Skip to playerSkip to main content
Rep. Thomas Massie sharply questioned former Trump adviser Kash Patel over the FBI’s handling of the Epstein case files. Under oath, Patel acknowledged that the documents include references to a “high-profile government official,” raising new questions about why portions of the Epstein records remain hidden from the public. This video breaks down what happened, what Patel said, and why the exchange is drawing national attention.

#ThomasMassie #KashPatel #EpsteinFiles #FBI #CongressHearing #EpsteinCase #JeffreyEpstein #EpsteinList

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Director Patel, I watched some of your Senate hearing yesterday when Senator
00:04Kennedy asked you, you've seen most of the files, who if anyone did Epstein
00:09traffic these women to besides himself? You replied, according to the transcript,
00:14there is no credible information that he trafficked them to anyone else. You also
00:19said somewhere in the hearing and here today that the problem is that the case
00:23files are constrained by limited search warrants from 2006 to 2007 and that the
00:28non-prosecution agreement, hamstrung future investigations. Those constraints only
00:34apply to Southern District of Florida. They do not apply to Southern District of
00:38New York, the location of the 2019 sex trafficking indictment, which produced
00:42many things, including a series of FD 302 documents. According to victims who
00:48cooperated with the FBI in that investigation, these documents in FBI
00:53possession, your possession, detail at least 20 men, including Mr. Jess Staley, CEO of
01:00Barclays Bank, who Jeffrey Epstein trafficked victims to. Victims including
01:05minors, such as Virginia Roberts, you free. May she rest in peace. That list also
01:12includes at least 19 other individuals, one Hollywood producer worth a few
01:17hundred million dollars, one royal prince, one high profile individual in the music
01:22industry, one very prominent banker, one high profile government official, one
01:27high profile former politician, one owner of a car company in Italy, one rock star,
01:32one magician, at least six billionaires, including a billionaire from Canada. We
01:38know these people exist in the FBI files, the files that you control. I don't know
01:43exactly who they are, but the FBI does. Have you launched any investigations into any
01:49of these people? And have you seen these 302 documents? Sir, I have asked my FBI agents to
01:58review the entirety of the Epstein files and bring forth any credible information. And we're working
02:03with Congress not only to divulge that information and produce it to you, but any investigations that
02:08arise from any credible investigation will be brought. There have been no new materials brought to
02:13me launching a new indictment. So is the loophole here or is it your assertion that these victims
02:21aren't credible, that the 302s maybe didn't produce credible statements that rise to a probable cause?
02:29It's not my assertion, sir. It's the assertion of two different United States Attorney's offices from
02:35three separate administrations who investigated those same materials in lifetime. The 302 documents
02:41in the FBI's possession? They reviewed all that, yes, sir. And so have you reviewed those 302 documents
02:47that where the victims name the people who victimized them? If I personally know, but the FBI has.
02:56So how can you sit here and in front of the Senate and say there are no names? I named one today.
03:04I said, we are not in the, we are not in the practice at the Department of Justice and FBI of
03:10releasing victims names. That is not what we do. We are also not in the habit of releasing incredible
03:16information. That's not what we do. But multiple authorities have looked at the entirety of what we
03:22have. Okay. I got to move on here. Were you present?
Comments

Recommended