- 2 weeks ago
Category
🎥
Short filmTranscript
00:00A new scramble has begun. The prize isn't just minerals, it's Africa's soul.
00:14There are stories told in the hushed corridors of power, and then there is the truth that is lived on the ground.
00:23This week, the White House hosted what it called an African Leaders Summit, a discussion of commercial opportunities.
00:31This is the official story, but this is not a news report. This is an unwritten verdict.
00:37The truth for those with eyes to see is that this was not a meeting of partners.
00:42It was an audition. It was the latest scene in a play that has been running for more than a century.
00:48A drama of exploitation that has been updated for a new era with new actors, but with the same tragic script.
00:57We are told this is about business, about investment, about a new relationship between America and Africa, but look closer.
01:05Look past the handshakes and the carefully worded communiques.
01:08What you will see is the ghost of an old scramble.
01:12A new great game being played across the continent.
01:15This is not a battle for territory marked by flags and armies, but a silent, sophisticated war for the very elements that power our modern world.
01:26The critical minerals buried beneath African soil.
01:30This is a geopolitical chess match between the United States and China, and Africa is the board.
01:37This investigation will not just report the events, it will connect the patterns, it will trace the lines from the colonial treaties of the 19th century to the investment agreements of the 21st.
01:50It will expose how the language of partnership is used to mask the mechanics of plunder, and it will reveal the deepest truth of all.
01:59This is a battle for the soul of Africa.
02:01It is a struggle for its future, its identity, and its fundamental right to self-determination.
02:07This is a warning, a revelation, and a call to awakening for the people of a continent at a crossroads.
02:14The verdict on Africa's destiny is being written now, not in the press releases of Washington, but in the hearts and minds of its people.
02:23Section 1. Echoes of the Past. The Colonial Blueprint for Extraction.
02:29To understand the chessboard of today, you must first understand how the board was built.
02:34The strategies being deployed in Africa now are not new.
02:38They are refinements of a colonial blueprint drawn up over a century ago.
02:44The methods of control have been polished, the language softened, but the core objective, the extraction of wealth, remains unchanged.
02:52The past is not just a memory, it is an active force shaping the present.
02:57The scramble for Africa and the Berlin Conference.
03:01In the late 1800s, the industrial furnaces of Western Europe demanded fuel.
03:06Their own resources of coal, minerals, and wood were dwindling.
03:12Across the Mediterranean, a continent of seemingly inexhaustible wealth beckoned.
03:17This hunger triggered the scramble for Africa, a frantic rush by powers like Britain, France, Germany, and Belgium
03:24to claim a piece of the continent for themselves.
03:28This chaotic land grab was formalized at the 1884 Berlin Conference.
03:33It is crucial to understand what this conference truly was.
03:38It was not a negotiation with Africa.
03:40It was a negotiation about Africa.
03:43No African leaders were invited.
03:45They had no voice in the proceedings that would decide their fate.
03:50European powers, with maps spread across a table in Germany,
03:54drew lines that carved up ancient kingdoms and societies,
03:59ignoring the cultural and linguistic borders that had existed for centuries.
04:05They established international protocols for colonization,
04:09a set of rules for how they would divide the spoils among themselves.
04:13This act was the original sin of modern colonialism in Africa.
04:18It created a framework where the continent was not a collection of peoples and nations,
04:24but a disputed territory ripe for exploitation,
04:28a repository of raw materials essential for keeping foreign industries thriving.
04:34The template of deception, the Rudd Concession case study.
04:39The Berlin Conference set the stage,
04:42but the real work of dispossession happened on the ground
04:45through treaties and concessions that were masterpieces of fraud.
04:50There is no clearer example of this colonial blueprint
04:53than the Rudd Concession of 1888,
04:57a document that sealed the fate of what would become Zimbabwe.
05:00The act of deception was breathtaking in its audacity.
05:05Three agents of the British imperialist Cecil Rhodes,
05:08Charles Rudd, James Maguire, and Francis Thompson,
05:12approached King Lubangula of the Indebeli people.
05:17They presented him with a document that,
05:20in exchange for a monthly payment of a hundred,
05:23one thousand rifles and a steamboat,
05:26granted them the complete and exclusive charge
05:29over all metals and minerals situated and contained in my kingdoms.
