Skip to playerSkip to main content
SAGIP Party-list Rep. Paolo Marcoleta claimed that Vice President Sara Duterte’s SALN was not raised in the original impeachment complaints.

However, Rep. Bienvenido Abante Jr. and Chairperson Gerville Luistro disputed this, pointing to physical evidence showing that the SALN was mentioned in the documents.

Marcoleta later acknowledged that the SALN was indeed cited in the original complaints but argued that it had not been attached at the time. In response, Luistro reiterated the committee’s position, adding that they would rely on the Supreme Court for any necessary action.

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5664f6TkaeHgwBly50DWZQ/join

Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! - https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin

Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin

#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Honorable Mark Coletta, please understand that you are not a member of the Justice Committee.
00:04You're allowed to manifest, but you cannot raise clarificatory questions to the resource persons.
00:10I'm about to raise a manifestation, ma'am, about the SAL-N, ma'am.
00:16First of all, let me state on record that the SAL-Ns discussed were not attached in the original complaints.
00:23They didn't join the original complaints.
00:26And using the SAL-Ns as a starting point without necessary predicate evidence supports the position
00:34that the investigation of the House of Representatives Committee on Justice is a phishing expedition.
00:44And if I may add, Madam Chair, on the SAL-N issue,
00:51the complaint asks this committee to obtain bank records, SAL-Ns, coordinate with the AMLC,
00:59and the forensic accounting.
01:02If so, it is an acknowledgement that the complaint is still seeking the very facts it needs
01:08to conclusively prove its SAL-N theory.
01:11Ma'am, malaki po kasi yung pinagkaiba ng isang complaint that already alleges ultimate facts
01:20supported by evidence,
01:22and a complaint that substantially requests this committee to authorize this committee to investigate,
01:31and perhaps we will later find the proof.
01:42And if I also raise this observation, Madam,
01:53regarding the Ombudsman,
01:56the independence of the Ombudsman may be put to question before this body.
02:00The House of Representatives Committee on Justice summons the Ombudsman before the members of Congress
02:06and the public to present the statement of assets, liabilities, and net worth of the Vice President,
02:12while the Ombudsman has an ongoing investigation before its office.
02:17The Ombudsman is mandated to have the primary duty to conduct investigations
02:21over the misconduct of public officers.
02:24Madam Chair, point of order.
02:27There's a point of order, Honorable Marcoleta.
02:29I just would like to clarify.
02:31Honorable Bishop Abante.
02:33I would like to clarify, to ask the Congressman Marcoleta,
02:39sinabi niya kanina, hindi kasama yung SAL-N sa original complaint.
02:44Yes, he mentioned that.
02:46I'd like to clarify.
02:48Paano niya nasabi yun?
02:49Kasama eh.
02:50Ito, abasahin ko.
02:53Vice President Sara Duterte committed culpable violation of the Constitution
03:00and betrayed the public trust in amassing unexplained wealth
03:05and failing to disclose all her properties and interest in properties in her SAL-N.
03:13Nagalagay po sa complaint eh.
03:15Anong sinasabi niya, kaya hindi kasama sa original complaint?
03:20I'd like to find out from him.
03:23Honorable Marcoleta.
03:32And if I may add, for the guidance of the Honorable Members
03:37and in response to the manifestation of the Honorable Marcoleta,
03:41I will be reading the specific paragraph where matters concerning SAL-N was mentioned in the complaint.
03:49With regards to Sabalia complaint, there are allegations in Paragraph 107, 108, 109,
03:59and Paragraphs 285 to 290.
04:03And for Cabrera complaint, may we refer the Honorable Marcoleta as well
04:07to Paragraph 20.3, Paragraph 76, Paragraph 77, Paragraph 232, Paragraph 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241,
04:27242,
04:28and even from Paragraphs 244 to 246.
04:31For the information of the Honorable Marcoleta,
04:35Yes ma'am, binanggit po ang...
04:35Mentioned paragraphs, contained allegations, which are relevant to the SAL-N's of the respondent.
04:41Yes ma'am, it was mentioned, I think, very adequately, the word SAL-N's,
04:47but they were never attached to the original complaints.
04:53Parang this complaint is also, is just merely requesting the committee to produce evidence.
05:00Ibig sabihin, wala pang ebidensya, nakikiusap sa committee na ito para magproduce ng ebidensya na wala,
05:07hindi nakakabit sa original complaints.
05:11Yun lang po ang sinasabi ko ma'am.
05:12In other words, you admit that there were a lot of times that SAL-N's were mentioned in the impeachment
05:18complaint,
05:19however, they were never attached.
05:21They were not attached in the impeachment complaint.
05:23Hala pang ebidensya na nakalakip doon po sa complaint.
05:28At ngayon pa lang po natin binubuksan,
05:31dahil ito po ay kumbaga request ng complainan.
05:35Please understand as well that the compulsory process that was granted to the Justice Committee
05:41is for the purpose of testing the sufficiency of the allegations in the complaint,
05:48whether the same constitute probable cause, which is the mandate of this proceeding.
05:52So, with all due respect, Honorable Markoleta,
05:56it is our humble position that all the actions of this committee,
06:02including the issuance of subpoena of all this question SAL-N's,
06:07by Your Honor,
06:10is in accordance with the rules of impeachment,
06:14the Constitution,
06:15and even with the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court.
06:19Ma'am, the court will be the better judge of that.
06:24And that is why you should elevate that before the Honorable Court?
06:28Maybe not me, but some other parties.
06:30Thank you, Madam Chair.
06:48Thank you, Madam Chair.
06:48Thanks, Madam Chair.
06:48You
Comments

Recommended