Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 hours ago
Transcript
00:00The latest document dump of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's emails has given us plenty of
00:05examples to show you in terms of media bias. Now while some examples are more subtle, others are
00:11pretty easily spotted attempts to sway a narrative to fit one agenda or another. Political opinions
00:18are pretty strong over Epstein and how the government is handling the case. As you're about
00:23to see, there's a way to frame the facts of this story that's beneficial for both the political left
00:29and the political right. Today, we're going to show you just how left and right-leaning media
00:35outlets do it. We'll be bringing in another guest in this week's episode to help us further peel back
00:40the media's flaws in coverage. Welcome back to Bias Breakdown. Here's the latest stirrup in a
00:48nutshell. House Democrats released three screenshots of email correspondence between Jeffrey Epstein,
00:55Ghislaine Maxwell, and writer Michael Wolff. Hours later, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee
01:00released another 20,000 pages of Epstein documents. These are the files that created a flurry of
01:07headlines, with left and right-leaning media reporting the facts in totally contrasting ways,
01:13a duel over control of the narrative. Here are some examples. A left-leaning headline from Al Jazeera
01:19highlighted this quote from one of the emails released first by House Democrats, an email that
01:25alleged Trump spent hours with victim at Epstein's house. But a right-leaning headline from the New York
01:31Post highlighted the White House's response to that released email, revealing the redacted victim
01:37was Virginia Giuffre, someone who always said Trump never did anything wrong. It's the same sentence from
01:44an email, same story, but framed in two different ways. It fit a broader trend among news outlets and
01:51the perspectives highlighted in headlines by each partisan side. Take these headlines from left-leaning
01:57outlets. These are examples of outlets emphasizing quotes from the emails and Epstein, tying the sex
02:04offender to Trump. But then take these headlines from right-leaning news organizations. These are examples
02:11of outlets emphasizing quotes from the White House and Trump minimizing the emails or ties to Epstein.
02:18We're bringing media watchdog group All Sides back into our conversation this week to further talk
02:24about this media divide and story framing of Epstein. We sent over several stories and together with
02:30All Sides Editor-in-Chief Henry A. Brechter, we broke down different types of biases in the media's
02:36reporting, starting with how some outlets are slanting and spinning the story.
02:43There's a ton of different types of bias at play here. Narrators are being slanted to favor one side
02:49or the other. That's what you see when a particular piece of content is just focused on quotes from
02:54Trump or just focused on quotes from the emails from Epstein and then interpretations of those emails
03:01from people who might be on the left, Democrats or otherwise. So that definitely examples of both
03:07slant and spin, the sort of manipulation and framing of a narrative in such a way that it puts down
03:13the other side of the argument. It wasn't just headlines that would read in contrast of one
03:18another, but take coverage from MSNBC on the left and the Daily Wire on the right. The headlines read
03:24similarly to each other, highlighting another portion of an Epstein email that alleged Trump knew about
03:31the girls. But the story is told very differently within the articles. MSNBC started the story with
03:37multiple Epstein email quotes, then summed up the email correspondence as evidence that undercuts
03:43the president's attempts to distance himself from Epstein. The White House's response is in the last
03:49paragraph. Whereas take the Daily Wire's report and the White House's response is in the first paragraph,
03:56calling it a fake narrative and smear. Their last paragraph starts with Trump not being
04:01accused of any wrongdoing. So it was the same story, nearly identical headlines. But these outlets
04:07favored one political perspective over the other, evident in how they prioritize certain quotes and
04:13voices, which is another form of media bias by viewpoint placement. It's one thing to just not cover
04:21a point of view at all. That's what we call bias by omission, if that's just straight up left out of the
04:27content altogether. Bias by viewpoint placement is a little bit harder to detect sometimes because
04:34that might occur when an article or a podcast or any piece of content, it does include the different
04:41perspectives, but it organizes or addresses them in an imbalanced way. It's not just perspectives or
04:49interpretation of the facts that read differently among left and right news outlets, but the facts
04:55themselves can be construed. There is a discharge petition in the House that just received enough
05:01votes to force House Speaker Mike Johnson to call for the vote on the Epstein file's release. Out of 217
05:08signatures, only these four Republicans put their name on that petition to call for a vote. There were
05:15reports circulating that President Trump spoke with Boebert and Nancy Mace regarding their signatures on
05:21the petition. It was framed by left-leaning Axios as Trump pressuring Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace.
05:27But right-leaning Washington Examiner reported there was no pressure put on the Congresswoman who spoke
05:34with Trump about the Epstein files. When the headlines are in such direct opposition from different sides of
05:41the media on a story like this, it shows that outlets are, unfortunately, a lot of news outlets and
05:47journalists are more focused on appeasing and appealing to their base rather than appealing
05:53to a diverse audience. Two more quick examples for you of how media framing matters. Then the
05:58political analysis behind why these partisan patterns in Epstein coverage persist. First, Politico on the
06:05left, a headline that reads, latest Epstein files knock White House on its heels.
06:10Right away, that headline is framing the White House as being on the defense, as being unstable
06:17and unsteady. The Politico writer describes the emails as the latest blow to a White House
06:23already reeling. Subjective qualifying adjectives like that are something that we see used a lot.
06:30And Politico writes the email revelation followed a brutal week for President Donald Trump.
06:36Even though six paragraphs down, they quote White House officials who pushed back
06:40against their own characterization. Politico describes Trump's wheat as brutal.
06:46That's a very subjective assessment. To reach for such a subjective qualification like that
06:52is a just clear-cut example of bias, something that we point out a lot.
06:57Then there's this article from Newsmax on the right. Trump blasts Dem's Epstein email deflections.
07:04It leads with that charged adjective blasts. And it also uses a quote from Trump calling them
07:11deflections. And in the context of that headline, it does read like Newsmax is endorsing his point
07:18of view. Newsmax describes Trump as coming out swinging in response to the Epstein emails.
07:24And that sort of frames him as, you know, on the attack
07:27and sort of fighting back against unjust criticism.
07:32And throughout the article, only Trump and the White House are quoted.
07:36At all sides, our position is you can't claim to understand an issue if you can't articulate
07:42the side of the issue that you disagree with. If a perspective is omitted entirely from a story,
07:49that's an egregious example of bias.
07:51So why do we see this sort of, quite frankly, obvious divide in how the media is covering this
07:57story? There's a lot of different angles to take, but there are partisan patterns in what
08:02voices to amplify and what information to showcase. Henry has this explanation and analysis to offer
08:09as to why left and right media are choosing to cover Epstein the way that they are.
08:15All that's on the left know that their audience is generally going to be more likely to want to
08:20criticize Trump or find evidence that Trump did something wrong with this story.
08:23So it's natural that they would focus on the critics of Trump.
08:27The right, the exact opposite is true. They know there are audiences looking for information
08:31that absolves Trump. So if they can lead with his defenses or evidence that goes against what
08:37Democrats are presenting, they're going to lead with that. And that's what, that's when you start
08:41dealing with, like I said earlier, these different truths and, and real extreme polarization
08:47on an issue where seemingly there's like no common solution to be, to be had.
08:52The media is aware of the current landscape and left and right media often try to criticize
08:58the opposing side's coverage. NPR criticized right-wing media's coverage, describing it as
09:05shrugging off the story. Meanwhile, the Daily Wire was critical of legacy outlets pointing to
09:11Bill O'Reilly's claim that mainstream media omitted testimony from Epstein attorney Alan Dershowitz
09:17that exonerates President Trump. Henry says this sort of storytelling in the form of finger pointing
09:23says a lot about the current climate.
09:25It's unfortunately illustrative of just how combative all of politics is. And now it's sort
09:31of seeped its way into the media circulation and into how people read about issues and learn about
09:37issues. And that's more of that vicious cycle of constant negativity focused on enemies, covering
09:46that, encouraging readers to engage with that. And then readers become more and more polarized and less,
09:52less open to discussions with people that they disagree with, less open to, you know, the core
09:58functions of a healthy democracy and a healthy society.
10:02And that's your bias breakdown. Thank you so much for watching this week's episode all the way to
10:09the end here. This is a big story with a lot of public interest, and there should be plenty of
10:13updates as the week progresses. The House voted on the Epstein files and President Trump is now calling
10:19on his party to support the release of all files. And the DOJ will likely have to respond. Trump is also
10:26calling for several Epstein related investigations. So it's likely this story will stay in the news
10:32cycle for weeks and maybe even months. So as you continue to follow coverage on this subject,
10:38hopefully you'll keep some of the talking points from today in mind to spot potential media bias and
10:43approach the story with a critical eye. A big thank you to Henry for taking the time to talk with us
10:50about this complex story and for helping identify the media narratives and spin. Now, if you missed
10:56last week's episode, be sure to find our podcast on any of your favorite podcast platforms. There,
11:01you can catch our story on Nigeria and how the media is cherry picking data on Christian deaths.
11:07We had Julie from All Sides help us break down the coverage and explain the left and right media
11:12narratives in that story. And if you're watching me now on either Spotify or YouTube, then help me out,
11:18give us a like and leave me a quick comment. Give me your thoughts on the media you've been consuming
11:24over this Epstein story. And if you've already noticed some of these partisan patterns in your
11:29own news consumption. Thank you to Ian Kennedy, our video editor and Ali Caldwell on our graphics.
11:36Again, thanks to Henry for sharing your perspective with us on this week's episode
11:40and thank you for watching. I'll see you next time.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended