- 3 weeks ago
A must watch.
Category
đź“š
LearningTranscript
00:00In the year 451, a great and momentous gathering took place.
00:05The Roman Empire, though creaking under the weight of its own immense history and facing threats from beyond its borders, still commanded the world.
00:13It was in Chalcedon, a bustling city just across the glittering waters of the Bosphorus from Constantinople, that this assembly was called.
00:21Imagine the scene. Hundreds of bishops, the powerful leaders of the Christian Church, traveling from every corner of the Eastern Roman Empire.
00:30They came from the sun-scorched lands of Egypt and Syria, from the ancient cities of Anatolia, and from the sophisticated heart of the Empire in Greece.
00:39It was a sea of robes, beards, and stern expressions, a gathering of the most influential men of their time.
00:45They were not there to discuss politics in the way a Senate might, nor were they there to plan military campaigns.
00:51Their business was something far more fundamental, something that touched the very soul of their faith.
00:57They had come to settle a question that had been tearing the Christian world apart for decades.
01:02Who, precisely, was Jesus Christ?
01:05This was no small matter. It was the central mystery of their religion, and getting it right was, in their eyes, a matter of eternal salvation.
01:12The men who attended were a mix of theologians, politicians, and patriarchs, each with his own loyalties, his own understanding of Scripture and his own ambitions.
01:22The air was thick with anticipation and the scent of old disagreements.
01:27This was not the first time the Church had held such a council.
01:29It was in fact the fourth of what would come to be known as the Great Ecumenical Councils.
01:34Meetings where the entire church, or what was considered to be the entire church, came together to define its beliefs.
01:42The emperor himself, Martian had called it, along with his powerful wife, the Empress Pulcaria.
01:48The state and the church were now deeply intertwined, and a fractured church meant a fractured empire.
01:54Unity was the goal, but unity was a fragile thing.
01:57These bishops, some old and frail, others fiery and full of conviction, represented not just theological viewpoints, but entire regions, cultures, and peoples.
02:08The city of Chalcedon itself was a stage perfectly set for this drama.
02:12A stone's throw from the imperial capital, it was under the watchful eye of the emperor.
02:17The council was held in the magnificent church of St. Euphemia the Martyr, a building grand enough to house the more than 500 bishops who eventually attended.
02:26It was the largest gathering of its kind up to that point in history.
02:30They met not as equals in a friendly debate, but as factions in a spiritual war.
02:35The stakes were immense.
02:37The decisions made in that church would echo through the corridors of history,
02:41shaping the very definition of Christianity for centuries to come,
02:44and creating divisions that have lasted to this very day.
02:48September 15, 2025.
02:50To understand the firestorm at Chalcedon, we must first go back to the core question that fueled the flames.
02:57For Christians, Jesus was both God and man.
03:00This was the paradox at the heart of their faith.
03:03He was the Son of God, divine and eternal, yet he had walked the earth as a human being.
03:08He was born, he ate, he suffered, he died.
03:11How could one person be both things at once?
03:13How did the divine and the human relate to each other inside the single person of Jesus Christ?
03:19It was a theological puzzle box, and every attempt to solve it seemed to open another, more complicated one.
03:25It was a question that had vexed the greatest minds of the church for generations.
03:29Two major schools of thought had emerged, each with its own way of explaining this mystery.
03:34One was strongly associated with the great theological center of Antioch.
03:38These thinkers, who would later be labeled Nestorians, were very keen to protect the distinctness of Christ's two natures.
03:45They argued that the divine Son of God and the human Jesus were joined in a perfect harmony, a kind of moral union, but the two remained separate.
03:54To them it was vital that Christ's humanity was real and complete, not swallowed up by his divinity.
03:59They feared that if you blurred the lines too much, you would lose the Jesus who truly suffered on the cross as a man.
04:05On the other side was the influential school of Alexandria in Egypt.
04:10The Alexandrians were deeply focused on the unity of Christ.
04:13They emphasized that he was one person, the divine Word made flesh.
04:17They feared that splitting Christ into two separate natures as they accused the Antiochens of doing would result in two sons, not one.
04:25These were not just abstract philosophical debates for dusty scholars.
04:29They had profound implications for worship and salvation.
04:32The road to Chalcedon was paved with the rubble of previous failed attempts.
