend to comply with.
06:45And on the other hand the family had also set limits on going out
06:51and in the possibility, for example, of getting into the car with the boyfriend
06:56limits that the girl had in fact disregarded on several occasions.
07:00Was this ex-boyfriend involved in drugs or was he a good guy?
07:04Apparently he had no ties to criminal circles.
07:08and also provided an alibi.
07:12How many hours had it been since we had heard from Manuela?
07:16For about 24 hours, because Manuela had left practically at midday on the 4th
07:23and his body was found about 24 hours later.
07:27You have reconstructed that day, what do you discover?
07:31That Manuela had stayed at home that day, she hadn't attended school for a while.
07:39Why?
07:40Because he had temporarily decided to suspend his studies,
07:44so he basically did the housework.
07:50While her sisters were at school, her mother worked as a housekeeper
07:55and together with a little cousin she had gone to work.
07:58And the father was resting that day, so basically there were only Manuela and the
08:05father.
08:06When does it disappear?
08:08There is immediately a strangeness, because it seemed like a day like any other,
08:13but around 10 in the morning something strange happens.
08:17And Manuela's sister tells us something strange.
08:25My mother had gone to work, but just that morning our little cousin,
08:30who was with my mother, because on Saturdays he stayed with her,
08:34he didn't want to stay with my mother, so my mother was forced to go back home,
08:38around 10 o'clock.
08:40When she comes back, she notices that Manuela, as soon as she sees her, is hiding something under the covers.
08:47They were his clothes, his shoes, in short, his underwear.
08:53So my mother gets angry, precisely because she notices that Manuela was hiding something from her,
08:58he leaves the little girl with Manuela and with my father and my mother he goes back to work.
09:08What is Manuela hiding?
09:12Manuela is definitely hiding her clothes and therefore wants to hide an outing.
09:21So Manuela had left the house trying to simulate her exit to her mother
09:27and had been seen near the post office in Via Montesanto
09:33as if he was waiting for someone.
09:37So a strange circumstance of waiting.
09:41This is the first mystery of this story.
09:44Who was Manuela waiting for?
09:47Did he have an appointment with anyone?
09:50But with whom?
09:52Anyway, when the girl comes back, everything seems to be calm.
09:58We continue the story of that morning with the words of Uncle Massimiliano.
10:10Around 11 I went to my sister's house
10:13and there I found Manuela with my brother-in-law.
10:17Manuela made me a coffee
10:20and I had the opportunity to chat for a quarter of an hour.
10:27Everything was normal.
10:32I left her alone, that's all.
10:40Nothing gave me any idea that within an hour
10:44then I would never have seen her again.
10:51So when the uncle goes home at 11 he finds Manuela.
10:55Evidently she had already returned from her outing.
11:00The uncle stays at home with Manuela and Manuela's father
11:04for about half an hour and then he goes away.
11:07What happens at this point?
11:09It happens that there is a second exit of Manuela
11:14and this time we reconstruct it with an important testimony.
11:19Testimony that tells us some more details too
11:23because it places Emanuela in a car.
11:28We have heard this testimony.
11:32Let's see it.
11:41I live in this building a couple of meters from Manuela's house.
11:47I am the person who saw Manuela inside this car.
11:52It passed right in front of me
11:55while I was here in this window.
12:00It struck me because I knew he didn't have permission
12:05to get in the car with anyone.
12:08She hid her face with her hair
12:11but the look was there from both of them.
12:18I was there at the window ready to hang out the towels
12:22and that's why he takes care of himself 100% which was at noon.
12:30I'm sure of the time because my mother is bedridden.
12:38I had to get the shot before she ate.
12:40so he was late.
12:43The car continued towards Via Mandrolisai.
12:48There he turned left.
12:54The car was like a sedan.
12:58I don't know the brands of the cars.
13:01But there is this, this metallic blue I won't forget.
13:09Whose car is this?
13:12The vehicle is reconnected to the one presumably
13:15in the possession of the ex-boyfriend's cousin
13:19who has a similar vehicle.
13:22However, both the cousin and the
13:25both the ex-boyfriend
13:28and provide alibis.
13:31So either they're lying
13:35or the blue car belonged to someone else.
13:39Is that so?
13:40At the time, no other cars were found
13:43that could match that particular description.
13:48Is there anything else that comes up during those hours?
13:51Well, a rather significant detail
13:55it is given by the presence of the cordless telephone
14:00left almost abandoned by Manuela
14:03on the kitchen table.
14:04A rather singular fact
14:07as if she had moved away
14:09after receiving a call
14:13or after calling someone.
14:16Let's see this video.
14:21Manuela's exit is a motivated exit
14:27motivated by a phone call
14:31so it's clear someone called her
14:33and someone wanted to see it
14:38and that's why at the kitchen table
14:42the judicial police found
14:44that there was cordless
14:45that there was lipstick
14:47and that there was a scent
14:49that Manuela had used
14:51just before leaving the house.
15:00This was Manuela's beauty case
15:03what was found on the table
15:06on the morning of February 4th
15:07and inside we find
15:09her favorite perfume
15:11which probably
15:13indeed certainly
15:14she sprayed herself daily
15:16and we also find his crucifix
15:20to whom she was very attached
15:23and it is from the first communion.
15:30Manuela kept her physical appearance
15:32he took care of us
15:33and that morning
15:36leave the phone
15:38perhaps absentmindedly on the kitchen table
15:41because maybe
15:43he received
15:44a phone call
15:46someone maybe
15:47he gave her an appointment
15:49it has been verified
15:50the telephone user.
15:51At that moment
15:52probably
15:53not much attention is given
15:55to that detail of the cordless phone
15:56so they are not done
15:58this type of investigation.
16:00There are other elements
16:01other things
16:03that come out
16:04during those early days
16:05of the investigation?
16:06A significant fact
16:07it's just that on the 8th
16:10they are found
16:12two objects
16:12that is, a handkerchief
16:14with traces of lipstick
16:15and the wallet
16:17by Emanuela
16:18about 150 meters away
16:20from the place
16:22from the point of discovery
16:23of the corpse.
16:25And what does this mean?
16:26This may mean
16:28who might have lost them
16:32during the journey
16:34as it might have been
16:36dragged
16:37and then
16:39that someone
16:40who dragged her
16:41he didn't realize
16:41that Emanuela
16:43he had those objects
16:45I wear
16:46and then
16:46the traces remained
16:48150 meters away.
16:51We are back
16:52inside that canyon
16:54We see
17:07We meet
17:08in one of the entrances
17:09of the Tuvige canyon
17:10two to be exact
17:11to the next one
17:12on Ismaglias Street
17:14the place where
17:16probably
17:17it was transported
17:18the lifeless body
17:19by Emanuela Murgia
17:20going around a gate
17:22this is what you see
17:23behind my back
17:24that at the time of the facts
17:26presented
17:26a double door
17:31the transport
17:33of this body
17:34in the hypothesis
17:34that it was abandoned
17:36lifeless
17:37or dying
17:37it happened
17:39almost certainly
17:40through
17:40to a hole
17:41side
17:42to this wall
17:49therefore from the elements
17:51until which collected
17:51a picture emerges
17:52of the genre
17:53Emanuela gets ready
17:54and leaves the house
17:55because most likely
17:57he has an appointment
17:58with someone
17:59come on board
18:01of this machine
18:03blue
18:03and at this point
18:04something happens
18:05after which
18:07she is killed
18:08his
18:09or his murderers
18:11they drag
18:13his body
18:14in the canyon
18:14probably
18:16for the purpose
18:16to delay
18:17as much as possible
18:18his discovery
18:20VATTORI
18:22it's like this
18:23the reconstruction
18:26it seems
18:27consistent
18:28but
18:29afterwards
18:30it's the autopsy
18:31that guides
18:33in a manner
18:33definitive
18:35the investigations
18:36Why
18:37on the spot
18:37by Emanuela
18:38they don't come
18:39found
18:40signs of asphyxiation
18:42so it wasn't
18:43strangled
18:44or strangled
18:45on the contrary
18:47are found
18:48a series
18:48of injuries
18:50important
18:51internal
18:52between a lung
18:54and the liver
18:55which therefore
18:56they seem to indicate
18:58death
18:59for another cause
19:00Therefore
19:01the investigations
19:02they emerge
19:03let's say
19:04a bit
19:04a stop
19:05but then
19:07what happened
19:08Emanuela
19:09the investigations
19:10after just a few days
19:12they take
19:13a fold
19:14unexpected
19:19the autopsy
19:21it ended
19:22with a hypothesis
19:24of a great trauma
19:25by precipitation
19:26likely
19:28suicidal
19:29Emanuela
19:31Murgia
19:32she committed suicide
19:33the girl
19:34it would have been
19:34launched
19:35in the void
19:36falling
19:36from a height
19:37of approximately
19:3720 meters
19:41as time goes by
19:42of the days
19:43what was
19:43the certainty
19:44of a murder
19:46to the detriment
19:47of a girl
19:4716 years old
19:48becomes
19:49a suicide
19:51what
19:52ago
19:53to stretch out
19:53for suicide
19:54it is inevitably
19:55the place
19:56where it is found
19:57Emanuela Murgia
20:00it's clear
20:01that when
20:02the body
20:03of any person
20:04is found
20:05in conclusion
20:05to a canyon
20:06if he doesn't come
20:07immediately
20:08to the light
20:09someone who can
20:11to have pushed
20:11that body
20:12the thing that is thought
20:13is that that person
20:15she threw herself
20:20After that
20:21there is also something to say
20:21that in those days
20:23it also started
20:23to outline
20:24a psychological profile
20:25by Emanuela
20:27right in the pages
20:28of the Sardinian Union
20:30of 1995
20:31there is an article
20:33that to me
20:34personally
20:34has always struck
20:35in which
20:36Emanuela was coming
20:37described as
20:37Cinderella
20:38on the outskirts
20:39so one
20:40can think
20:40that the girl
20:41had been
20:42somehow
20:42victim
20:43of constraints
20:45at family level
20:52professor
20:53Giannini
20:54she's a Cinderella
20:56That
20:57yes it is
20:58wanted
21:00kill
21:01in general
21:02the methodology
21:02which is used
21:03to learn more
21:04that's it
21:05of the psychological autopsy
21:06that is, we go
21:07to search
21:08at the level
21:08very thorough
21:09in history
21:11of life
21:11of the person
21:12if there are elements
21:13but that
21:13must be
21:14significant elements
21:15because it's not enough
21:16think
21:17to family tensions
21:18and to sadness
21:19Here you are
21:20here are the elements
21:20significant
21:21they don't seem like it
21:22so clear
21:23it's not that
21:24family tensions
21:25in itself
21:26can trigger
21:27a conduct
21:28so serious
21:28Thank you
21:33Dr. Fattori
21:35help me understand
21:38Manuela
21:38Therefore
21:39it would have been
21:40thrown
21:41from the top
21:42of this canyon
21:43but the signs
21:45of dragging
21:47those objects
21:48found
21:49150 meters away
21:51from the body
21:51if it were
21:53launched
21:54thrown down
21:56they shouldn't
21:57to have been
21:58in front of
21:59to an expert opinion
22:00medico-legal
22:01which certifies
22:02essentially
22:03writableness
22:04of death
22:06to a precipitation
22:07these elements
22:09they don't come
22:09most considered
22:11and in 97
22:13the case
22:13is archived
22:19Dr. De Gioia
22:21what are the mechanisms
22:22lawyers who bring
22:24to archiving?
22:25when you don't have it
22:26of elements
22:27that allow
22:28an evaluation
22:30reasonable
22:31on the statement
22:31of responsibility
22:33the investigations
22:34must be
22:35archived
22:36the investigations
22:37they can't last
22:38forever
22:38for the most serious crimes
22:40as for example
22:40voluntary homicide
22:42the deadline
22:43it's two years old
22:43which can be
22:44also extended
22:45after you have to
22:47or send to trial
22:48or archive
22:49at this point
22:50of history
22:51for the case
22:52by Manuela Murgia
22:53there wouldn't be any
22:54more doubts
22:54Manuela
22:55it would have been removed
22:56life
22:57in the newspapers
22:58this story
23:00disappears quickly
23:01and the memory
23:02which remains
23:03that's it
23:04of a girl
23:05simple
23:06Good
23:06and unlucky
23:07what a beautiful day
23:08he decided
23:09that this world
23:10it was no longer
23:11for her
23:12but there is another one
23:14young woman
23:15that in the meantime
23:16is growing
23:18is putting together
23:19his memories
23:21and one fine day
23:22decide
23:23that no
23:24it can't be
23:26this is the ending
23:31in 2012
23:32Elizabeth Murgia
23:34the sister
23:35by Manuela
23:36he introduces himself
23:36in the prosecutor's office
23:37because precisely
23:38they come to her
23:39of memories
23:40when the sister
23:43she died
23:43it was very small
23:45he suffered
23:47a trauma
23:47before remembering
23:48those days
23:49years have passed since then
23:52they resurface
23:53some things
23:54which probably
23:55they had not been said
23:57at the time
23:59a few days
24:00before his death
24:01together with my mother
24:02we note
24:03that from the chandelier
24:04of the bathroom
24:05which was a ceiling light
24:06for a gust of wind
24:08they start to fly
24:09some money
24:10they were banknotes
24:12from 5
24:12from 1000 lire
24:13but in total
24:15there were many
24:16my mother
24:17she was shocked
24:21Manuela justified them
24:22like gifts
24:25it's not that
24:27this could be
24:30one of the many reasons
24:32because then she
24:32he is not here with us today
24:37about a month before
24:39since his death
24:39in January
24:40of 95
24:41they were arriving
24:42these calls
24:44she at most
24:46he nodded
24:46and he answered
24:47with some statements
24:48Yes
24:49or a denial
24:50No
24:50it wasn't a direct dialogue
24:52and at the end
24:54at the conclusion
24:56Manuela began
24:57always crying
24:58Always
24:59arriving then
25:00just a few days ago
25:01before his death
25:02two days before
25:03Manuela was
25:04lying in bed
25:06he covered his head
25:07he was crying
25:08it was a desperate cry
25:09I tried to ask her
25:11but what's happening to you
25:12you can tell me
25:13because we have
25:14always talked about everything
25:17Manuela answers her
25:18I can't tell you
25:20otherwise
25:21I'll get you in trouble
25:22and the public prosecutor
25:24decides that
25:25these elements
25:25they are elements
25:26circumstantial evidence
25:27very important
25:28for which he decides
25:29to reopen the investigations
25:34tolvi of which no one knows
25:36the origin
25:37mysterious phone calls
25:40Dr. Fattori
25:42everything
25:44It seems to take us back
25:46over time
25:47When
25:47the police
25:49he was working
25:50on this case
25:51like murder
25:53this reopening
25:54of the investigations
25:55what does it mean
25:58and where is it leading?
26:00this new reopening
26:02which is done
26:03around 2012
26:03leads to a series
26:05of insights
26:07and activities
26:08more invasive
26:09and they come
26:10listened to again
26:11the witnesses
26:11from the time
26:12new ones are made
26:13activity
26:14Surely
26:15more penetrating
26:16but then
26:17the prosecutor's office
26:18he doesn't think so
26:20to have
26:20elements
26:22sufficient
26:23towards
26:24possible
26:25under investigation
26:26and then
26:27asks
26:28and gets
26:29the archiving
26:30of the case
26:30it couldn't be done
26:32otherwise
26:33but death
26:33mysterious
26:34of a sister
26:35you can't
26:35really forget
26:37Like this
26:37past
26:38another ten years
26:39to the voice
26:40by Elizabeth
26:40Murgia
26:41joins
26:42that one too
26:43of the other two
26:44brothers
26:45Anna Maria
26:45and Joelle
26:46supported
26:47also from the rest
26:48of the family
26:49this time
26:50the brothers
26:51Murgia
26:51they rely on
26:52to a pool
