Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago

Visit our website:
http://www.france24.com

Like us on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24.English

Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/France24_en
Transcript
00:00The era we're living in is the information crisis, an epoch where we're overwhelmed with facts and fakes
00:07that both fill our world with new, sometimes beautiful ideas, but also fear and anger.
00:12That's according to a new book which notes that it is not the world's first information crisis, but rather our third.
00:18Don't burn anyone at the stake today and other lessons from history about living through an information crisis
00:22is by Naomi Alderman, who joins us now to help us figure out potentially how to live through this current crisis.
00:29Naomi Alderman, thanks for your time and joining us on France 24.
00:32Firstly, can I ask you to talk us through your premise for this book?
00:35It's the world's third information crisis.
00:37So how does this one compare with, say, when writing was invented or indeed the printing press?
00:44Right, so we can look back through history and we can see that after the printing press was invented,
00:50indeed there were wonderful, beautiful things that happened in the world,
00:54and we're all very pleased, I think, probably that the Enlightenment happened.
00:57But at the same time, it's pretty well established by historians that the invention of the printing press
01:05was what caused the Reformation, which caused, in France and around Europe,
01:11the burnings at the stake of hundreds of people.
01:15Catholics burned Protestants, Protestants burned Catholics,
01:17people who had previously felt that those around them were sort of roughly in agreement
01:23on most of the things that seemed important to them.
01:27Suddenly, with this huge tidal wave of information, which came in the form of books,
01:33in the form of pamphlets, pamphlets being the sort of original social media,
01:38suddenly people became very overwhelmed by information.
01:42It made them very anxious, made them very angry.
01:45People tended then to form thinker-like groups where they just wanted to be around other people
01:52who had the same views as them.
01:54And we can see the traces of that same type of psychological process
01:59happening in the world around us right now.
02:01When I worked this out, so I just finished a Master's in Classics,
02:05where I was also looking at what happened after the invention of writing.
02:09So, obviously, it's harder to know what happened before writing
02:13because they couldn't write it down.
02:15But certainly, we know that, for example,
02:19the invention of particularly phonetic script,
02:21that is where every symbol makes a sound,
02:24causes societies, mostly, to become less respectful towards the elderly.
02:31Right, why does that happen?
02:32Because before you have writing,
02:35if you want to know what happened 60 years ago,
02:40you need to find a 70-year-old person.
02:42If you want to know where was the safe place to shelter
02:45the last time the river burst its banks,
02:48and maybe the river last burst its banks 40 years ago,
02:51you're going to have to find someone who's 50 or older to tell you what happened.
02:54Once you can write it down, that's much more secure.
02:57But it also leads to a devaluing of other human beings
03:01who previously were the repositories of knowledge for us.
03:05So, these are the patterns that we can see.
03:08We can see that when these technologies of information dispersal
03:12increase quite suddenly within a generation,
03:15you often get very profound social unrest.
03:19And having spotted this pattern, I thought,
03:22oh, I have to tell everybody.
03:23I have to sort of grab the world by the lapels and go,
03:27it's all right.
03:28Everyone around you hasn't gone bananas.
03:30We have been through this before.
03:32It is indeed very reassuring to think that humans
03:35have had similar reactions in the past,
03:37because indeed, especially after the printing press,
03:39what you're describing,
03:40seems very much to mirror what we're living through today
03:43and that dividing into groups.
03:45So, one wonders then,
03:46how did things calm down again at that time?
03:49And, you know, when might we start to do it and how?
03:51Right. So, when we think about what had to happen
03:56after the invention of the printing press
03:58in order to get to the Enlightenment,
04:00that new flowering of scientific knowledge and discovery,
04:04when we really think about it,
04:06what we realised had to happen
04:07was that we needed, well, three things.
04:11We had to have laws that prevented people
04:14from telling absolute lies using printed media.
04:17So, we had to have laws against libel,
04:20laws that said that if you were reading
04:23a particular thing,
04:24somebody had to have checked
04:25whether what was in it was true.
04:28We also had to have new technologies.
04:32So, I'm talking about things like
04:33the invention of the index and the contents page
04:36and the textbook.
04:38Somebody had to invent it.
04:40Petrus Aramud, who lived in Paris,
04:42was the person who came up with the idea
04:45that you would have a book which had essentially
04:47a textbook, is a book that is written
04:50by someone who's read 500, 1,000 books
04:53in the subject and then can lead you through it.
04:56So, we had to have ways of being guided
04:58through that information.
04:59And I think right now,
05:01as we can see from the constant scrolling,
05:05there isn't really a way to go,
05:07here is the critical information
05:09and now you can turn it off.
05:11And we also needed new social norms.
05:15So, we needed thoughts about,
05:17all right, what are the right ways
05:19to interact with text?
05:20How do I decide what to believe
05:22and what is untrue?
05:24This also works with the technologies,
05:28for example, of the invention
05:30of the system of scientific journals
05:32and peer review,
05:33where you go, all right, there are systems
05:35which mean that I know I can absolutely trust
05:38that if I'm reading this,
05:39it's definitely correct.
05:41And if I'm reading this thing
05:43that I picked up on a park bench,
05:44that might just be nonsense.
05:47And for now, on the internet,
05:50a lot of those systems don't really exist yet.
05:53They exist in print,
05:54which I think is helpful for us.
05:57I think people understand
05:58that if you're watching something on France 24,
06:00that has more likelihood of being correct
06:03than a random video on TikTok,
06:06which might have been created by Sora or whatever.
06:09So, I find it hopeful
06:10that those systems haven't completely broken down.
06:13And if we can find ways to make sure
06:16that those systems then exist
06:18within the wider internet,
06:20I think we will be in a better place.
06:22But we are going to have to call for that using laws
06:25and also enforce the laws
06:27that we already have much more strictly
06:29on the internet
06:30in order to get ourselves through this.
06:33Indeed, there just seems to be a need
06:35for that will to put laws in place
06:37at the same speed
06:38with which technology is developing.
06:40But speed is something
06:40that I feel could come against us.
06:43So, I feel a lot of people want
06:44to go so fast
06:45when it comes to information
06:46and even achieving skills
06:48or commenting,
06:49which a lot of your book talks about,
06:51on what they see online.
06:52I mean, is that where humans
06:54maybe need to take a breath
06:55in order to live better
06:56through this crisis?
06:58I mean, I certainly don't think
07:00that the only answer is,
07:02as people say,
07:03personal responsibility
07:04because I do think
07:05that we need better laws,
07:07better governments.
07:07I mean, I think the EU
07:08is in an amazing place
07:09to push back against
07:10the technology companies
07:12that are absolutely trying
07:14to addict people
07:15to false, bad information.
07:17But having said that,
07:19I think the idea
07:20of being able to say,
07:22OK, this information crisis
07:24is going to be going on
07:26for the rest of our lives,
07:28the rest of my life,
07:29the rest of your life,
07:30the rest of the viewers' lives.
07:32And therefore,
07:34one of the questions
07:35one can ask oneself is,
07:37how do I want to have lived
07:39during this period of history?
07:41Given, you know,
07:42probably our descendants
07:43are going to be able
07:44to have quite a lot of information
07:46about what we did.
07:48And those thoughts,
07:49which I put into the book,
07:50about saying to ourselves,
07:52all right,
07:53if I find something
07:54on the internet
07:55that seems incredibly calculated
07:58to push my own buttons,
08:01to make me feel angry
08:03in exactly the way
08:05that is going to really
08:06most enrage me,
08:07to upset me
08:08or to make me feel
08:10very, very frightened
08:11or even to make me delighted
08:12in the way that I love
08:13being delighted.
08:14If I come across
08:15something like that,
08:17maybe that is the moment
08:18to just take a pause.
08:19Instead of retweeting it
08:21or reposting it,
08:22to say,
08:23ah,
08:24this thing that is
08:25specially targeted
08:26towards me
08:27that has made me feel
08:29these strong emotions,
08:31I need to check
08:32whether that is true or not.
