Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 week ago
The Federal Court has reinstated the words “offensive” and “annoy” in Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, ruling that the words are not unconstitutional.

Read more at https://tinyurl.com/u7xauasf

WATCH MORE: https://thestartv.com/c/news
SUBSCRIBE: https://cutt.ly/TheStar
LIKE: https://fb.com/TheStarOnline

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00the federal court on Friday reinstated the words offensive and annoy in section 233 subsection 1a
00:14of the communications and multimedia act a five judge panel in the court ruled that the two words
00:21did not infringe article 10 section 1a of the federal constitution they said the purpose of
00:28the section in the act was to regulate the improper use of network facilities and services with a view
00:35to providing a safe online environment they said it serves to protect individuals and communities
00:42from suffering harm as a result of such improper use and it targets communications that fall outside
00:49the purview of the freedom of speech and expression they delivered the decision in an appeal filed by
00:57the government against the court of appeals decision that struck down a part of section 233 subsection 1a
01:05that consisted of the words offensive and annoy relating to a lawsuit brought by activist heidi
01:11kwa who challenged the constitutionality of the words after she was charged in court for her facebook
01:17posting in 2021 the federal court also held that the prosecution against kwa was baseless
01:25they said they are of the view that the prosecution should not have been brought against kwa because
01:31the content of her facebook post falls within the definition of the right to freedom of speech
01:37the constitution of the right to freedom of speech and expression under article 10 section 1a of the constitution
01:41the constitution
01:55the constitution
Comments

Recommended