05:35Lubangula, a powerful king who Rhodes himself admitted
05:39was the only block to Central Africa,
05:42was tricked into signing away the mineral wealth of his entire nation.
05:47This was not merely a swindle between individuals,
05:50it was the weaponization of legality.
05:53The piece of paper signed by Lubangula
05:55was immediately treated as a binding legal contract in the eyes of the West.
06:01Rhodes used the concession to secure a royal charter from the British government
06:05for his British South Africa company, BSAC, in 1889,
06:12effectively giving his private enterprise the state's blessing to colonize the territory.
06:17The fraud was laundered through the colonizer's own legal system,
06:23transforming an act of theft into a state-sanctioned enterprise.
06:26The deception ran even deeper.
06:29To secure Lubangula's signature,
06:31Rhodes' agents made crucial oral promises
06:33that were never included in the written document.
06:36They assured the king that no more than ten white men
06:39would ever enter his lands to work,
06:41that they would not dig near towns,
06:43and that they would abide by his laws.
06:45Lubangula considered these promises part of the agreement.
06:48The British, however,
06:50considered only the written text,
06:51which they had crafted, to be binding.
06:54This established a devastating precedent.
06:56The word of the colonizer was law,
06:58while the understanding of the colonized was irrelevant.
07:01The final turn of the screw demonstrates
07:03how mineral rights were just the first step.
07:05The Rudd concession did not grant land rights.
07:08So, Rhodes engineered another deception.
07:10He used an agent named Edward Lippert
07:13to secure a separate concession from Lubangula
07:16for the exclusive right to grant land,
07:18leading the king to believe Lippert was a rival to Rhodes.
07:21Once secured, Rhodes promptly bought the Lippert concession,
07:24consolidating both mineral and land rights.
07:27This multi-step maneuver,
07:29from a fraudulent mineral deal to a deceptive land deal,
07:32culminated in the total dispossession of the Indebelli people
07:35and the creation of a new colony, Rhodesia,
07:39built on a foundation of lies.
07:41This was not conquest by brute force alone.
07:43It was conquest by contract,
07:45a sophisticated system of legalized plunder
07:48that would become the template for neocolonialism.
07:51Section 2.
07:52The Illusion of Independence
07:53Neocolonialism's Modern Chains
07:56The flags of independence were raised across Africa
07:59in the mid-20th century,
08:00and the world celebrated the end of colonialism.
08:04But this was a powerful illusion.
08:06Political freedom did not bring economic sovereignty.
08:09The chains of direct colonial rule were broken,
08:12only to be replaced by the invisible shackles of neocolonialism.
08:15The empires did not disappear.
08:18They simply changed their tactics.
08:20Defining Neocolonialism
08:22The first president of Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah,
08:25was one of the first to name this new enemy.
08:27In his seminal work,
08:28Neocolonialism,
08:30The Last Stage of Imperialism,
08:31he laid bare the truth.
08:33He defined a neocolonial state as one that is,
08:36in theory,
08:37independent
08:37and has all the outward trappings of international sovereignty.
08:41In reality,
08:42its economic system
08:44and thus its political policy
08:46is directed from outside.
08:48This,
08:49Nkrumah warned,
08:50was imperialism in its final
08:52and perhaps its most dangerous stage
08:54because it maintains control
08:56without the obvious presence
08:57of a colonial administrator,
08:59making it harder to identify and fight.
09:02The mechanisms of this modern control
09:04are subtle
09:05but devastatingly effective.
09:07It is a system of economic strangulation
09:10where foreign capital
09:11is used for the exploitation
09:13rather than for the development of Africa.
09:16Multinational corporations,
09:18many based in the former colonial powers,
09:21control Africa's most valuable resources,
09:23its gold, diamonds, oil, and copper.
09:25They extract these resources,
09:27repatriate the enormous profits
09:29to their home countries,
09:30and leave behind environmental devastation
09:32and impoverished communities.
09:34This system perpetuates
09:36the colonial economic model.
09:38Africa remains a supplier
09:40of cheap raw materials to the world
09:42while being forced
09:43to import expensive manufactured goods,
09:46a trade imbalance
09:46that guarantees perpetual dependency.
