Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 11 hours ago
A government backed audit has identified 67 defence sites which could be sold to generate around 1.8 billion dollars. The defence force is in the process of redirecting investment towards northern bases and infrastructure supporting the AUKUS program.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00So this is all about ensuring better bang, if you like, for the taxpayer buck.
00:06So at the moment, the Australian Defence Force and the Australian Government, for that matter,
00:11has a sprawling defence estate with properties across Australia.
00:15But many of them have fallen into disrepair and are actually really underutilised or not
00:23being used at all.
00:24So essentially what happened was the government created an independent audit that looked at
00:30what properties could be sold off.
00:32And it identified 68 potential properties of which the government has agreed to 67 of them.
00:40And in many ways, this is a response really to the Defence Strategic Review, which really
00:45looked at where Australia needs to improve its capabilities and really suggested that
00:51there'd be less of a focus on some of these southern bases and divert that attention to
00:57the north of Australia.
00:59So we've seen a lot of renovations, if you like, and updates at various bases, for example,
01:06at RAF Base Tyndall, at Catherine in the Northern Territory.
01:10Ultimately, this is all about ensuring that Australia's defences are where they need to
01:16be. And Defence Minister Richard Myles made that announcement here at Parliament House earlier
01:21today.
01:22It was thorough.
01:25It was exhaustive.
01:27But in so many ways, it was also damning.
01:31And I do want to take you to some of what the report says.
01:36On page 33, and I'm quoting, it says,
01:39Defence is constrained by the weight of its past when it comes to management of the estate.
01:44Today's estate footprint comprises numerous legacy sites without a clear ongoing link to
01:51current or future capabilities.
01:53Urgent interventions are needed to correct the unsustainable trajectory that has resulted
01:59from decades of deferred decisions on contentious estate issues.
02:04So, Olivia, is the government describing these only as potential sales, or these are definitely
02:10going to be sold?
02:12Look, they're definitely looking to sell them, but it's something that's really going to take
02:16some years to get underway.
02:18So we're not likely to see for sale signs being put up immediately.
02:22But they certainly do want to see this revenue reinvested into other parts.
02:28And there are some significant sites up for sale, really.
02:33And they could ruffle some feathers within the defence community.
02:36I'll run you through a couple now, including high-profile properties such as Victoria Barracks.
02:42That's in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, Spectacle Island in New South Wales, and also HMAS
02:49Penguin in New South Wales.
02:50Now, as you see on screen here, there is a statement from RSL Australia.
02:55And they say why, while they see the strategic logic in this decision, the Defence Strategic
03:02Review made clear we need to reorient to our northern approaches.
03:07But these aren't empty paddocks on a spreadsheet.
03:10They're places where Australians learn to soldier, where bonds of mateship were forged, and where
03:15generations prepared to defend the nation.
03:17So that's Peter Tinley there at AM.
03:21He says the government needs to tap the brakes here, take a breath, because once these sites
03:25are gone, they're gone forever.
03:27Ultimately, we could see the government generate around $3 billion in revenue originally from
03:34the sell-off of these identified properties.
03:36But that'll be whittled down to a much smaller amount, just $1.8 billion, once they take into
03:44consideration, say, remediation costs at these sites and also relocating staff.
03:50We did see a statement drop just in the past 10 minutes or so from the Shadow Defence Minister,
03:56Angus Taylor.
03:57And he's also called out this decision in a similar fashion to RSL Australia, essentially
04:04saying that he's not sure that this is the best idea.
04:08The Defence Minister, Richard Miles, this morning, anticipating some of this criticism, had this
04:13to say.
04:15I also want to make clear that the heritage value of these properties does not belong to
04:21the Australian Army or, for that matter, the Australian Defence Force.
04:25It belongs to the Australian people.
04:28And right now, the Australian people are prevented from seeing these properties.
04:34They exist behind a defence wall.
04:38So, Joe, as I say, these asset sales could take years and years to complete.
04:43So, we're not going to see this immediate sell-off overnight.
04:47Mr Miles, this morning, did say that we could see some of this land, if you like, freed up to
04:54essentially build housing for Australians, as we know we are in the midst of a housing crisis.
05:00But he says that's not the driving factor, if you like, behind the sale.
05:04He says this is all about ensuring that the ADF's capability is where it needs to be in a
05:09deteriorating geostrategic environment.
05:12And, Olivia, was there any talk today about the heritage value of these sites?
05:16Because there are some beautiful old sandstone buildings, for example, on the Sydney site.
05:21Was there any talk about buildings like those being protected?
05:25I'd say that there was an acknowledgement from the government that there are sort of
05:30important legacy issues to consider here.
05:34However, by that same token, there was nothing in the material, certainly, that we were pouring
05:39over during our morning briefing, essentially calling out sort of potential safeguards about
05:45that. So that's certainly a question that we'll be asking in the coming days about how you ensure
05:51that if these sites are sold off, as you say, they're beautiful sandstone buildings, how that
05:56heritage will be protected. But I guess what the minister was trying to say there in his comments
06:01before was that this legacy isn't just for defence, it's for Australians in general.
06:07So I guess by the tone of his language there, there is the suggestion that he would like to see
06:12those landmarks preserved in some fashion, although we don't know exactly how that will happen.
Comments

Recommended