Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 hours ago
Transcript
00:00Why is this happening now? And why Argentina? Why does the U.S. want to do this?
00:04Well, so there's I think we can unpack this in three ways. One is why is the U.S. doing this?
00:10The second is what exactly have we got here? And the third would be how might it all end perhaps
00:18in tears? I'll take on the why. And this actually goes back to that story you mentioned that I did
00:24about Scott Besson, the Treasury Secretary for Bloomberg Businessweek in September. I spoke to
00:30the Treasury Secretary back in late July. And at the time, he told me that one of his overarching goals
00:37in office as the Secretary of the Treasury was to, quote unquote, lock in dollar supremacy.
00:43And I asked him, well, how do you do that? And he said, and I didn't appreciate the significance of
00:50it at the time was by facilitating swaps through the Treasury Department, as opposed to the way
00:57that swaps have traditionally been facilitated, which is by the Fed from central bank to central
01:03bank. Now, there is precedent for this. The Treasury Department did that for Mexico back
01:07in the mid 90s during the peso crisis. And it helped. And maybe it'll help Argentina.
01:13But it appears that under the Trump administration, the government's focus is on, again, cuts to the
01:21why. It's not just about locking in dollar supremacy. It's using the dollar as an economic
01:26tool to support countries with which the United States feel it has some kind of ideological
01:32kinship or some kind of trading relationship. It's not like Argentina has been one of America's
01:38major trading partners. It has not. The amount of bilateral trade that goes on between those
01:43two countries is a fraction of what it is with the United States and Mexico or the United States
01:47and Canada or even the United States and Europe. So in that respect, it's unusual. I think if you
01:53think about it, though, in terms of locking in dollar supremacy and using the dollar as an economic
01:58tool and a tool of geo strategy, if you will, it begins to make a little more sense.
02:06You said that there are three different elements that we could we could talk about with this. One
02:11is how another one is how this could end. Let's talk about the what is it that we're actually
02:18talking about? You mentioned that the Treasury Secretary today talked about it as a bridge to
02:24a better economic future and and not a bailout and not a bailout. But the operative word there is
02:30bridge because bridge means something from here to there. In other words, what's the there? This is a
02:35bridge until when? Right. Is it a bridge until after Argentina's midterm elections on the 26th of
02:41this month, Sunday? Is it Trump seemed to suggest as much the other day when he said, well, you know,
02:47if Malay doesn't win, we'll get rid of the swap line. So that's one possibility. Is it a bridge until
02:53Argentina decides to abandon the peso peg, which Sturzenegger, the minister for deregulation and state
03:01trans transformation said was in the cards just last week when I interviewed him here in New York?
03:07Is it a is it a bridge until the 20 billion dollars runs out, which might happen because
03:14Argentina was burning through a billion and a half dollars with a foreign currency reserves a week,
03:19a billion and a half a week before the swap line was put in place? Is it until Argentina's economy
03:25can eventually support an exchange rate at this level? It certainly can't right now.
03:32Or maybe is it a bridge until I don't know, President Trump just loses patience or President
03:37Malay does something to annoy him? It's a lot of any of those. It's a lot of questions. It's a lot of
03:42like possible scenarios. You know, Bloomberg report out yesterday that Jamie Dimon is visiting Argentina
03:46this week, kind of an unprecedented show of support for the government at the mean at the same time
03:52we've had. I think it's The Wall Street Journal reporting that banks are having a hard time kind
03:56of getting around this without some kind of guarantees. Nobody knows. Nobody knows what
04:01Argentina is pledging as collateral. In fact, nobody has seen the agreement to our knowledge.
04:06Right. The banks themselves, which are playing intermediary roles here, don't know what Argentina
04:12has agreed to pledge, you know, so that the United States isn't just on the unlimited losing end of a bad
04:21trade. I mean, that is possible here, right? The big difference between what's going on here and
04:28the comparison that everybody wants to make with the trade that broke the Bank of England, that the
04:33Treasury Secretary was involved in when he worked for George Soros and Stan Druckenmiller back in the
04:38early 1990s. The big difference here is that then the UK had nobody backstopping them. Now Argentina has the
04:45United States backstopping it. But as I say, nobody knows until when. Nobody knows if there are any
04:53mechanisms that have been put in place to make the U.S. taxpayer, if you will, whole, should the
04:59Treasury Department sustain losses on this trade. I've heard that Argentina's uranium reserves may be
05:05involved, that some kind of preferential access to Argentine markets might be involved. Who knows?
05:11It's just it's so it's like it's like a ready aim fire, you know, or a fire, you know, ready aim in
05:19the sense that the swap line was put in place. And then it appears since no document has surfaced yet
05:24that all of the mechanics behind it are being taken care of after the fact. I don't know. But my point is
05:32that if anybody knows he or she has to say, hey, I know. Yeah. The Treasury Secretary, as you mentioned,
05:39described this as a bridge to a better economic future for Argentina, not a bailout. Is the not
05:44a bailout part a fair way to describe it in your view? Is this not a bailout? I think a bailout is
05:48in the eye of the beholder. In some respects, it's unquestionably a gift to President Millay ahead of
05:57these midterm elections. It isn't working for the time being, right? The peso fresh weakened today to a
06:05fresh low and Argentine bonds, which had gained earlier on the formal announcement of this
06:11agreement, have since given up those gains and I think are posting losses. So it would appear to be
06:17a gift in the sense that the peso exchange rate or the peg to the dollar is unsustainable. Millay
06:23doesn't want to allow the peso to float freely. He wants to maintain this peg so that Argentine
06:28inflation is under control, a critical, critical economic consideration going into the midterms.
06:35So even if Argentine, if inflate, like there's no question, if the peso peg were to be abandoned
06:40today, it's not like inflation would, inflation would show up immediately, but it wouldn't show
06:47up in official statistics, excuse me, for some time to come. But Argentines are so conditioned to
06:52this. Right. They know what would happen.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended