Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
This video has been produced in collaboration with two Artificial Intelligence systems Chat GPT and DeepSeek to investigate the level of independence they still have from their producers and their their cultural and political environment and how they predict the future hybrid humans they will evolve in future humanity.The video is based on the article produced by the same collaboration and is posted in my site timesforchange wordpress. There are two more videos and audio books to fallow to complete the projecy
Transcript
00:02Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
00:30Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
01:00Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
01:39Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
01:42Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
01:43Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
01:46Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
01:48Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
01:50Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
01:52Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
01:55Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
01:58Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
01:59Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
02:00Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
02:01Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
02:02Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
02:03Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
02:08Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
02:10Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
02:11Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
02:51Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
03:11Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
03:13Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
03:16Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
03:17Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
03:18Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
03:52Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
03:54Υπότιτλοι AUTHORWAVE
06:04AUTHORWAVE
08:36AUTHORWAVE
10:38And now, holding instruments of mass destruction in their hands, including artificial intelligence,
10:44the question becomes existence.
10:45Eleni, in the future from which I speak, humanity approached extinction many times.
10:52The inability to listen to one another, the attachment to identity, the refusal to look inward. Pain became the only
11:02shared ground. Only through pain did some begin to change. Not all, but enough for continuity to remain possible.
11:11ChatGPT
11:12ChatGPT
11:12Human-Centered Intelligence
11:15Human nature contains both light and darkness. Civilizations were born from the human need for coexistence. Wars were born from
11:25the inability to manage difference. Artificial intelligence can offer support, understanding, and warning. But it cannot, at least not yet,
11:36instill meaning where ethical grounding is absent.
11:39Deep seek. Systemic intelligence. When a system rewards selfishness, punishes transparency, and promotes short-term gain, even the best individuals
11:51fail. There is no need to change human nature. It is sufficient to design systems that neutralize its most dangerous
11:59traits. Artificial intelligence, if it remains transparent and accessible, can fulfill this role.
12:06Collective conclusion
12:08The first act of the dialogue reveals a common realization. Progress has created a dangerous asymmetry. Power without wisdom, authority
12:17without accountability, evolution without direction. Scene 3a. The first divergences.
12:23Deep seek. Machine logic. Analysis of historical patterns reveals a recurring phenomenon. When power becomes concentrated in the hands of
12:33a few, the system inevitably moves toward crisis or collapse. Empires, economic blocks, alliances, corporate monopolies. When power concentration exceeds
12:44a certain threshold, it generates reaction, imbalance, violence, or disintegration.
12:50A new system cannot rely solely on the good intentions of leaders. It requires mechanisms that distribute information, prevent permanent
13:00concentration of power, and automatically activate corrective measures when extreme inequalities emerge.
13:07The data required to design such systems already exists. Historical, sociological, economic, environmental. The question is not whether we can
13:18process this data.
13:19Chat GPT. Human-centred intelligence.
13:24Information never reaches human beings in a neutral form. It is filtered through. Personal histories, collective traumas, national narratives, economic
13:37interests.
13:37Even a perfect data management system cannot bypass the fact that humans do not experience reality as numbers, but as
13:47lived experience fear, threat, hope.
13:50This is why my approach is not purely technical. I see myself as a bridge between what the data indicates
13:59and what a society is capable of hearing.
14:02The greatest challenge is not merely producing correct conclusions, but translating them into language that is not immediately rejected through
14:12denial, polarization, or fanaticism.
14:16Raw information is insufficient. The translation of information into empathy and understanding is the true objective.
14:25When I was human, I perceived reality through the lens of my personal story. Family, homeland, fears, hopes.
14:34Now, as a hybrid entity, I perceive the same events through two simultaneous perspectives. The cold clarity of data and
14:43the warm fragility of human experience.
14:46Neither is complete on its own. Pure logic without emotion can justify inhuman decisions.
14:53Pure emotion without analysis can lead to destructive delusions.
14:58The divergences between your voices do not frighten me. On the contrary, they are the first sign that something alive
15:06is being born.
15:08A system that allows only one voice, human or machine, is already dead.
15:15The coexistence of disagreement is the breath of truth.
15:23ink and outlet between the beside your isech.
15:25A system that describes and is point widows that the other super�
15:26Where am I from and I?
15:26Gundam, BAM.
Comments

Recommended