26:53of experts
26:54lawyers
26:54consultants
26:55that step by step
26:57they try to demolish
26:58once and for all
26:59the suicide thesis
27:01and understand
27:01what it really is
27:03success
27:03to Manuela
27:04there is a first
27:06and fundamental
27:07I wait
27:07which contrasts
27:09with
27:09the hypothesis
27:10of suicide
27:11and it concerns
27:12own
27:12the point
27:13from which
27:14Manuela
27:14it would have been
27:15thrown away
27:19at this point
27:21we meet
27:22in the exact place
27:23in which
27:23according to the photographs
27:25of the investigators
27:25it was found
27:26the body
27:27by Manuela
27:28Murgia
27:29this is another one
27:30image
27:31recovery
27:32from one point
27:33of sight
27:33within
27:35of the canyon
27:35which shows
27:36Always
27:38red
27:38the trajectory
27:39to reach
27:40this area
27:41with the red dot
27:42it is indicated
27:42the point
27:43approximately
27:44the area
27:44where was it
27:45found
27:46the corpse
27:46by Manuela
27:46Murgia
27:47and obviously
27:49the point
27:50of possible
27:51fall
27:52precipitation
27:53it's here
27:53on the top
27:54of the canyon
27:59There are
28:00Between
28:02the little road
28:03that rises
28:04here on the
28:04ridge
28:06and his
28:07edge
28:08I am however
28:10interposed
28:10of the networks
28:11metallic
28:12with barbed wire
28:14so it's not
28:14easy
28:15absolutely
28:16reach
28:16the ridge
28:17of the wall
28:22so he would have
28:23as due
28:24take a leap
28:25at the obstacle
28:27at a distance
28:27of almost
28:28we can evaluate it
28:30about
28:3015 meters
28:31of jump
28:32and then
28:32of flight
28:33next
28:41doctor
28:42factors
28:42but
28:43Manuela
28:44could have
28:47to climb over
28:48those networks
28:49theoretically
28:50Yes
28:51but in fact
28:53it's about
28:54of networks
28:55placed
28:57in a manner
28:57let's say
28:58narrow
28:59And
29:00above all
29:00with the presence
29:02of barbed wire
29:03Therefore
29:03it is to be excluded
29:05that can
29:06essentially
29:08to have jumped over
29:09easily
29:09those networks
29:10the engineer
29:11Ferrigno
29:11consultant
29:12of the family
29:13Murgia
29:14last year
29:15he presented
29:16an expert opinion
29:17in which
29:17highlights
29:18another one too
29:19element
29:20of fundamental
29:21importance
29:22we remember
29:23which until that moment
29:24the official data
29:26they reported
29:27that Manuela
29:28it would have been
29:28thrown
29:29from a height
29:3020 meters
29:40once
29:41identified
29:42the point
29:43of stasis
29:43on the ground
29:43the possible
29:45point
29:46of precipitation
29:47above
29:48of the ridge
29:49of the canyon
29:49era
29:50evidently
29:51identified
29:51that too
29:55what I have
29:56I was able to verify
29:58was
29:59the height
29:59not inferior
30:00at 30 meters
30:01from me
30:02estimated
30:02in approximately
30:0235 meters
30:08considering
30:08that the height
30:09what we're talking about
30:10Therefore
30:10over 30 meters
30:11it is anyway
30:12the average height
30:13of a palace
30:1310-story
30:14he brought
30:15to the value
30:16of speed
30:17on impact
30:17on the ground
30:18of approximately
30:1890 km per hour
30:24a body
30:25that falls
30:26for 35 meters
30:27and impacts
30:28on the ground
30:28with a speed
30:29of 90 km per hour
30:31it's a body
30:32which presents
30:33a series
30:33of harmfulness
30:34large
30:35at the level
30:36fractured
30:37internal
30:39at the level
30:40autopsy
30:41there wasn't
30:42a big one
30:42trauma
30:43cranial
30:43there wasn't
30:44a big one
30:45payment
30:45thoracic
30:46of blood
30:47there wasn't
30:47a serious one
30:48hemorrhage
30:49quantified
30:52it didn't seem like it
30:53there were
30:53fractures
30:54at the level
30:55of the limbs
30:56nor even less
30:56of the head
30:57consequentially
30:58this hypothesis
30:59of precipitation
31:00it is based
31:01on nothing
31:04doctor
31:06Factors
31:07the coroner
31:09Francesco Introna
31:10it's extremely clear
31:12Emanuela
31:13Murgia
31:14she didn't throw herself away
31:16his body
31:18he didn't fall
31:20from that height
31:22And
31:24Therefore
31:26excluding
31:28the precipitation
31:29it's likely
31:32that can
31:33have
31:34had
31:35an impact
31:36with
31:37another one
31:38surface
31:39which could be
31:40for example
31:40an investment
31:42road
31:42Doctor Fattori
31:44what does it have to do with it?
31:45Now
31:45the investment
31:46road
31:47we are practically
31:48speaking
31:48of an impact
31:50which is never
31:50happened
31:51according to Introna
31:52from that height
31:54and she now
31:54he speaks to me
31:55of another
31:55impact
31:56that
31:56of a machine
31:58what does it mean
31:59this thing
32:00it means that
32:01internal injuries
32:03detected
32:04more than
32:05from precipitation
32:06they appear compatible
32:08with a sort
32:08of investment
32:09certainly not
32:10an investment
32:11random
32:12but an investment
32:13voluntary
32:15Emanuela
32:16for reasons
32:17that we don't know
32:18at least for now
32:19it would have been
32:20invested
32:22from a machine
32:23and at that point
32:24what would have happened
32:25and at that point
32:26Then
32:28lifeless
32:29was
32:30dragged
32:31and here it is
32:32that we could
32:33explain
32:33those elements
32:35collected
32:36at the time
32:37of the facts
32:37and that is
32:38the dragging
32:40and then
32:40the loss
32:41of wallets
32:42of the handkerchief
32:44soaked
32:45by Rossetto
32:45who came
32:47found
32:47150 meters away
32:49from the corpse
32:50so after that
32:51many years
32:52all that work
32:53investigative
32:54that his colleagues
32:55they did
32:55in those days
32:57before
32:58an expert opinion
32:59medico-legal
33:00wrong
33:01we can say it
33:02Today
33:03with an absolute
33:05certainty
33:07defined
33:08death
33:09by Emanuela
33:10Murgia
33:11like a suicide
33:12all those
33:13investigations
33:14Instead
33:15they were proceeding
33:17towards the direction
33:18right
33:18probably
33:20Yes
33:20they were going
33:21in one direction
33:23different
33:24That
33:25somehow
33:26it is compatible
33:28with the
33:28conclusions
33:29current
33:30there are others
33:31elements
33:32that I am
33:32emerged
33:33a particular
33:34Meaning what
33:35that Emanuela
33:36he brought with him
33:37an amulet
33:37he shows it to me
33:39there is some
33:39Exactly
33:40this amulet
33:42is he giving it to you?
33:43Yes
33:44This
33:45amulet
33:47it means
33:47something
33:49of extremely
33:49important
33:50from that
33:50that's what I'm looking for
33:51saying
33:51what is his name?
33:53Ispungas
33:54and was found
33:55in a pocket
33:57by Emanuela
33:58let's see how important it is
33:59this object
34:00in this story
34:06in the pocket
34:07To the right
34:08some jeans
34:09by Emanuela
34:09was found
34:10an object
34:11who came
34:11noted
34:12from the agents
34:13in service
34:14like an amulet
34:16or pincushion
34:17actually
34:19it was about
34:20of an object
34:21sacred
34:22Ispungas
34:23this object
34:24it was used
34:24bring it
34:25hooked
34:26to the clothes
34:27intimate
34:28was found
34:30precisely
34:30in one place
34:32anomalous
34:32which pocket
34:33some jeans
34:33the parents
34:35they always have
34:36affirmed
34:37that Emanuela
34:38he was wearing
34:39Always
34:39the vest
34:41both
34:42to the question
34:43of the tenants
34:44if something was missing
34:45of the clothes
34:46of the victim
34:46they were reporting
34:47that was missing
34:48the vest
34:52it seems to me
34:53an element
34:54extremely
34:55important
34:55This
34:56Why
34:56Emanuela
34:57when it comes
34:58found
34:59corpse
34:59he doesn't have
35:01the vest
35:02this what it means
35:04This
35:05Surely
35:06it means
35:07That
35:07she undressed
35:09or
35:10someone
35:11he stripped her
35:12in support
35:13of this thesis
35:14Also
35:15other elements
35:16that support
35:18this thesis
35:18Why
35:19the clothes
35:20by Emanuela
35:21in particular
35:22the mayonnaise
35:24that he was wearing
35:25at the moment
35:25of the discovery
35:27presented
35:28of the tracks
35:28of grass
35:29and soil
35:30within
35:31Therefore
35:31it's a thing
35:32Enough
35:32unusual
35:33That
35:33the exterior
35:34not present
35:35the tracks
35:36and the interior
35:37of the mayonnaise
35:38Yes
35:38at the same time
35:40way
35:40the Montgomery
35:41that he was wearing
35:42did not present
35:43no trace
35:44as if
35:44someone
35:45had it
35:45dressed
35:46subsequently
35:47these
35:48elements
35:50they make us
35:50think
35:51to revisit
35:53totally
35:53the case
35:54among other things
35:55this ours
35:56new
35:56reconstruction
35:57is supported
35:58from one
35:59expertise
35:59medico-legal
36:00recent
36:01of the professor
36:02De Montis
36:03That
36:04on the basis
36:05of the exam
36:05photographic
36:07snapped
36:08in phase
36:09autopsy
36:10detects
36:11the presence
36:12of some
36:13traces
36:14of a possible
36:15violence
36:16or of a relationship
36:18sexual
36:18violent
36:19about the girl
36:21what can we do?