08:34This would be
08:35a very helpful social norm
08:36and a very helpful thing
08:37to teach children.
08:39I mean,
08:39this is another
08:40very important question
08:42because right now
08:44there are very few safeguards
08:45on the big fire hose
08:48of the internet.
08:48It is often quite hard
08:51to know how to give children
08:53safe access to the internet
08:54in a way that is going
08:55to enable them
08:56to learn how to behave.
08:58And I do think
08:59that it is probably
09:00quite a helpful plan
09:02for parents
09:03to show their children
09:05what they are doing
09:06when they are scrolling
09:07and making decisions
09:08about this is how I decide
09:10whether this is true or not.
09:12This is how I decide
09:14how to respond.
09:14Look,
09:15this is something
09:16that has made me angry
09:17and instead
09:19I'm putting it down.
09:22These are different questions
09:24to,
09:24oh,
09:24we don't have phones
09:25at mealtimes,
09:25which is also a great strategy,
09:27but also to be modelling
09:28how to behave online
09:30to children
09:31rather than just going
09:32keep them away
09:33from social media
09:34until they are 16
09:35or 18
09:36and then just let them loose.
09:38So instead of making that
09:39part of parenting conversations.
09:42Interesting
09:42and not burying
09:43our head in the sands
09:44when it comes to all this
09:45new technology,
09:45which I think a lot of us
09:46potentially might like.
09:47But one of the suggestions
09:48you give also
09:49is to ignore the opinions
09:51of others.
09:52I'm hearing that
09:52when you speak about it online,
09:54I can hear the logic.
09:55But how much do you think
09:56this is petering down
09:57to people's communications
09:59in everyday life?
10:00I mean,
10:00do we nearly risk?
10:01I feel like people
10:02have become so angry now,
10:03quick to anger,
10:04if you like,
10:05that do we run the risk
10:06of being able to hold
10:07healthy debate in society?
10:08I definitely think
10:11that the skill
10:13of sitting round a table
10:15and having a conversation
10:16is a vital skill
10:18for the next 50 years.
10:21Just to be able to go,
10:23we have different views,
10:25we're not going to agree,
10:27but I can respect the reasons
10:29that you hold those views.
10:30So to me,
10:31there is a really important
10:32distinction
10:33between disagreeing
10:35and treating people poorly.
10:37You do not have to treat
10:38somebody poorly
10:39just because you disagree
10:40with them.
10:41And if you think about
10:42what has happened
10:43since the print revolution,
10:46since the reformation,
10:47indeed,
10:48although people,
10:49a lot of people
10:50got burned at the stake,
10:51there are still Protestants
10:53and there are still Catholics.
10:55And therefore,
10:56we do have to just
10:57sort of work out
10:58how to be able
11:00to talk to one another
11:01in some healthy way.
11:02So when I say in the book,
11:05I'm increasingly,
11:07I am not very interested
11:09in opinions
11:10and much more interested
11:11in emotions,
11:12which is to say
11:14if somebody feels strongly
11:15about a particular opinion
11:18that they hold,
11:19I'm very interested to know
11:20what other life circumstances
11:22that have led them to that.
11:25I'm very interested to know
11:26why this strikes
11:27such a chord with them,
11:28what it's bringing up for them.
11:30These are all stories
11:30about who that person is
11:32that can enable me
11:33to understand the world better.
11:35If somebody is not an expert
11:36in a particular subject,
11:38I don't think I probably
11:39need to take their opinion
11:40very seriously.
11:41And the same applies to me,
11:43by the way.
11:44The reason that I can talk
11:46about this is because
11:46I've done my degrees in it,
11:49but a lot of what I think
11:51is about feelings.
11:53Naomi Alderman,
11:53unfortunately,
11:54we'll have to leave it there,
11:55but thank you so much
11:55for joining us here
11:56on France 24.
11:57Very much appreciated.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended