Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 5 weeks ago
In the case against publisher Associated Newspapers, his legal team argued that a report about his legal claim against the U.K. government caused “serious damage to his reputation and substantial hurt, embarrassment and distress."
Transcript
00:00A high court judge in London has ruled that part of an article in the Mail on Sunday
00:03about Prince Harry's legal claim against the British government's home office was defamatory.
00:09The Duke of Sussex had filed a claim against the newspaper's publisher,
00:12Associated Newspapers Limited, in February.
00:14After an article was published that his team claimed caused, quote,
00:17serious damage to his reputation and substantial hurt, embarrassment, and distress, which is continuing.
00:23A judge on Friday ruled that parts of the article were indeed defamatory.
00:27According to ITV, the judge said,
00:30It may be possible to spin facts in a way that does not mislead,
00:33but the allegation being made in the article was very much that the object was to mislead the public.
00:37In his case against the government, Prince Harry is seeking a judicial review
00:41to force them to provide official security for him and his family.
00:44Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, had signaled they would pay for the security,
00:48but they want it to be provided via the home office.
00:50Markle previously successfully sued Associated Newspapers over the publication of a handwritten
00:55letter to her father, Thomas Markle, about the breakdown of their relationship
00:58around the time of the royal wedding.
01:00For that, she was awarded just one pound in damages,
01:03while also getting an undisclosed sum that she donated to charity.
01:06For more on this story and the latest news, go to THR.com.
01:10This is The Hollywood Reporter News.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended