Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 8 hours ago
Transcript
00:00On the good side, I think tariffs are having an effect in keeping that elevated, but should
00:06dissipate over time. On the housing services side, I do expect some further cooling there.
00:13But what really struck me in that piece was that the core services X housing is elevated,
00:20and it's been pretty persistently elevated. And I'm not really convinced that we're seeing signs
00:26that it is coming back to two. Now, the combination matters a lot. So that doesn't have to go all the
00:31way back to two to get PCE to two. But it does need to move in a direction toward two to get us
00:40in that combination. And so that's what one of the things I'm really focused on is this underlying
00:44inflation and the persistence of it. And until I see convincing evidence that we are headed all the
00:53way back to our 2% target, I really do think modestly restrictive policy is appropriate
00:59in balancing our dual mandate objective. We are seeing some cooling, and I see that in the
01:05unemployment rate, which has ticked up a little bit over the course of the year. But it's ticked up
01:10fairly slowly representing a gradual cooling and a gradual cooling that seems appropriate to me
01:16in order to get inflation back to our 2% to our 2% target. So, you know, it is a labor market that's
01:25cooling. It is one that we can collect a lot of data about a data about. It's one that in making
01:33the decision to cut rates in September, we took some preemptive insurance against those declines of
01:39being even larger. But it does not seem like a labor market to me that would see that it would be
01:46appropriate for further preemptive insurance. I think the risks that are there on the labor market
01:50are ones we can continue to monitor. And if we saw more than gradual cooling, then I would think it
01:57would be, you know, appropriate to consider another rate cut.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended