Skip to playerSkip to main content
Romualdez not barred from leaving PH, says lawyer

Ade Fajardo, legal counsel of former Speaker Martin Romualdez, reiterates that his client is not barred from leaving the country. stressing that an immigration lookout bulletin order is only issued against him, which does not prohibit travel but simply requires prior coordination with authorities. He also said that the Anti Money-Laundering Council should file a formal freeze order application before the Court of Appeals.

VIDEO FROM OFFICE OF REP. MARTIN ROMUALDEZ

Check out our Streaming Channel: https://streaming.manilatimes.net/

Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe

Visit our website at [https://www.manilatimes.net](https://www.manilatimes.net/)

Follow us:
Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook
Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram
Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter
DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion

Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital

Check out our Podcasts:
Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify
Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts
Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic
Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer
Tune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein

#TheManilaTimes
#TMTNews
#Romualdez
#Philippines
Transcript
00:00Good afternoon. This is Ade Fajardo, a legal practitioner based in Pasig City.
00:05This is in response to the statements made by Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulia earlier today.
00:14First, later Representative Ferdinand Martin-Girom Waldez is not barred from leaving the country.
00:21What exists, if any, is an immigration lookout bulletin order
00:26which does not prohibit travel but simply requires prior coordination with authorities.
00:32In fact, Representative Romwaldez sought travel authority in all good faith
00:38and this authority has been granted.
00:41This underscores his full compliance with the law and negates any insinuation of flight risk.
00:48Second, on the reported request for a freeze order under the law,
00:53the Anti-Money Laundering Council must file a formal application before the Court of Appeals,
00:59supported by evidence, before any freeze order may be issued.
01:04As of this time, we have received no official notice of any such application or order.
01:10Any statement suggesting that a freeze order is imminent remains speculative.
01:16Third, as to the supposed case, there is no filed charge before the Office of the Ombudsman or any court.
01:25Statements about the cases being prepared do not equate to an actual prosecution.
01:33We urge caution against drawing conclusions from incomplete or unofficial information.
01:41Representative Romwaldez has consistently respected legal processes and will continue to do so.
01:49If and when any formal action is taken, we will respond fully and appropriately before the proper forum.
01:57Until then, these remain unverified claims.
02:02And our client is entitled to the presumption of innocence.
02:06The presumption of innocence.
02:37The presumption of innocence.
02:38The presumption of innocence.
02:38The presumption of innocence.
02:39The presumption of innocence.
02:40The presumption of innocence.
02:40The presumption of innocence.
02:40The presumption of innocence.
Comments

Recommended