04:37Just 20 years earlier in 431, the Council of Ephesus had met to confront Nestorius, patriarch of Constantinople.
04:45Nestorius from the Antiochene school, was accused of dividing Christ into two persons.
04:50His opponents led by Cyril of Alexandria triumphed.
04:53Nestorius was condemned and sent into exile.
04:56Cyril's formula, one incarnate nature of the word, became the banner of orthodoxy for many, especially in Egypt.
05:03But the victory at Ephesus did not bring peace.
05:06It only shifted the battle lines.
05:08Cyril's successor Dioscarus was even more uncompromising.
05:11He saw it as his sacred duty to defend Cyril's theology.
05:14His main target was a new wave of thought from Constantinople which he called a revival of Nestorianism.
05:20Central to the controversy was Eutyches, an elderly abbot, who pushed the one-nature idea to the extreme, saying Christ's humanity was nearly dissolved in his divinity like a drop of honey in the sea.
05:33Eutyches's teaching was condemned by a local synod in Constantinople, but he had powerful friends including Dioscorus.
05:40This set the stage for one of church history's most infamous episodes.
05:43In 449 a second council was called at Ephesus, presided over by Dioscorus.
05:49This meeting was not a debate, it was an ambush.
05:53Dioscorus arrived with a mob of thuggish monks and soldiers, determined to impose his will.
05:59Bishops who disagreed were intimidated, threatened, and physically beaten.
06:03The patriarch Flavian, who had condemned Eutyches, was so brutally assaulted he died days later.
06:09The gathering, meant as a definitive triumph for one-nature theology, was so violent and corrupt it was later named, the Latrocinium, the robber council.
06:19Pope Leova I, of Rome, who had sent a letter, was furious when his legates were ignored and his letter was not even read.
06:26He declared the council null and void.
06:29Instead of unifying the church, the robber council had shattered it.
06:33The political winds shifted dramatically in the year 450.
06:36Theodosius II died after falling from his horse.
06:40He was succeeded by Martian.
06:42Polcaria his wife supported two-nature theology and opposed Dioscorus.
06:46They moved to undo the damage of 449.
06:49A divided church threatened imperial stability.
06:52A new council was summoned to be free from intimidation and violence.
06:56Bishops packed and journeyed to decide the future of the faith.
06:59The council opened in October 451, electric with tension.
07:03This was not a gathering of friends.
07:06Dioscorus of Alexandria, Egyptian bishops, bishops from Antioch and Syria, imperial commissioners, papal legates of Pope Leo I, the first business, the robber council's events.
07:17The minutes were read aloud.
07:19Shock and shame swept the assembly.
07:21Bishop after bishop stood to renounce their coerced signatures.
07:24We all sinned.
07:25We all ask for forgiveness.
07:27The focus turned on Dioscorus, accused of violence, accused of procedural corruption, accused of heresy, for rejecting the two-nature's formula.
07:35He stood defiant but his support crumbled.
07:38Debates grew fierce and passionate.
07:40Commissioners struggled to keep order as bishops shouted, Dioscorus, formidable theologian and debater yet cornered.
07:47He invoked Cyril of Alexandria and the Council of Ephesus.
07:50Opponents, backed by imperial officials and papal legates, pressed their advantage.
07:54This was a trial as much as a theological debate.
07:58By the end of the third session, the verdict was in.
08:01Dioscorus was deposed and condemned.
08:04The path was clear to forge a new definition of faith.
08:07With Dioscorus removed, the council could finally turn to its primary task, creating a statement of faith that would settle the question of Christ's nature once and for all.
08:16But, you know, this was easier said than done.
08:18Many bishops, especially those from Palestine and Illyricum, were still deeply attached to the theology of Cyril of Alexandria, and were, well, pretty suspicious of any new formula.
08:29They feared that talk of two natures was just a back door to the condemned heresy of Nestorianism.
08:34So, they wanted to stick with the creed of the Council of Nicaea, and the condemnations of Ephesus, and just leave it at that.
08:41For them, adding anything new was dangerous and unnecessary.
08:45However, the imperial commissioners and the papal legates were insistent.
08:49The emperor wanted a clear, unambiguous definition that would unify the empire.
08:54Pope Leo's legates, for their part, demanded that the council formally approve the Tome of Leo.
08:58This letter, written by the Pope, was really a masterful piece of theology.
09:04It carefully balanced the two sides of the argument, affirming that Christ was one person, yet possessing two full and distinct natures.
09:12One divine, one human.
09:14He is complete in his own nature and complete in ours, Leo wrote.
09:18The Tome was a powerful attempt to find a middle way, to honor Christ's unity and the reality of his two natures.
09:24So, a committee was appointed to draft a new definition.
09:28They wrestled with the precise wording, knowing that every single word would be scrutinized for even a hint of heresy.
09:35They had to find language that would satisfy the supporters of Pope Leo and the Antiochians,
09:40who insisted on the two natures, without alienating the more moderate followers of Cyril, who feared any hint of division in Christ.
09:48The key was to find a way to say that the two natures existed together without confusion, without change, without division, without separation.
09:55These four crucial adverbs became the pillars of the final statement.
10:00In the fifth session of the council the new definition was presented.
10:04It was a masterpiece of theological diplomacy.
10:07It affirmed the previous council of Nicaea.
10:09It affirmed the previous council of Ephesus.
10:12It praised the work of Cyril, and formally approved the Tome of Leo.
10:16Then came the critical passage.
10:18It declared that Christ is to be acknowledged in two natures, which come together into one person, one hypostasis.
10:25When the definition was read aloud, the bishops erupted in acclamation.
10:29This is the faith of the fathers.
10:31This is the faith of the apostles.
10:33We all believe this.
10:35Peter has spoken through Leo.
10:37It seemed, at least in that moment, that unity had finally been achieved.
10:41The triumphant shouts in the Church of St. Euphemia did not echo for long.
10:45The Chalcedonian definition, crafted as a bridge between factions, quickly became a wall that divided them.
10:52While the majority of the bishops at the council signed on, some with genuine enthusiasm, others with reluctant acceptance under imperial pressure,
11:00a significant and determined opposition began to form almost immediately.
11:05The ink was barely dry on the council documents before the trouble started.
11:08The problem was that for many, especially in the eastern provinces of the empire,
11:14the new definition sounded suspiciously like Nestorianism they had fought so hard against.
11:19The core of the resistance came from the bishops of Egypt.
11:22They were fiercely loyal to their deposed patriarch Dioscorus, and to the theology of Cyril of Alexandria as they understood it.
11:30For them, the phrase in two natures was a betrayal.
11:33It seemed to split Christ in two, undermining the central belief in the one, unified Son of God who had become flesh.
11:40They saw the council not as a victory for orthodoxy, but as a victory for the school of Antioch and for Rome over the venerable and powerful Church of Alexandria.
11:50They refused to accept the council's decisions, and when they returned to Egypt,
11:54they were greeted not as heretics, but as heroes who had stood firm against imperial and theological bullying.
12:01The opposition was not limited to Egypt.
12:03In Syria, many monks rejected Chalcedon.
12:06In Palestine, many clergy rejected Chalcedon.
12:09In Armenia, many ordinary Christians rejected Chalcedon.
12:12In these regions, the one nature or Maya physite understanding of Christ was deeply embedded in their spiritual life and identity.
12:18For them, the council's definition was an imposed, Greek-speaking imperial theology that felt alien to their traditions.
12:26Riots broke out in Alexandria and in Antioch.
12:29Imperial attempts to install pro-Chalcedonian bishops were met with violent resistance.
12:34The emperor had wanted unity, but what he got was rebellion.
12:38On the other side, the supporters of Chalcedon were just as firm.
12:42For the pope in Rome, the council's affirmation of his tome was a major victory,
12:46cementing the authority of the Roman see.
12:48For the patriarch of Constantinople and the bishops of the Greek-speaking heartland of the empire,
12:54the definition was a necessary clarification that steered a safe course between Nestorianism and monophysitism.
13:01They saw the opponents of the council as stubborn heretics who refused to accept the reasoned judgment of the universal church.
13:09The immediate result of the council was not peace, but a hardening of positions and the beginning of a bitter empire-wide conflict.
13:17The failure to enforce the Chalcedonian definition across the entire empire led to the first major lasting split in the body of the church.
13:27This schism predates the great schism between Rome and Constantinople by nearly 600 years.
13:32The churches that rejected Chalcedon, primarily in Egypt and Syria, began to develop their own separate hierarchies, traditions, and theological language.
13:42They did not see themselves as heretics.
13:45They believed they were preserving the true ancient faith against Chalcedon's innovations.
13:49Centuries have passed since bishops met in that great church by the Bosphorus, yet the decisions they made continue to shape the Christian faith.
13:58For the vast majority of Christians today, Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, most Protestants,
14:04the Chalcedonian definition remains the cornerstone of Christology.
14:07It is the official authoritative statement defining Orthodox boundaries.
14:11It provides the language and framework for understanding Jesus as fully God and fully man,
14:17one person in two natures, a mystery held in balance.
14:20Chalcedon's legacy is unity and also division.
14:24The Oriental Orthodox churches, Coptic, Syriac, Armenian, Ethiopian, Eritrean, Malankara,
14:30continue to stand by non-Chalcedonian heritage.
14:32For centuries labeled monophysite heretics by Chalcedonian churches, a label they reject as inaccurate and offensive,
14:40they prefer myophysite, one united nature, they do not deny Christ's humanity,
14:45but see it as perfectly united with his divinity in a single composite nature.
14:50This disagreement remains a barrier to full Christian unity.
14:53But in recent decades there's been a hopeful shift.
14:56Old insults gave way to respectful dialogue.
14:58Theologians from both traditions have met, discussed, shared history, re-examined 5th century language.
15:05They concluded differences may have been about terminology, politics, culture,
15:10not about a fundamental disagreement in faith.
15:13Both sides were trying to say the same thing using different philosophical languages.
15:17This modern dialogue stems from 451.
15:20It attempts to heal a wound 1, 500 plus years old.
15:24Joint declarations have been signed between popes and oriental patriarchs,
15:29eastern orthodox and oriental orthodox leaders, acknowledging a common faith in Christ.
15:35Full institutional unity isn't achieved yet, but animosity has largely been replaced by brotherhood
15:40and a shared desire to overcome the divisions from Chalcedon.
15:44The council's legacy is still being written.
15:46The Council of Chalcedon stands as a monumental event in the history of Christianity,
15:50a moment of profound definition and tragic division.
15:54It was an assembly born of crisis, an attempt by an empire,
15:57an attempt by a church to impose order on a theological storm.
16:01The definition it produced was a remarkable intellectual achievement,
16:05a finely balanced creed that sought to navigate treacherous waters between competing heresies.
16:11For billions of Christians, it remains the definitive statement on the identity of Jesus Christ,
16:16the bedrock of their faith.
16:17It provided a vocabulary for mystery, a human attempt to articulate the divine.
16:23Yet, the settlement of 451 was never truly settled.
16:26The unity it proclaimed was an illusion,
16:29a victory celebrated in Constantinople and Rome,
16:32rejected with passion and fury in Alexandria and Antioch.
16:36The council that was meant to heal the church instead,
16:38inflicted a wound so deep that it has not yet healed.
16:42It shows a recurring theme in history,
16:45declarations of authority.
16:46No matter how powerful the emperor,
16:48no matter how numerous the bishops,
16:50cannot command the ascent of the human heart and mind.
16:54Faith, identity, tradition,
16:56are powerful currents, resisting even the strongest imperial tide.
17:00The story of Chalcedon is a lesson in the complex interplay of theology,
17:04power, culture and language.
17:06The theological quarrel had very real world-changing consequences,
17:10arguably weakening the empire's hold on provinces,
17:13making them more susceptible to the Arab conquests, two centuries later.
17:17Today, as we look back from 2025, the legacy of Chalcedon is a dual one.
17:22It is a story of a faith that sought clarity and found it, but at the cost of charity.
17:27It is also a story of enduring division,
17:29a family of churches separated for a millennium and a half,
17:32over what modern dialogue suggests may have been a profound misunderstanding.
17:36The council's enduring importance lies not just in the doctrine it defined,
17:40but in the enduring painful and now hopeful quest to understand one another,
17:45to perhaps one day,
17:46heal the divisions forged in the crucible of that ancient, fateful gathering.
Recommended
9:20
|
Up next
2:00
1:15
0:40
0:52
1:15
1:32
1:23:45
1:12
14:46
1:45
Be the first to comment