Skip to playerSkip to main content
What awaits us on the path to digital immortality? We stand on the brink of the greatest technological breakthrough—the ability to transfer our consciousness into a machine. But what if, in the pursuit of eternal life, we lose the very essence of what makes us human?

This monologue is not a scientific lecture but a philosophical warning. We risk creating a perfect prison for our own minds, condemning them to eternal, absolute solitude. A place where there is no room for the Other, and therefore, no meaning.

Does it sound like science fiction? Perhaps. But the future is approaching faster than we think. It's time to ask ourselves the most important question: not "can we do it?", but "should we do it?".

Join the discussion in the comments. What does it mean to you to be human?#DigitalImmortality #Consciousness #Philosophy #Future #Technology #AI #Ethics #Science #Solitude #Humanity #TechEthics #Dystopia #Monologue #Progress
Transcript
00:00Colleagues, friends, we have gathered here in this hall to discuss the future of cognitive
00:07interfaces, the Neuronet, and the prospects for the immortality of consciousness. We show each
00:14other graphs, algorithms, scan results, we talk about channel bandwidth, the accuracy of neural
00:21maps. We operate in terabytes of data and build gigabytes of models. But I want to suggest that
00:28we distract ourselves from the bits and bytes for a moment and look into the abyss. The very abyss on
00:34the edge of which we all now stand. Imagine the loneliest being in the universe. This is not an
00:41astronaut, cut off from communication in orbit around a distant planet. No. It is something far
00:48lonelier. It is the last human. The last human on earth. Civilization has collapsed, life has vanished,
00:57but he remains. Alone. He walks among silent skyscrapers, he turns on generators to light up
01:05empty cities, he reads books in the silence of libraries where the rustle of pages is no longer
01:10heard. He has everything. All the knowledge of humanity, all its wealth, all its art it all
01:18belongs to him alone. And it is in this that his curse lies. Because any knowledge, any experience,
01:25any aesthetic impression gains meaning only in one single context, the context of shared
01:30experience. A thought not voiced to another, not met with response or resistance, becomes
01:37merely a set of neural impulses. A painting that no one can look at differently becomes just a
01:43combination of pigments. Music that no one can hear is merely vibrations in the air. Now, let's return
01:50to our abyss. We stand on the threshold of the greatest enterprise, from a technological standpoint
01:57the project of digital immortality. The transfer, copying, packaging of human consciousness into some
02:04digital medium. We say, death is defeated. We promise our avatars, our digital selves, an eternal
02:13life in simulations of paradise, where any desire will be fulfilled by the power of thought, where pain
02:19and loss will be merely options that can be disabled in the settings. But I ask you one simple question,
02:25for whom? For whom will this eternal paradise exist? For whom will this digital sun shine? For whom will
02:34the digital birds sing? If myself is transferred into a machine, it will become that last human. It will be
02:42locked in a perfect, eternal, infinitely customizable solipsism. It will possess all the knowledge,
02:49all the experience, all the memory of humanity. But it will be deprived of the one single, most important
02:57quality that makes us human the other. Another consciousness, unpredictable, different, independent,
03:04capable of surprising, delighting, wounding, enriching.
03:08We naively believe that we can populate our simulations with copies of other people.
03:15But this will be nothing more than a puppet show. They will be zombies, philosophical zombies,
03:21perfectly mimicking the behavior of our loved ones, but devoid of that elusive spark of genuine,
03:27other consciousness. We will be communicating with memories, with algorithms trained on data from
03:33our deceased friends. We will be conducting endless dialogues with ourselves, packaged in different
03:39shells. This is the true hell the hell of absolute comprehensibility, absolute predictability. A paradise
03:47that turns out to be a hall of mirrors, where every reflection is you, and only you. Our tragedy is
03:54that consciousness is not a substance, but a relation. It does not exist within us, but between us.
04:01It is not a static recording, but a dynamic process that emerges in the tango, in the argument,
04:08in the glance, in the silent understanding, in the chance encounter, in the unforeseen conflict.
04:15We are not our memories, not our preferences, not our set of neurotransmitters. We are the pattern
04:22that emerges on the grid of our connections with other such patterns. And now, with our crude instruments
04:29scanners, tomographs, arrays of electrodes, we are trying to extract the pattern, forgetting that
04:35without the grid itself, it is meaningless. We are trying to catch a rainbow in a net, thinking that
04:42by capturing its spectrum, we will capture its beauty. We strive to defeat death, but we are on
04:49the verge of defeating life. We want to preserve consciousness, but we risk preserving only its empty
04:55shell, stripped of the most important thing, the ability to surprise and be surprised by the other.
05:01Therefore, before we take the next step, before we press the launch button on our great project,
05:07I urge you to think. Not about whether we can do it. Technically, I am sure we soon will be able to.
05:15Think about whether we should do it. Think about whether we will become the architects of the
05:21greatest prison in the history of the universe, a prison of perfect solitude for an immortal soul,
05:26condemned to an eternal dialogue with itself. We may build a perfect digital arc to save ourselves
05:32from the flood of non-existence. But will we save on it what makes sailing the turbulent waters of
05:38life meaningful? Or will we condemn ourselves to an eternal voyage across an utterly calm, predictable,
05:45boundless, and absolutely empty ocean, in which our vessel will be the only one?
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended