Skip to playerSkip to main content
Britain's Almost Perfect Murders Season 1 Episode 2
#
Bölüm
Link Tele duyurusu: https://t.me/CinemaSeriesUSFilm
"Bu videoyu beğendiyseniz ve gece geç saatlerdeki kahve ihtiyaçlarımızı karşılamamıza yardımcı olarak ekibimizi desteklemek istiyorsanız, lütfen PayPal aracılığıyla bağış yapın! ☕️
Küçük bir hareket – büyük bir etki. Hepinize çok teşekkürler! ❤️"
Bağış yapmak için: [https://www.paypal.me/ngaxo]
🎬 Reality :Reality Movies TV – Türk dizilerinin buluştuğu yer 🌍
📺 Tam İngilizce altyazı, tüm diziler hızla güncelleniyor
💖 En yeni gişe rekorları kıran filmlerle sınırsız eğlence ✨
👉 Hepsini izlemek için hemen katılın!
🔗 Resmi Kanal: [https://dailymotion.com/pulseframe]
👉 Tag : #

#RealityMoviesTV
#dramazel
#TurkishDrama
#TurkishSeries
#EngSubTurkishDrama
#TurkishMovies
#TurkishDramaWithSubtitles
#TurkishRomance
#TurkishDramaFans
#TurkishSeriesEnglishSub
#TurkishTVShows
#Turkmenistan
#TürkDizileri
#TürkFilmleri
#TürkDraması
#TürkDizisi
#TürkSineması
Transcript
00:01The perfect murder, the unsolvable crime, does it really exist?
00:08In a TV first, we reveal the cutting-edge technology
00:12now used by British police to join the dots
00:15and reveal new evidence in all homicide investigations.
00:19I'm Tim Tate. I've been an investigative journalist for almost 50 years.
00:26I'm Sam Robbins and I'm a criminal intelligence analyst.
00:30For over 20 years, I've worked alongside detectives on major murder investigations.
00:34Together, in this new series, we are going to discover the fatal mistakes
00:39which prevented the perfect murder from ever being committed.
01:06If you are missing a couple, you won't go to the other university,
01:08and you're a criminal justice.
01:08The time you're missing a local crime is the existence of the substance.
01:08I've been a and a and an active detective.
01:09It's reallyammen-based, and very dangerous.
01:11or take a run a disciple.
01:13I just feel a bit different to learn a little bit over it.
01:14I'm a man-made liar and a young woman and a young woman.
01:15There's no man in the normal life of a companion.
01:17I was a man-made liar.
01:24The one on his own brother called a man-made liar.
01:25For about five years, Carol Ray thought she had got away with a double murder.
01:33Her husband and disabled daughter died in a fire.
01:37She had deliberately started at their council home in West Yorkshire.
01:43Carol posed as a victim and a hero,
01:47and she even got a commendation from the coroner at the inquest into her husband and daughter's death.
01:56But murder will always out.
02:06From start to finish, this is like a classical Greek tragedy.
02:11It's only going to end one way.
02:13The benefit that we've got in this case is that we're able to look at it retrospectively
02:17and what is quite telling here is the pattern of behaviour.
02:21So you're looking at triggers and then the acts of arson that Carol Ray undertakes.
02:27At the time these crimes and these police investigations took place,
02:32was this sort of timeline analysis a thing?
02:37Analysis in this country started to take off in the early 90s, really,
02:42and then it's grown from there.
02:43So we've now got the benefit of about 30 years' worth of crime intelligence analysis
02:48as a profession and as a career.
02:51Let's start with what we know about Carol Ray and her early life.
02:56Yes.
02:56I think it's fair to say this is a fairly tragic tale from start to finish.
03:02So Carol was born Carol Stoker in Hartlepool in 1957.
03:10Carol Ray was born to Linda and John Stoker.
03:13She was one of seven children.
03:15She had an unremarkable childhood.
03:18But at the age of 11, her father started sexually abusing her.
03:26That undoubtedly had an impact on her growing up.
03:29She was only 11 when that first happened.
03:32That would be something which really would have impacted on her ability to interact with other people,
03:39particularly trusting men.
03:41And lots of cases we see like this often turn out to be quite tragic for the victim of these
03:47crimes.
03:50And it's not to excuse what she's done later on,
03:53but really it's something that will have impacted on her personality and her ability to grow as a person.
04:02It's so important to understand the background of any offenders and any victims
04:08to see what's happened in their past that could have caused them to take the path that they've taken.
04:14And sexual abuse beginning at the age of 11 is going to be a key trigger.
04:19Yes. Those are such formative years, aren't they?
04:21And when it's at the hands of someone that should be wholeheartedly trusted and is there to protect you,
04:27I can only imagine how traumatic that is.
04:30Carol tries to get away from her father and her family.
04:34She does.
04:36She ran away and made her way to the Halifax area and got herself a job.
04:41There she met Richard Ray.
04:45Carol's relationship with Richard was a sort of childhood sweetheart thing.
04:50She was infatuated with him. He was her supervisor at work.
04:55She stole him from another woman. She saw him as a love of her life.
05:00She meets Richard, who goes on to become her husband.
05:03Very early on in 1970. So she's 14 at that time.
05:09Which is probably an effort to try and move away because by 15, she's pregnant and has Mary her first
05:17child.
05:17So in 1971.
05:19Let's talk about her early married life. What sort of conditions is she living in?
05:26Carol's second child, Sean, is born in 1973.
05:30And then in 1974, Amanda is born as she has physical disabilities.
05:36That's an incredibly difficult dynamic.
05:39You've already got two children. You now have a child that has got extra needs.
05:42You're not very well off.
05:44You've got a husband who is drinking quite heavily and you've got a father that is abusing you.
05:50So in terms of her quality of life, it was traumatic and not very good at all.
05:58The relationship deteriorated with his alcoholism debt.
06:04He was terrible with money.
06:05But everybody thought he was a fun-loving person, happy-go-lucky.
06:08But Carol thought he was becoming evil and got them into debt and he was unfaithful with other women.
06:21But Richard Ray was not the only man in Carol's life or in her bed.
06:28Throughout the early years of her relationship with Richard Ray, even through the period where she gave birth twice to
06:41the couple's children,
06:43John Stoker continued sexually to abuse his daughter.
06:51Now, when someone is abused at such a young age and so extensively, it creates often very problematic behaviours, both
07:01in childhood and in adult life as well.
07:03You are not able to deal with things in a typical way often.
07:08You don't have healthy coping mechanisms very often.
07:13In 1977, Carol became pregnant with her father's child.
07:20She was forced to have an abortion to hide what he had been inflicting on her.
07:28And her life began spiralling ever further into depression and out of control.
07:39I mean, that's a perfect storm, isn't it?
07:41Absolutely.
07:42I mean, something has to break, doesn't it?
07:44It's such a build-up of dealing with so much that something has to give.
07:48How did Carol Ray's break happen?
07:52The first incident that we can pinpoint is the abortion of the child that would have been her father's.
08:00And that's in 1977.
08:02So, in December 1977, she sets fire to the family home.
08:09She set fire to a lot of clothes in the house and caused a big fire.
08:15Nobody was injured and they all escaped, but they had to move from the house.
08:20So, what we often see with particularly females who have been abused by family members is they lack a sense
08:27of control in their lives.
08:30And sometimes they will resort to problem behaviours to try and get that attention, to get some control over things.
08:36And one of those things that people often do is things like fire setting.
08:42And fire setting, particularly in arson, are often seen as types of crimes that will attract a lot of attention.
08:49It's very destructive, obviously, but also there will be fire engines and people and the whole kind of commotion that
08:56goes with it.
08:57And that, to the person who's trying to get that psychological input from the event, can be quite powerful.
09:05Statistically, it's quite unusual for an arsonist to be female.
09:10And Carol was quite prolific in her fire setting.
09:14And this was usually as a reaction to particularly stressful periods in her life,
09:20or they occurred after an accumulation of particular stresses.
09:28So, we know from your timeline that December 1977...
09:34Yes.
09:34..that's the first time that she starts a fire in response to trauma.
09:39Yes. Was she trying to hurt people?
09:41Was she trying to hurt herself?
09:43It's certainly a trigger response pattern that we're seeing.
09:50Carol Ray was an arsonist because she was an abused child.
09:55And because she continued to be an abused adult.
10:17Richard and Carol marry.
10:19The children are taken into care.
10:22Richard then loses his job or becomes redundant.
10:26And that is causing him to drink heavily.
10:31So, whether Carol is then thinking that she's about to become the victim of two abusive men.
10:38Her father is still, you know, abusing her.
10:42She's got all that abuse in her background.
10:44And then Carol's sister confides in her that she has been abused by her father,
10:52which Carol had no idea of up until that point.
10:58Although Carol Ray tried to escape her dad and he tracked her down,
11:02and he continued that abuse so significantly that she needed to have an abortion
11:07because he had actually impregnated her.
11:10It's not unusual that that abuse would then trauma bond someone like Ray to her dad.
11:19When Ray actually finds out that her sister is being abused also at the hands of her father,
11:25she isn't able to cope with this.
11:28She becomes almost jealous of that.
11:31Carol loved her father because she said, she actually said, for all he did, I loved him.
11:36And I think she wanted him to herself, not to her sister and everybody else.
11:44While to people who haven't suffered that level of abuse, that would seem absolutely outrageous.
11:51It's this trauma bonding.
11:53And that happens when someone has been abused at such a young age and so significantly as well.
12:00That's where we see the fire starting as a response to being unable to cope with stress in a normal,
12:07healthy way.
12:11In November 1980, Carol sets her second house fire and this time there are eight people including herself in the
12:20house.
12:22She set fire to the close in the airing cupboard and caused a major fire from which she went upstairs
12:32allegedly to warn her parents.
12:35The three brothers jumped out of the bedroom window and got seriously injured with broken bones.
12:41She jumped out as well and broke her arm.
12:44The firemen who attended the scene said it was like a battlefield with them all laying round with injuries.
12:50The house became totally gutted but everything else was saved.
12:56It was eventually, though it was held to be a bit suspicious, put down to an electrical fault.
13:03In terms of forensic fire investigation, then there are three elements really.
13:12The cause of the fire, how it developed and then potentially who was responsible.
13:19So when you're dealing with a case from the 1970s when the fuel to start a fire was effectively our
13:30home furnishings,
13:32which could be ignited through very simple means of just holding a match,
13:37then it meant that the cause of fire was very often established to be the things that were available in
13:47the home.
13:47And the intent to start that fire suddenly becomes a very difficult prospect to investigate
13:55because we know that people who smoked in their homes would potentially cause these fires inadvertently or just totally by
14:05accident.
14:05So, of course, when that fire is started intentionally, it makes the investigation of intent very difficult indeed.
14:18It seems to have been the answer to all the problems is if I want a new house, I'll burn
14:23the monarch down I'm in.
14:24If I'm in debt, I'll set fires and I'll get some money.
14:28Or if Richard wasn't behaving himself, that she could force him due to the fire to conform, to stop drinking.
14:38I think what could be interesting in this particular case is that Carol is hospitalised for four weeks.
14:46So when you're in hospital, it's a lot more difficult for people to abuse you.
14:51You're being cared, you're warm, you're in a safe environment, people are actively taking care of you.
14:58In her mind, this isn't just releasing the safety valve that she needs when the pressure builds up too much.
15:05It actually rewards her.
15:07Yes.
15:08So after this oasis of calm, she's thrown back in the maelstrom of her family life.
15:14Yes.
15:15Or is this another reward that her children are returned to her?
15:19So that might be a double reinforcement in terms of the behaviours that you're then going to see going forward.
15:26But the underlying problem is still there.
15:28Yes.
15:29So November 1980 was a fire that caused her to be hospitalised and you've got a five-year build.
15:35So that's a long time.
15:36On the 24th of September, Carol sets light to her family home and this time it has fatal consequences.
15:48Again, she became unhappy with where she was.
15:52Richard was drinking again heavily.
15:54In fact, he was regularly falling asleep downstairs drinking.
