Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 8 hours ago
Transcript
00:00You're definitely starting to see consolidation. So Strive was the first Bitcoin treasury company
00:04to announce a merger with the proposed acquisition of Semler Scientific. And Semler,
00:10for those that don't know, was the second U.S. company after strategy to become a Bitcoin
00:14treasury company. And so I would agree with your assessment, Katie, that there are too many digital
00:19asset treasury companies today with no differentiation. I think over time, you'll
00:24start to see more sophisticated strategies emerge. And I think you'll actually see a growth
00:29in digital asset and specifically Bitcoin treasury companies with specific differentiations. But I
00:36think this current version, I think, lacks sufficient differentiation. And that's why you're seeing a lot
00:41of them trade below the value of the Bitcoin themselves. Matt, last week we spoke with Jack
00:47Mallers. He's the 21 Capital CEO. And he spoke about how he thinks there are ways that investors should
00:54have more exposure to Bitcoin. Take a listen. My general opinion is I think these index
00:59investors should optimize to get Bitcoin exposure somehow. I think it's very important that the
01:03passive investor has access to the best performing asset in human history, the best performing asset
01:10over the last 15 years, and now one of the largest assets in the world at $1.8 trillion. That's the size
01:16of these big, you know, MAG-7 tech companies. So I think that passive investors should have access to it.
01:24And he's referring, of course, to index compilers like MSCI, which has brought up the possibility of
01:29perhaps not including companies that are not operating companies and just hold Bitcoin as kind
01:35of an investment. You've pushed back against that idea. State your case for why you think
01:40digital asset treasury companies should be included in the MSCI indexes.
01:45There's multiple reasons. But what I think is the most important reason is that it's not the job
01:50of an index provider like MSCI to pick and choose winners. And Bitcoin treasury companies,
01:56if run well, like Strive, I'm sure 21 will be the same, like strategy, are operating companies. We
02:02have products. We have services. We're a structured finance company. So as an example, SATA is structured
02:07finance. It's a product out into the market. As Katie knows, we've known in the old version of
02:14Strive, Strive is also an asset manager. We have 13 ETFs that trade on the New York Stock Fund.
02:19Funny enough, we use Bloomberg for our indexes and Bloomberg actually includes strategy in them.
02:25They have not excluded them. And it's been to the benefit of Bloomberg index holders. It's actually
02:30outperformed competitor 500 funds. And I think the first principle here is like Jack Bogle.
02:37You want to own the market. You don't want to exclude funds. And yes, I agree with Jack on
02:42maximizing Bitcoin exposure. But the role of a passive index funds is not to take a view.
02:46It's allow innovation to occur and let winners occur where winners are. And I think that
02:51MSCI is probably concerned with how much success strategies had and what that means for the
02:56percentage of holdings in their index. But I don't think that's a valid reason to exclude them.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended