Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 8 months ago
The Taiwan Foundation for Democracy has held a debate between human academics and AI opponents on the use of technology in government policymaking. The human team, which was arguing in favor of using AI to make policymaking decisions, was judged to have won. The robot side argued that AI needed strict regulations to avoid misuse. The event was moderated by cyber ambassador-at-large Audrey Tang.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00At this unique forum in Taipei, three human academics are debating three AI competitors about the use of the technology in democracies.
00:11The government-backed Taiwan Foundation for Democracy has invited a team of professors called the AI Terminators who argued in favor of AI.
00:20On the other side, a team of AI debaters modeled after some real-life philosophers running on Foxconn's Foxgrain AI language model Tai De, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude argued against its use.
00:45坦一人工智慧对民主治理力大于必合。我们先确定这场比的不是治理变快多少,而是民主在出错时能不能承担后果。
00:55请指教,谢谢。
01:00其实我刚刚想表达是说。
01:02我必须强调。
01:03好,请。
01:04Despite some technical difficulties, things ran mostly smoothly as speakers from each side cross-examine the other's argument.
01:11那您是否建议我们现在全世界都暂时停用AI,马上暂时停用AI,您认为可以吗?
01:20我不是建议全世界暂时停用AI,而是强调在引入AI道,民主政治时,必须仔细考量其对责任链与资讯可信度的影响。
01:38Human judges shared their thoughts on the approach, noting some of the challenges the AI debaters had in questioning their opponents' logic,
01:45and the limits on how deep their arguments went.
01:48In the end, the judges and audience decided that the humans won.
01:52But the outcome here might not have much effect.
01:55AI is already being used in governments today,
01:57and whether the risks are worth the added efficiency will likely be the subject of future debates.
02:03Chris Ma and Tiffany Wong in Taipei for Taiwan Plus.
02:08没有事实力认为神经理应该进行的 Flag心。
02:10没事实力认为神经理应该进行中的其他事件。
02:11没有事实力认为神经理应该进行的关系。
02:13没有问题实力认为神经理应该进行中的同感觉。
Comments

Recommended