09:49Debt is another powerful weapon
09:51in the neocolonial arsenal.
09:53Loans from international financial institutions
09:56like the World Bank and IMF,
09:58often presented as aid,
09:59come with conditions
10:00that force African nations
10:02to adopt policies
10:03that benefit foreign investors
10:05over their own people.
10:07This debt dependency
10:08limits a nation's financial sovereignty,
10:10forcing it to prioritize repayment
10:12over funding
10:13for essential services
10:14like health and education.
10:16The system is propped up
10:17by the complicity
10:18of a small local elite
10:20who often benefit personally
10:21from these arrangements.
10:23They become,
10:23as one analysis describes,
10:25minions to the whims
10:26and caprices
10:27of the ex-colonial lords,
10:29managing the state
10:30on behalf of foreign interests.
10:32The spiritual consequence,
10:34the identity crisis,
10:35the material poverty
10:36created by neocolonialism
10:38is plain to see,
10:38but its deepest,
10:39most corrosive impact
10:40is spiritual.
10:41The ultimate aim
10:42and most insidious effect
10:44of this system
10:44is the creation
10:45of a profound
10:46African identity crisis.
10:48When a nation's economic
10:49and political destiny
10:50is controlled
10:51from the outside,
10:52it is robbed
10:53of its agency
10:54and its right
10:55to self-determination.
10:56A people
10:57who cannot control
10:58their own house
10:58begin to question
10:59who they are.
11:01This fosters
11:01a clash
11:02between traditional values
11:03and external influences,
11:05leading to cultural fragmentation,
11:08a disconnect
11:08from history and heritage,
11:10and a crisis of purpose.
11:13The educational systems
11:14left behind by colonizers
11:16often perpetuate this,
11:18marginalizing indigenous knowledge
11:20and teaching a history
11:21that glorifies the conqueror.
11:23This is the true
11:24spiritual battlefield.
11:25Neocolonialism seeks
11:26to convince Africans
11:28that they are incapable
11:29of governing themselves,
11:30that their own cultures
11:31are inferior,
11:33and that their only path
11:34to development
11:34is to follow the models
11:36dictated by the West.
11:38It is a psychological war
11:39designed to break
11:40the spirit of a people,
11:42to erode their collective confidence,
11:44and to undermine
11:45their very belief
11:46that they can and should be
11:47the masters
11:47of their own destiny.
11:49This induced state
11:50of dependency
11:51is a self-perpetuating cycle.
11:53A people without
11:54a strong unified identity,
11:56lacks the collective will
11:57to challenge
11:58the powerful external forces
12:00that exploit them,
12:02which in turn
12:02deepens the economic subjugation
12:04and reinforces
12:06the crisis of identity.
12:08Breaking this cycle
12:09is the great challenge
12:10of our time.
12:12Section 3
12:12The New Scramble
12:14A Two-Headed Dragon
12:15Over Africa
12:16The geopolitical landscape
12:17of the 21st century
12:19has brought a new dynamic
12:20to the age-old exploitation
12:21of Africa.
12:22The continent is now
12:24the primary arena
12:25for a great power competition
12:26between the United States
12:27and China.
12:28While they present themselves
12:29as rivals offering
12:30different paths,
12:31for Africa,
12:32they increasingly represent
12:34two heads of the same dragon.
12:36Both view the continent
12:37through the lens
12:38of their own strategic needs
12:39and both are driving
12:40a renewed frantic scramble
12:42for the continent's resources.
12:44The Rise of China
12:45In the decades
12:46following the end
12:47of the Cold War,
12:48as the United States
12:49and Europe adopted
12:50an attitude of benign neglect
12:52toward much of Africa,
12:53China saw an opportunity.
12:55With breathtaking speed,
12:57it moved to fill the vacuum,
12:58becoming Africa's largest
13:00bilateral trading partner.
13:02The numbers tell a story
13:03of a seismic shift
13:04in global power.
13:05In 2003,
13:07only 18 African countries
13:08traded more with China
13:10than with the United States.
13:11By 2023,
13:13that number had skyrocketed
13:15to 52 out of 54 nations,
13:17a staggering 97% of the continent.
13:19China's strategy
13:20has been anchored
13:21by its Belt and Road Initiative,
13:24BRI,
13:25a colossal global development plan
13:27involving massive investment
13:28in infrastructure.
13:30Across Africa,
13:31Chinese firms
13:32have built highways,
13:34ports,
13:34railways,
13:35and government buildings.
13:36In 2020,
13:38Chinese companies
13:39were responsible
13:39for 31%
13:40of all large infrastructure projects
13:43in Africa,
13:44while Western firms,
13:45which had dominated
13:46with 85% of the market
13:48in 1990,
13:49saw their share plummet
13:50to just 12%.
13:52But this development
13:53has come at a price.
13:54These projects
13:55are often financed
13:56by loans
13:57that give China leverage
13:58and are explicitly tied
14:00to gaining access
14:00to Africa's resources.
14:02For example,
14:03a $5 billion loan
14:05to the Democratic Republic
14:06of Congo
14:07for infrastructure
14:07was secured
14:08in exchange
14:09for access
14:09to the nation's
14:10vast treasure trove
14:11of cobalt and copper,
14:13minerals essential
14:13for China's own
14:14technological
14:15and green energy ambitions.
14:17The U.S. response,
14:19a transactional counter-offensive.
14:21Awakening late
14:22to the scale
14:23of China's influence,
14:24the United States
14:25is now scrambling
14:26to counter it.
14:27The Trump administration's
14:29approach
14:29represents a sharp break
14:31from the past,
14:32discarding the rhetoric
14:33of aid
14:34and democracy promotion
14:35for an unapologetically
14:36transactional strategy
14:38that prioritizes
14:39prosperity and power.
14:41This is a pivot
14:42to a deal-making approach
14:44that explicitly seeks
14:45to compete with China
14:46on its own terms
14:47but with the aggressive
14:48branding of America First.
14:50This new American strategy
14:52is not about offering
14:53a fundamentally different
14:55model of development
14:55for Africa.
14:57It is about securing
14:58its own access
14:59to the same resources
15:00China covets.
15:01The primary goal
15:02is to challenge
15:02China's dominance
15:03over the supply chains
15:05for critical minerals
15:06which are vital
15:07for American industry
15:08and defense.
15:10Every diplomatic move
15:11every investment promise
15:12is calculated
15:13to advance this objective.
15:16Caught in the middle
15:17The result is that
15:18African nations
15:19are caught in the crossfire
15:21of this new Cold War.
15:22They are being treated
15:23as pawns in a global game,
15:25pressured to choose sides
15:26in a tug-of-war
15:27between two giants.
15:29Aligning with China
15:30can bring massive
15:31infrastructure investment
15:32but also risks
15:33debt traps
15:34and resource dependency.
15:36Aligning with the United States
15:37under its new
15:38transactional policy
15:39means facing threats
15:41of punitive tariffs
15:42for engaging
15:42with BRICS-aligned nations
15:44while being offered
15:45partnerships
15:46that are transparently
15:47focused on resource extraction.
15:49This competition,
15:50while framed as a choice
15:51for Africa,
15:52is creating
15:53a dangerous convergence.
15:55Both superpowers,
15:56despite their ideological
15:57differences,
15:58are pushing Africa
15:59back into its historical role
16:01as a simple provider
16:03of raw materials.
16:04The competition
16:05is not over
16:06how to best foster
16:07genuine,
16:08sustainable,
16:09and sovereign
16:09African development.
16:11It is over
16:11who gets to control
16:12the mines.
16:13This dynamic threatens
16:14to deepen Africa's dependency
16:16and makes the continent
16:18vulnerable
16:18to the most dangerous
16:19outcome of all,
16:21becoming a theater
16:22for proxy conflicts
16:23where the US and China
16:25back opposing
16:26political factions,
16:27tearing nations apart
16:28from within
16:29for the sake
16:30of external interests.
16:32Section 4
16:32Deconstructing
16:34the America First
16:35Gambit
16:36To understand
16:37the new scramble,
16:38one must forensically
16:39dissect the America First
16:41strategy toward Africa.
16:43The White House summit
16:44with five African leaders
16:45was not a random
16:46diplomatic event.
16:48It was a masterclass
16:49in this new approach.
16:50Every element,
16:51the guest list,
16:52the exclusions,
16:53the policy announcements
16:54that surrounded it,
16:55was a carefully calibrated move
16:57in a larger game
16:58of coercive diplomacy
16:59designed to secure
17:01American access
17:01to Africa's mineral wealth.
17:044.1
17:05The Strategy
17:06of the Handpicked Summit
17:07Targeting the
17:09Low-Hanging Fruit
17:10The choice of attendees
17:12for the Washington summit
17:13was the first
17:14and most revealing clue
17:16to the strategy.
17:17The leaders of Gabon,
17:19Guinea-Bissau,
17:20Liberia,
17:21Mauritania
17:21and Senegal
17:22were invited.
17:23Africa's economic powerhouses
17:25Nigeria,
17:26South Africa,
17:27Egypt
17:28were conspicuously absent.
17:30Why these five?
17:31Because they are
17:32what one analyst
17:33aptly called
17:33low-hanging fruit.
17:35These are not
17:36the continent's giants.
17:37They are smaller,
17:38more politically
17:39and economically
17:40vulnerable nations,
17:41making them more susceptible
17:42to the kind of
17:43transactional
17:44win-win partnership
17:45where the scales
17:46are heavily tipped
17:47in America's favor.
17:49Yet,
17:49they are titanically rich
17:51in the specific resources
17:52the U.S.
17:52is desperate to secure.
17:54The table below
17:55reveals the stark
17:56strategic logic.
17:56These five nations
17:58are treasure troves
17:59of manganese,
18:00iron ore,
18:01bauxite,
18:02uranium,
18:03phosphates
18:04and the rare earth elements
18:05that are the lifeblood
18:07of the 21st century economy,
18:09powering everything
18:10from electric vehicle batteries
18:12to advanced defense systems.
18:14Their geography
18:14is as important
18:15as their geology.
18:17All five nations
18:18have strategic coastlines
18:19on the Atlantic Ocean,
18:21crucial for shipping resources
18:22to the West
18:23and for projecting power
18:24to counter the growing
18:25naval presence
18:26of China and Russia
18:27in the region.
18:28The invitation to Guinea-Bissau,
18:30a nation with almost
18:31no trade with the U.S.
18:32and no American embassy,
18:34is particularly telling.
18:35Its inclusion
18:36only makes sense
18:37when you see
18:38its untapped bauxite
18:39and phosphate deposits
18:40and its recent security
18:41overtures to Russia,
18:43which the U.S.
18:44seeks to disrupt.
18:464.2
18:46The rationale of exclusion,
18:49punishing
18:49the BRICS alliance.
18:51The exclusion of
18:52Africa's major economies
18:54was as deliberate
18:55as the inclusion
18:56of the chosen five.
18:57Nigeria,
18:58South Africa,
18:59Egypt,
19:00and Ethiopia
19:00were not just overlooked.
19:02They were sent a message.
19:03These nations
19:04are the pillars
19:05of Africa's engagement
19:06with the BRICS bloc,
19:07the group of emerging economies
19:09founded by America's
19:10chief adversaries,
19:11China and Russia.
19:13The Trump administration
19:14has been explicit
19:15in its hostility
19:16toward this emerging alternative
19:17to the Western-led global order.
19:19It has threatened
19:20to impose punitive tariffs
19:21on any country
19:23that aligns with
19:24what it deems
19:24the anti-American policies
19:26of BRICS.
19:27The summit's guest list
19:28was a practical application
19:30of this threat.
19:31It drew a clear line
19:32in the sand.
19:33Partnership with America
19:35is conditional.
19:36The price of admission
19:37is the rejection
19:38of a multipolar world.
19:40It is a classic
19:41divide-and-conquer strategy
19:42designed to isolate
19:44and punish
19:45the continent's
19:45most powerful
19:46and independent voices,
19:48making it easier
19:49to impose its will
19:50on the more vulnerable.
19:524.3
19:53The Weaponization of Policy,
19:55Trade,
19:56Aid,
19:56and Immigration
19:57The America First strategy
19:59is a three-pronged assault
20:01that weaponizes
20:02every tool of statecraft.
20:04The official slogan
20:05is a shift
20:06from aid to trade,
20:07a phrase that sounds
20:08pragmatic and empowering,
20:10but this is
20:11a profound deception.
20:12The centerpiece
20:13of this strategy
20:14is the dissolution
20:15of the U.S. Agency
20:16for International Development,
20:18USAID,
20:20framed as a move
20:21to cut waste,
20:22fraud, and abuse.
20:23The real purpose
20:24is far more sinister.
20:26The shutdown of USAID
20:28rips a hole
20:29in the social fabric
20:30of the continent,
20:31eliminating billions
20:32of dollars in funding
20:33for critical programs
20:34in health care,
20:35education,
20:36agriculture,
20:37and political stability.
20:39The consequences
20:40are catastrophic
20:41and immediate.
20:42Projections show
20:43that the aid cuts
20:44could push nearly
20:456 million more Africans
20:46into extreme poverty
20:47in the next year alone
20:48and create power vacuums
20:50in fragile states
20:51that extremist groups
20:52are already beginning
20:53to fill.
20:54This is not
20:55an unintended consequence.
20:57It is the core
20:57of the strategy.
20:59This manufactured crisis
21:00is a tool of coercion.
21:02By deliberately
21:03weakening African states
21:04and making their people
21:05more desperate,
21:06the U.S. creates
21:07the conditions
21:08where exploitative
21:09mineral-for-investment deals
21:11can be presented
21:12as a lifeline.
21:13It is a brutal logic.
21:14First,
21:15remove the safety net
21:16of aid,
21:17then extend a hand
21:18offering a partnership
21:19that requires signing away
21:21the nation's future wealth.
21:23This is the
21:24carrot-and-stick approach
21:25in its most cynical form.
21:27The U.S. is burning
21:28the village
21:29and then offering
21:30to sell the fire hoses.
21:32To complete
21:32this coercive framework,
21:34immigration policy
21:35is used as another
21:36lever of control.
21:38At the very moment
21:39the administration claims
21:40it wants these nations
21:41as commercial partners,
21:42it is also threatening them
21:44with travel bans
21:45and tightening visa restrictions.
21:47Senegal,
21:48Gabon,
21:49and Mauritania
21:50are all on a list
21:51of countries
21:51being considered
21:52for such bans.
21:53This sends a clear,
21:55deeply insulting message.
21:57We want your resources,
21:58but we do not want
21:59your people.
22:00It strips away
22:01any pretense
22:02of an equal partnership
22:03and reveals
22:04the raw,
22:05transactional,
22:05and neo-colonial heart
22:07of the
22:07America First agenda.
22:08Section 5.
22:10Case Studies
22:11in Submission
22:12and Resistance
22:12In this new scramble,
22:14two distinct paths
22:15are emerging
22:16for African nations.
22:17They represent
22:18a fundamental choice
22:19between submission
22:20to the neo-colonial framework
22:22in exchange
22:22for conditional stability
22:23and a high-stakes bid
22:25for true sovereignty
22:26that risks
22:27chaos and isolation.
22:28The U.S.
22:29broker deal
22:30in the Congo
22:30and the defiant posture
22:32of the Sahel states
22:33are the living case studies
22:34of this continental crossroads.
22:365.1 The Congo-Rowanda
22:38Peace Accord
22:39A Template for Submission
22:41and Extraction
22:42On the surface,
22:43the agreement signed
22:44between the Democratic Republic
22:45of Congo,
22:46DRC,
22:47and Rwanda
22:48is presented
22:49as a diplomatic triumph.
22:51A U.S. brokered
22:52peace deal
22:52to end decades
22:53of horrific conflict
22:55in Africa's
22:55Great Lakes region.
22:57This is the official story.
22:58The unwritten verdict,
23:00however,
23:00reveals a different truth.
23:02This deal
23:02is the quintessential template
23:04for the America First
23:05resource strategy.
23:06The true motive
23:07was laid bare
23:08by President Trump himself,
23:09who boasted to reporters
23:11that the accord
23:12allows the United States
23:13to get
23:13a lot of the mineral rights
23:15from the Congo.
23:16The text of the agreement
23:17confirms this,
23:19explicitly linking
23:20the peace process
23:20to the development
23:21of regional critical
23:23mineral supply chains.
23:24The entire framework
23:25is designed
23:26to de-risk the region
23:28for Western investors,
23:29creating a secure corridor
23:30to extract the DRC's
23:32globally significant reserves
23:34of cobalt,
23:34copper,
23:35and coltan,
23:36minerals over which
23:37China has established
23:38a dominant position.
23:39This peace for minerals
23:41model is a dangerous gamble.
23:43It prioritizes the interests
23:45of foreign corporations
23:46and geopolitical strategy
23:48over the complex realities
23:51on the ground.
23:52The deal largely ignores
23:54the true root causes
23:55of the conflict,
23:56which include deep
23:57historical grievances,
23:59bitter disputes
24:00over land and citizenship,
24:02and the presence
24:03of over 100 different
24:04armed groups
24:05who have their own interests
24:07in continuing the violence.
24:10By focusing on extraction,
24:12the deal risks
24:13creating a superficial peace
24:16that benefits a handful
24:17of elites and foreign companies,
24:20while the underlying tensions
24:21that have fueled
24:23generations of bloodshed
24:24are left to fester.
24:27It is a model of submission
24:28where stability is purchased
24:30at the price of sovereignty
24:32and peace is contingent
24:34on the steady flow
24:35of minerals to the west.
24:385.2
24:39The Sahelian Resistance
24:41A new path forward?
24:43In stark contrast
24:44to the path of submission,
24:46a block of nations
24:48in the Sahel
24:48is charting
24:49a radical course
24:50of resistance.
24:52The military-led governments
24:53of Mali
24:54under Asimi Goita
24:56alongside Burkina Faso
24:58and Niger
24:59have made a definitive
25:01and historic break
25:02with the neo-colonial order
25:04that has dominated
25:06their existence
25:06since independence.
25:09Their first move
25:10was to sever
25:11the umbilical cord
25:12to their former
25:13colonial master,
25:14France.
25:15They have systematically
25:17expelled French troops
25:19and demanded
25:20the withdrawal
25:21of the UN peacekeeping mission,
25:24viewing these forces
25:25not as protectors,
25:27but as instruments
25:28of foreign control.
25:29This was not merely
25:31a diplomatic spat.
25:33It was a profound rejection
25:35of the entire
25:36post-colonial security
25:37architecture.
25:39In its place,
25:40they have forged
25:41a new independent alliance,
25:43the Alliance of Sahel States,
25:46AES.
25:47Their simultaneous withdrawal
25:48from the western-aligned
25:50regional bloc,
25:51ECOWAS,
25:52underscored their commitment
25:53to building a new political
25:55and security framework
25:57free from external influence.
25:59A key pillar
26:00of this resistance strategy
26:02is a strategic pivot
26:04toward new partners,
26:06most notably Russia.
26:08This is more than just
26:09a search for weapons
26:10and military advisors.
26:12It is a geopolitical
26:13declaration of independence
26:15from the western sphere
26:17of influence.
26:18This path has come
26:19at a cost
26:20to western-style democracy.
26:22In Mali,
26:23Asimi Goita
26:23has moved
26:24to consolidate power,
26:26securing a renewable
26:27five-year presidential term
26:29without the need
26:30for elections.
26:31From a western perspective,
26:33this is authoritarianism.
26:35From the perspective
26:36of the Sahelian resistance,
26:39it is a necessary step
26:40to ensure
26:41the long-term stability
26:42of their anti-neo-colonial
26:44foreign policy.
26:46It represents
26:46a conscious choice,
26:48the pursuit
26:49of absolute sovereignty,
26:51even if it means
26:52sacrificing the model
26:53of governance
26:54promoted
26:55by the very powers
26:56they seek to escape.
26:58This is the path
26:59of resistance,
27:00dangerous,
27:01uncertain,
27:01but rooted
27:02in a powerful demand
27:03for self-determination.
27:05Section 6,
27:07The Spiritual Battlefield,
27:09A Call to Awakening.
27:11The evidence
27:11has been presented,
27:13the patterns
27:13have been revealed,
27:15the unwritten verdict
27:16is now clear
27:17for all to see.
27:19The shadows
27:19of the 19th century
27:21scramble for Africa
27:22loom long
27:23over the 21st.
27:25The treaties
27:25have new names,
27:27they are called
27:28bilateral investment agreements,
27:30regional economic frameworks
27:32and peace accords.
27:34The empires fly new flags,
27:36but the objective
27:37is timeless.
27:38The systematic extraction
27:40of Africa's immense wealth
27:42for the benefit
27:43and enrichment
27:44of external powers.
27:46This is the moment
27:47of truth
27:48for the people of Africa.
27:50Understand that
27:51this is not merely
27:52a struggle
27:52over economics
27:53and politics,
27:55over mines
27:55and trade deals.
27:57This is a spiritual battle
27:58for the soul
27:59of a continent.
28:01It is a fight
28:02to the death
28:02against the
28:03neocolonial identity crisis
28:05that has been engineered
28:07to foster dependency
28:09and self-doubt.
28:11It is a struggle
28:12to reclaim
28:13the African agency,
28:15the African pride,
28:17and the African
28:18self-determination
28:19that was stolen
28:20centuries ago
28:21and has been suppressed
28:23ever since.
28:24The choice facing
28:25every African nation,
28:27every African leader,
28:28and every African citizen
28:29is now stark.
28:32The path of submission
28:33represented by the
28:35hand-picked leaders
28:36at the Washington summit
28:37and the mineral-centric deal
28:40in the Congo
28:40offers the illusion
28:42of partnership.
28:43It promises
28:44conditional stability
28:46and a seat
28:47at the table,
28:48but the price
28:49is the perpetuation
28:50of dependency,
28:52the acceptance
28:52of a junior role
28:54in a system
28:55designed
28:55by and for others.
28:57Then there is
28:58the path
28:59of resistance,
29:00the path
29:01being carved out
29:02in the Sahel.
29:03It is a path
29:04fraught with danger,
29:05instability,
29:07and international
29:08condemnation,
29:08but it holds
29:10the promise
29:10of something
29:11far more valuable,
29:13true sovereignty.
29:14It is a declaration
29:15that Africa
29:16will no longer
29:17be a pawn
29:18in the geopolitical
29:19games of others.
29:20This is a call
29:21to awakening.
29:22It is a call
29:23to the people
29:24of Africa,
29:25from Dakar
29:25to Nairobi,
29:26from Cairo
29:27to Cape Town,
29:28to see through
29:29the hollow rhetoric
29:30of investment
29:31and partnership.
29:33It is a call
29:34to recognize
29:34the historical patterns
29:36of deception
29:37and control
29:38that are playing
29:38out once again.
29:40It is a call
29:41to demand
29:41a new future,
29:43one defined
29:43not by external powers,
29:46but by the will
29:47of the African people
29:48themselves.
29:49The time has come
29:50for a pan-African unity
29:52that transcends
29:54the artificial borders
29:55drawn in Berlin,
29:56a unity of purpose
29:58strong enough
29:59to refuse the role
30:00of a chessboard
30:01for the US-China rivalry.
30:04Africa's greatest resource
30:05is not the cobalt
30:07in its soil,
30:08the diamonds
30:09in its mines,
30:10or the oil
30:11off its coasts.
30:13Africa's greatest
30:14and most powerful resource
30:16is the awakened consciousness
30:17of its one billion people.
30:20The future is unwritten.
30:22It is yours to claim.
30:26This is unwritten verdict.
30:29The story was never told.
30:32The time is eran
30:34áşt주린 miten
30:36of Chile,
30:37where in traveled
30:38and me
30:39it was nothing
30:40ofYES
30:40over the paamus
30:41and the
30:42and the
30:42and the
30:43and the
30:43the
30:44and the
30:46and the
30:47of the
30:47and the
30:48and the
30:49and the
30:49and the
30:50and the
30:50and the
30:51and the
30:51direct
30:52over the
30:52air
30:53in the
30:54and the
30:54use of
30:56image
30:57of the
30:57place.
Recommended
5:14
|
Up next
1:05
1:05
1:08
1:30
1:33
1:00
1:35
1:28
0:56
Be the first to comment