16:00Though he got well with the neighbours and they thought he was a nice person.
16:05He would spend long periods of time unemployed.
16:08He had an issue with alcohol and would often drink away what little money they did have as a family.
16:15And she also tried to support three children within that environment as well.
16:20Her youngest child was a daughter who suffered quite significantly due to disabilities which she was born with.
16:28That was again an additional stressor for Ray within that family environment.
16:36The night of Tuesday, September the 24th 1985 was pretty much like any other night in that family's life.
16:46Richard got drunk on cider and passed out on the sofa.
16:52Carol put the children to bed.
16:56She'd come to a stage where Richard's drinking that she couldn't live with it anymore in her mind.
17:04So he'd been out to a pub, had a few drinks and on the way back he'd met a neighbour.
17:11And they were both out actually walking the dogs.
17:15And the neighbour said he was in a good mood, there was nothing to it.
17:19But he went back home and then he continued drinking bottles of cider until he fell asleep.
17:25Which had sort of become a practice.
17:30On those occasions Carol couldn't manage to wake him up again.
17:34So on this night, she'd had enough.
17:39They were in debt.
17:41And she was fed up of him drinking.
17:45Her anger and her pain was bubbling up.
17:50And while her husband snored, she struck a match and carefully placed it on the arm of a chair.
18:06Very quickly, the living room went up in flames.
18:12The television exploded.
18:16The windows blew out.
18:19Carol's screams woke up her children.
18:22Mary, who was then 14, grabbed her brother, Sean, then aged 12, and dragged him to safety out the front
18:33door.
18:35Amanda, 11 years old, was so severely disabled that she wasn't able to escape.
18:48Amanda was left in the house.
18:51Carol made no attempt to go back in and get Amanda or to help her husband out of the fire.
18:59There was an eyewitness account and it said that Ray was just stood in the living room, motionless, looking out
19:07into the world.
19:09And it was only after a period of time that she then tried to escape.
19:18Carol was standing inside the house as the flames were building up and yet she did nothing.
19:27What does that indicate to you?
19:30There are several scores of thought here, isn't there, or several lines of thought that you could go down.
19:34Was she waiting to be rescued?
19:37Was she waiting to die?
19:40Was she hoping that the fire wouldn't spread as much as it did?
19:44I think it's difficult to tell her mindset.
19:48Was she finally ready to go with the rest of the family and didn't want to be separated from them?
19:55There's a couple of things which can be read from that potentially.
19:57That is someone who doesn't really have much consideration for any life around her.
20:03Someone who is completely resigned to the fact that she's going to die and she has set this house on
20:10fire.
20:11And it almost in kind of a suicidal ideation.
20:16But then there's also the other side to that, where she doesn't relate setting the fire to causing harm, particularly
20:24to her children.
20:26And the neighbours describe her as just walking about impassive.
20:33Outside as if in a trance, and not really bothered about what was happening, until she noticed people watching at
20:40her when she would start screaming, saying,
20:42My children are in the house.
20:44The fire brigade came and found Richard dead, having died through inhalation of smoke.
20:53And Amanda was in the bedroom. She had 35% degree burns.
20:59And they resuscitated at the scene. And she was taken into hospital.
21:07Twelve days after Carol Ray set that fire, her daughter Amanda died.
21:31Carol Ray causing a fire, which has ultimately led to the death of her own child, is incredibly shocking and
21:38incredibly sad.
21:40A parent's main job in their life is to look after their child, is to make them feel safe.
21:47And there's often more emphasis placed on this when it's a mother and a child.
21:51Because of that historic maternal role.
21:56In terms of forensic fire investigation, then it would have definitely been an observation-based investigation.
22:06So firefighters would have entered that property with the primary purpose of extinguishing any fire.
22:15And then beyond that would have then tried to establish the cause of that fire.
22:20Now, if the cause of that fire was a piece of furniture that had been ignited in the property, then
22:27it's very difficult to suddenly start to pick that apart from an accident versus something that was intentional and effectively
22:37started in order to commit murder.
22:41She convinced everybody that he'd caused the fire by accidentally dropping a cigarette while drunk.