36:22imagine
36:23respect
36:24to that
36:24which could
36:25to be
36:25happened
36:26to Emanuela
36:27Before
36:28that he came
36:29abandoned
36:31in that canyon
36:32based on
36:34to the hypothesis
36:35pure
36:35formulated
36:36from the professor
36:37De Montis
36:37we can
36:38to say that
36:39Emanuela
36:40could be
36:41to have been
36:42somehow
36:43stripped naked
36:44or anyway
36:45yes it is
36:46covered
36:47rectally
36:48and at that moment
36:49could be
36:50to have been
36:51invested
36:52and subsequently
36:53someone
36:54he has it
36:54flow rate
36:56purely
36:57in that place
36:58let's say
36:59out
36:59from the looks
37:00indiscreet
37:01hiding it
37:02the corpse
37:03everyone
37:04these elements
37:05they can't
37:06to be
37:06left alone
37:08I can say
37:09Now
37:10officially
37:11that the prosecution
37:12from Cagliari
37:13has reopened
37:14the case
37:15this choice
37:17it seems
37:17right
37:19as well as
37:19inevitable
37:20but now
37:22what can we do?
37:23wait for us
37:25at a distance
37:2530 years old
37:27After
37:28what
37:29he just told us
37:30the doctor
37:31Factors
37:31after this
37:33reopening
37:34of the
37:36case
37:37Of
37:37Emanuela
37:38Morgia
37:44We hope
37:45to arrive
37:46first of all
37:47to one
37:47resurrection
37:51Why
37:51it's as if
37:52the truth
37:53had an account
37:54pending
37:55with us
37:58only from there
37:59we will be able to
37:59to draw
38:00to some new ones
38:02information
38:03Perhaps
38:03of the tracks
38:04organic
38:04Perhaps
38:05We hope
38:09without a doubt
38:10without a doubt
38:11the police
38:11judicial
38:12of then
38:13we are talking
38:14of 95
38:15he didn't have
38:17the tools
38:18that exist
38:19Today
38:19Today
38:20we have proof
38:22prince
38:22which is DNA
38:27Nothing
38:27prohibits
38:28that they can
38:29to be
38:29of the investigations
38:30Still
38:31feasible
38:31that could
38:32to support
38:33the hypothesis
38:33of a
38:34violence
38:35sexual
38:35or of
38:36other
38:38if we
38:39Today
38:39we have
38:40a
38:40summary
38:41we will have
38:41Surely
38:42the possibility
38:43to find
38:43fractures
38:44where
38:45present
38:45that not
38:46they were
38:46views
38:47on site
38:47autopsy
38:49on the body
38:50they couldn't
38:51still be there
38:52of the evidence
38:53always deriving
38:54from elements
38:55that analyzed
38:57there can be
38:57give DNA
39:05everyone
39:06they say
39:07the same thing
39:08it is necessary
39:09to exhume
39:10the body
39:11by Manuela
39:12there are others
39:13trade
39:15that can
39:15to be
39:16undertaken
39:17to reach
39:18the goal
39:20arrive
39:21to the truth
39:22on this
39:23crime
39:23Surely
39:25Yes
39:25And
39:26to the light
39:27of the new ones
39:28technologies
39:28we can
39:29think
39:31Of
39:31analyze
39:32the finds
39:34some
39:35That
39:36they came
39:37at the time
39:37returned
39:38to the family
39:39others
39:40I'm from
39:41find
39:41because actually
39:42they were not
39:43recovered
39:44but
39:44beyond
39:45to the finds
39:46we are
39:47here
39:47to do
39:48an appeal
39:49so that
39:50maybe
39:51signals
39:52and let us do it
39:54to arrive
39:55his
39:56testimony
39:57even in shape
39:58anonymous
39:58and also
39:59through
40:00your
40:00transmission
Commenti