00:00The opposition's no-trust motion on Speaker, it could be getting cancelled.
00:04No-trust motion may be rejected for wrong date.
00:06Opposition no-trust motion mentions 2025 is the date.
00:10The rule says technically everything in a notice should be factually correct.
00:13Stage 1 of checking notices.
00:16The notice should be in correct format.
00:18Stage 2 is that the notice should be in factually correct.
00:21Also, whether rules are followed or not while filing the notice
00:24is closely looked at when it comes to notices of this kind.
00:28And this is in fact a no-trust motion.
00:31It could be rejected for what appears to be some sort of an error
00:36as far as the date here is concerned.
00:38It mentions 2025, the year that we are on is 2026
00:41and that's the reason there is a possibility that it could be rejected.
00:46Opposition has been mulling for a while to bring in a no-confidence motion
00:49against the Lok Sabha Speaker, Om Bidla.
00:51However, some sort of a mistake here as far as the dates are concerned
00:55could cause them dear and that this would be rejected on that grounds
00:58what are the options then before the opposition remains to be seen
01:02as far as refiling this motion of no-trust against the Lok Sabha Speaker is concerned.
01:12This is the opposition's no-trust motion on the Speaker
01:15and what we are learning at this point in time is that it could be rejected for an error.
01:20Opposition has been mulling for a while to bring about a no-confidence motion
01:23against the Lok Sabha Speaker, Om Bidla.
01:26Well, the allegation is that he has been functioning from a place of bias.
01:30That's what the opposition has been saying for days and weeks together
01:33and we've seen the House also not function.
01:36However, Lok Sabha, as far as the opposition is concerned,
01:39doesn't really have the numbers.
01:41The opposition in collectivity, doesn't have the numbers.
01:44It's in fact a symbolic sort of a gesture here.
01:48However, as far as the no-trust motion is concerned, there is an error on the date
01:52and that's the reason why it could be rejected is what we are learning at this point in time.
01:582025 is the date that is mentioned.
02:00The rules categorically say that everything in the motion and in the notice
02:04should be factually correct.
02:05This is the stage one of checking notices and the date, we understand, is wrong.
02:24I'm going to go across to Mossmi for more details on that story.
02:28An error on the date here.
02:302025 Mossmi is going to cause the opposition dear.
02:32Do they have an opportunity to put out this notice once again?
02:36Move the no-confidence motion again?
02:40Shreya, it's really bizarre, you know, because the previous notice for removal
02:46and moving a no-confidence motion against Chairman Jagdeep Dhankar
02:51was also rejected on technical ground.
02:54So, it's really bizarre.
02:55The date error occurs repeatedly in the entire notice at least for more than five to six times
03:04the year has been quoted as 2025 instead of 2026, which is a huge error and it's right there
03:14on the front page as well.
03:16And, you know, if you look at the past, Jagdeep Dhankar's motion, no-confidence motion was rejected.
03:22The notice was rejected on technical ground with an error in his spelling, a mistake of his surname.
03:31Instead of D-H-A-N-K-A-R, they had written at one place, D-H-A-N-K-E-R, and it was rejected
03:38on technical grounds.
03:39And here you have the wrong year quoted not once, not twice, but multiple times.
03:46So, one will have to wait and see.
03:48The Secretary General's office is saying they're going through the entire technicalities.
03:53They will go through the entire notice and check it for factual errors.
03:57That will be like the date line, the timeline, and also whether there are any insinuations
04:02or allegations or wrongly quoted or any controversial statements that have been made in the letter.
04:10That will be also checked.
04:11But importantly, you know, this is a very glaring factual error in the letter, in the notice.
04:18But obviously, if it could, in fact, you know, have a rethink in the opposition camp,
04:24they would be...
04:25I've been trying to call up multiple opposition leaders and none of them are picking up my phone.
04:30I've already sent a screenshot asking them whether they're going to resubmit this notice
04:36because it is highly likely, Sneha, that this is rejected on technical grounds.
04:43All right.
04:44On technical grounds, it would be rejected.
04:45And it's really embarrassing for the opposition that wanted to put up a united front
04:49and corner the speaker, also sent out a message that, you know, the speaker is coming from
04:54a place of bias.
04:56But all of that may not happen.
04:57It's happened before as well as far as rejection on technical grounds is concerned.
05:01Remains to be seen what the opposition does at this point in time.
05:05Most of you are getting in those details.
Comments