22:48At the inquest, she persisted with that story to the extent that the jury believed her and recorded an accidental
22:56verdict for the deaths.
22:59The coroner commended her for her actions in getting the other two children out, which in fact she hadn't.
23:08What is interesting is that Carol then receives a commendation from the coroner.
23:15So although her husband and her disabled daughter have been killed because of the fire she started, Carol is essentially
23:24treated as a hero.
23:26Yes.
23:28So, we're going back to that positive reinforcement.
23:31Yep.
23:32She's come out and been rewarded for starting a fire.
23:37In terms of that positive reinforcement of behaviours, that's now the second time that you've started a fire and you've
23:45got something positive from it,
23:47despite the fact that her husband and her child have died.
23:54It's very likely that Ray got a release from starting the fires.
24:00She had no outlet for her anger, for her frustration, for her trauma.
24:06So often setting a fire would be akin to a release for her.
24:10However, when she was then praised for rescuing members of her family from one of the fires,
24:17that potentially would have given her a bit of a thrill because she was suddenly seen as someone who was
24:22important,
24:23who was useful, someone who had a purpose in life and someone who was needed as well.
24:29She obviously was of the belief that nobody would catch her.
24:33Having gone through the coroners and got an accidental death verdict, she thought she'd got away with it.
24:38In fact, committed the perfect murder.
24:45And for the next five years, because it is, from what your chart shows, it is another five years between
24:52that fatal fire and the next one.
24:55Yes.
24:56Carol Ray essentially gets away with murder.
24:58Yes, she does.
24:59I mean, that is as close to a perfect murder, if you like, as you can imagine, isn't it?
25:07Yes, yeah.
25:08And is rewarded for her efforts.
25:11Yeah, absolutely.
25:13But all of the underlying familial problems, apart from her husband...
25:20Yes.
25:21..and disabled daughter...
25:23Yes.
25:23..still exist.
25:24They do.
25:29Ray got away with the murders of her family members for many years.
25:34This may have been something which she felt haunted her
25:39because their deaths were never premeditated or it was never intentional to kill them.
25:44But she also was able to quite convincingly lie about the cause of the fires initially.
25:51So it might have been something that haunted her.
25:54But actually, she also may have just tried to forget that this had happened and move on.
26:00Particularly if it wasn't intentional and this fire starting came from a need for a release of trauma and stress.
26:12By 1990, she, Mary and Sean were living in a new council house in Gargrave Close, Rastrick,
26:23just six miles from the scene of the fire which had killed her husband and daughter.
26:29She was living with another woman, a woman whom she'd taken in as a lodger who had a young daughter.
26:38They had started a relationship. We could never get to the bottom of exactly what the relationship was.
26:45Unfortunately, that lodger, Dawn Holdroyd, had a boyfriend.
26:49And on the night of Wednesday, January the 24th, 1990, Dawn went out on a date with her boyfriend,
26:56leaving her infant daughter in Carol Ray's care.
27:01And Carol thought, if I start a small fire, she'll come back home straight away.
27:06So she set fire to the curtains in the dining room.
27:12The fire got out of control, but she got the children out of the house that was there and the
27:18fire brigade came.
27:20In the aftermath of the fire, Ray explained that it was an accident, that it had potentially been caused by
27:27an electrical fault.
27:28And that was something which, in hindsight, was seen as quite unusual because she had obviously started the fire,
27:37but then was very calm and very calculated in the way that she described it as being an accident.
27:44That fire, fortunately, no one died in.
27:48No fatal consequences to that fire, no.
27:50But it did have consequences.
27:53Yes.
27:54By this point, the association between Carol Ray and house fires is starting to become evident.
28:03One of the firemen who was there thought it suspicious that he'd been to her house on three occasions where
28:11there was a fire,
28:12and Carol Ray was always present.
28:14And he mentioned it to one of the uniformed police officers who was there, who reported the conversation to a
28:23detective constable, Philip Jagger, who came to me with it and said,
28:31give, outline the circumstances and what the fire brigade believed was a deliberate fire in the house.
28:38I then asked Philip to do a full antecedent history on her, on Carol Ray.
28:48The Halifax area was broken up into three areas and she had moved between all three and the fires had
28:55been committed in those three areas.
28:58And, of course, there were different fire stations that dealt with them.
29:01In effect, each time there was a fire, it was as if it was the first time that she had
29:07done it.
29:08Because we didn't have the technology available to digitally link these situations together quickly, then it would provide that kind
29:20of distance and time
29:24that prevented the situations being linked immediately.
29:29But, of course, once you start to put police work on top of that and forensic fire investigation and start
29:37to identify patterns in the way that the fires took place,
29:43and the circumstances around those fires took place, then it starts to close that net, really, around Carol Ray.
29:53We created a timeline of her offending. We spoke to as many of the people who lived near her at
30:01the time, especially the one where her husband died.
30:04And they had all said that they had raised concerns about that fire at the time, but nobody could prove
30:12anything.
30:13Some of them gave evidence at the coroner's call, but her previous fires were never known about or became evidence
30:22in that inquest.
30:25A large part of investigation now is looking at patterns and themes of crime.
30:33So the data analysis around investigation is so much more sophisticated, potentially, than it would have been in the 1970s.
30:42We have databases available. We have linked computer systems that allow us to predict and identify patterns in crime.
30:54And so, in this case, these fires are persistently happening on her watch.
31:00And, of course, now that would be flagged immediately as a pattern that would almost certainly require investigation.
31:13At this point, the police arrested Carol Ray for the murder of her husband, Richard, and of her daughter, Amanda,
31:22and for setting three other fires with intent to endanger life.
31:32They interviewed her, but she didn't confess when she first came in.
31:38Unusually, but with Carol Ray, they had to interview her the opposite way round.
31:42They had to start with her last offence, because we had clear evidence then that it wasn't an accident.
31:50So it was then talking to her about that, then introduce the other offences.
31:55And the more they talked about the one with her husband dying and the previous offences of arson at the
32:04parents' house when everybody got injured,
32:06she suddenly realised that she wasn't going to get away with it.
32:10So then she used the defence.
32:12It was all because her father had been committing incest with her and was still committing incest with her up
32:20to two years before she was arrested.
32:25She has a story to tell, doesn't she, which she says explains why she starts fires.
32:33Carol reveals the background of abuse that her and her sister have been subjected to.
32:38And as a result of that, John Stoker is arrested and he's charged with sexual assault.
32:46We actually did arrest the father and he served ten years for incest.
32:54It's difficult to know whether Ray meant to intentionally kill her family members,
32:59but she also continued to start fires at particular stressed points within her life.
33:05When she was finally arrested, she seemed almost pleased and relieved to be able to confess to the murders.
33:13So it suggests that it may have been playing on her mind for some time.
33:17But that's not to say that she felt gleeful that she had got away with murder.
33:23If she hadn't meant to cause such significant harm,
33:27she may have felt that this was almost now a cathartic release being able to confess.
33:34During the interview, she then started to talk about herself actually in the third person.
33:39There was no real sign of a mental illness, any kind of delusional behaviour that would have explained that.
33:46And it's almost like she couldn't accept that she'd done it, but she was willing to talk about the crime
33:53and explain what had happened, but using a third person.
33:56We sometimes find these situations where people will talk about, you know,
34:00I was there when the person died, but I wasn't responsible for the murder, but there was nobody else there
34:05either.
34:05And it's the kind of way of protecting themselves and protecting their own integrity,
34:10because they're not quite able to come to terms with what they've done.
34:15It's difficult to comprehend how you could have looked at all of this, fire after fire after fire,
34:24two deaths, severe injuries.
34:28Yes.
34:29And then heard someone say,
34:31yeah, I did start the fires, but I didn't mean to.
34:35Yes.
34:36I mean, that's going to engender a fairly sceptical response, isn't it?
34:40Yes, it absolutely would.
34:42And the minute you make the connection between the September 85 and then November 1980 fires,
34:51it automatically would have sent us back in time to look.
34:53And then if you see a 1977 fire where Carol is, you then start to see the pattern of behaviour.
34:59She'd accepted what she'd done in her mind and she felt justified.
35:05But now she was just looking for excuses why she did it,
35:09to try and mitigate the full effect of what it was and her criminality.
35:16But there's no doubt when things didn't go her way,
35:21she saw her answer to it was to start fire.
35:25That's what she did in every time when there was a crisis in her life.
35:29We didn't be so, you know what she did in every time.
35:43Carol Ray essentially got away with murder for years.
35:47If her intention wasn't to kill certainly her daughter,
35:52then that is something which may have played on her mind for that entire time.
35:59She is someone who was very calm,
36:03explaining that the fire was an accident initially,
36:06but then when she was later arrested,
36:08she seemed almost relieved to admit what she had done,
36:12so it's very likely that it might have played on her mind,
36:15particularly if it wasn't an intentional death
36:19for her daughter, at least.
36:26So, looking at the family, the family association chart you drew up,
36:31at this point, in 1990,
36:34her father is on remand for sexual abuse,
36:37her sister is recovering or dealing with trauma from sexual abuse,
36:42so is Carol, her husband is dead, her disabled daughter is dead.
36:47I mean, this is metaphorically a fire that's consuming
36:50this entire family, isn't it?
36:53Yes, yes.
36:54And all based in childhood trauma.
36:59On the surface, it might be very easy to say
37:01that Ray had psychopathic behaviours.
37:04However, we need to remember the significant trauma
37:07that she had experienced throughout her life
37:10and the way that trauma manifests itself as people mature.
37:15This is not to excuse what she has done,
37:18but to explain why she has taken the quite unusual action
37:23of starting fires.
37:26She was incredibly let down by the first man
37:31who is supposed to protect her,
37:33and yet he was someone who essentially hunted her down
37:37when she fled and tried to escape him,
37:40and he continued to abuse her, even into adulthood.
37:42So these are things that most people, thankfully,
37:46would never have to deal with and would never have to manage.
37:52She is charged with murder.
37:54She is.
37:55And endangering life.
37:56Yes.
37:57And she offers a plea, doesn't she?
38:02She says, I won't plead guilty to murder,
38:04but I will plead guilty to manslaughter.
38:08And the police and the prosecutors won't accept that.
38:11No.
38:11They say, no, you're going to trial.
38:13So by this time, the case would have been built.
38:16The investigation would have understood the pattern that had formed,
38:19and that actually Carol is the common denominator in all four fires.
38:25And manslaughter is a plea that is put forward for when somebody dies
38:31and is in accidental circumstances.
38:35There was no great premeditation.
38:36There was no great premeditation.
38:38You look at four fires, and you have to ask,
38:44were they planned?
38:45Not necessarily they were a response to trigger,
38:48but you carried on doing it.
38:49And that third fire killed your husband and your daughter,
38:54so you knew what the potential consequences were.
38:58Really, she knew at the second fire
38:59how hurt people could become in house blazes,
39:03and she chooses to carry on that behaviour.
39:08Carol Ray, pleading guilty to manslaughter,
39:11would save the substantial cost of a full trial
39:16and would spare witnesses from the trauma
39:20of having to relive what they had seen.
39:24But the police and prosecutors, to their credit,
39:28refused to do that.
39:30They said, no, Carol Ray, you deliberately set those fires.
39:36You did so knowing that people were in the house
39:40and you were reckless at best as to whether they would survive.
39:47And so, in December 1990, Carol Ray went on trial for murder.
39:55Two counts of murder, three counts of arson.
40:00She pleaded originally guilty to manslaughter,
40:05saying that she had set the fires but didn't intend to injure anybody.
40:10This wasn't acceptable to the prosecution or the police,
40:14and we persisted with the trial for murder.
40:19After the judge sent the jury out, after his summing up,
40:22they deliberated for three hours.
40:25They came back with guilty verdicts on the murders.
40:29They didn't accept the manslaughter,
40:33and the judge said that it was the only outcome.
40:37He thought she was a danger to the public,
40:39and I always would be,
40:41with the persistence of fires when she had a personal problem,
40:45and gave her five life sentences.
40:49And he told her she was and would remain a danger to the public.
40:58When Carol was sentenced, she showed no sign of remorse.
41:02She was impassive to the sentence,
41:05as if she knew what she'd done,
41:07and she was accepting what was coming.
41:10By the time Carol Ray emerges, if she ever does,
41:15she will be a pensioner.
41:19It's very difficult to know
41:21what Ray's prospects for rehabilitation would be,
41:25because it would require significant therapy
41:30and significant work around the trauma
41:33that she has been exposed to throughout her life.
41:37She would have to do some significant work
41:39around unpicking all of that
41:42and dealing with those issues
41:43to get past all of that trauma,
41:46not least the trauma
41:47that would probably have come from the fact
41:49that she'd also killed her own child.
41:52Is there a lesson you draw from this?
41:56Because there is for me.
41:57It is really looking at trauma
42:02and the fatal effects that that can have on somebody
42:06and trying to get interventions and support in
42:10as early as you possibly can
42:12to stop those behaviours developing.
42:14If you don't interrupt the cycle,
42:18if you don't investigate early,
42:21then you're going to be fishing bodies out of houses later on.
42:25I think for here you're talking about
42:27where should the intervention points have been
42:29and where should that support
42:32and social support have come from
42:34to make sure that that social support
42:36isn't disruptive or destructive.
42:39So taking Carol's children away
42:42might not necessarily have been the right course of action
42:46and may have just added to that.
42:48And also looking at abuse
42:50and the effect that has that early trauma
42:53is something that needs a lot more care and attention around it.
43:00I remember this, Chris,
43:04because it's unusual that you find somebody
43:07who persistently sets fires
43:10with a view of changing her life.
43:14Normally people do it because they enjoy watching fires
43:17or they have a fascination for them.
43:20But hers was for a specific purpose.
43:23She was in debt.
43:24She didn't like her house.
43:26The council would rehouse her.
43:28She didn't like her husband.
43:29She can kill him.
43:31She didn't like a girlfriend
43:32who she was living with,
43:34going out with another man.
43:36I'll set a fire and she'll come home and stay with me.
43:39It was all to do with what she wanted.
43:43How she felt emotionally.
43:45And she put everything down to her father.
43:51It's a case which could have been avoided.
43:55Carol Ray engaged with some very, very unhealthy coping mechanisms
44:00to deal with the trauma that she had experienced throughout her life.
44:04Had she have had more support,
44:08had she have had someone who cared for her,
44:12someone who didn't abuse her in the way that her own father did,
44:16then she might never have reached a point in her life
44:18where she set fires and ultimately fires which were lethal.
44:22So I think what sticks in my mind is,
44:25although this is utterly horrific,
44:26there were several victims left behind
44:30in terms of Carol Ray's behaviour.
44:32It's also quite a tragic case
44:34because of the level of trauma and abuse that Carol Ray suffered.
44:39She went on then to cause significant harm to her own family members.
44:47Ultimately,
44:48Carol Ray almost got away.
44:52She did for five years.
44:54What stopped her getting away with it?
44:58Her next offence.
45:00Compulsion?
45:01Undoubtedly.
45:02What really struck me when I looked at this
45:05incredible timeline you drew up with all the key events
45:09was that
45:12right from there,
45:14right from that first moment
45:17where John Stoker went into
45:20his 11-year-old daughter's bedroom
45:22and raped her.
45:24Yes.
45:26That end point
45:29was always going to be the outcome.
45:31Yes.
45:31Or something very similar.
45:33Yeah.
45:33And the culpability.
45:35And it's only when you see it laid out like that
45:38that it becomes crystal clear.
45:41Yes.
45:42During the investigation,
45:45it became clear
45:46that in 1985
45:48she had committed
45:50the perfect murder.
45:52She had got away with it.
45:53She showed no remorse.
45:55And it took her five years
45:57for her criminality
46:00and her actions
46:01to come to light properly
46:02and for her to be sentenced
46:04for the crime
46:06that she did commit
46:06five years earlier.
46:10For the crime
46:10in
46:10in
46:11in
Comments

Recommended