Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 months ago
At a House Rules Committee hearing on Monday, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) asked a panel about how Congress can simplify internal processes in the U.S. Military.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00I want to make just one quick comment about what you've said about incremental reform
00:13on procurement.
00:15I've been here several years and have worked on this issue of procurement and trying to
00:20do something about it.
00:22And I hope and pray that what you're doing in this bill is really going to make a big
00:27change in procurement because we're wasting billions of dollars every year in this area.
00:35I don't want to cut defense.
00:36I want the way we spend money for defense to be spent well.
00:42And I really am going to be watching this issue closely because I think it's really
00:48critical to our overall national security issue.
00:56Chairman Rogers, we expect a robust amendment panel, so I will keep my comments very brief.
01:04You both talked about the 65th consecutive year that Congress has advanced the NDAA through
01:13to enactment if we're successful.
01:15To what do you attribute this year's successful bipartisanship on your committee?
01:22We keep the focus on the warfighter and making sure we give them what they need to be successful
01:27and safe.
01:28And that is our focus.
01:29It always has been.
01:30We still have our robust debates around some small measure of issues, but generally the focus
01:38is where it should be, and that's our national security.
01:41Right.
01:42And you've alluded to the fact there's an array of national security threats spread across
01:50an unprecedented global landscape.
01:52Nobody can pick up a newspaper where they don't read about China, Russia, Iran, North Korea threatening
02:01this country.
02:03So I'll come back to my concern about changing the procurement system and say, how are we going
02:15to quickly and efficiently calibrate our weapons systems, platforms, and other assets to win
02:24on the battlefields of the future and what's embedded in the SPEED Act that's going to help us do that?
02:30You'll remember last year we made the focus of the bill, the primary focus, quality of life.
02:36And this year it was the acquisition and procurement process, and that's because I'm a big believer
02:41that if everything's your priority, nothing's your priority.
02:46Last year it was trying to improve the quality of life of our service members.
02:49This year we have got to get after this problem with procurement and acquisition.
02:53It is far too cumbersome, which makes it expensive and antiquated by the time it happens.
03:00So as you heard the ranking member, we went into great detail on trying to abbreviate that.
03:06In a nutshell, what we've done is we're trying to make the department function in a more commercial
03:11fashion.
03:12Let me give you an example.
03:14Right now it can take years for us to put together a set of requirements that we expect
03:21vendors to try and meet.
03:24By making them so detailed and cumbersome and broad, only the primes can participate.
03:30There are a world of midsize and small companies that cannot hit that target.
03:36We're getting away from that.
03:37One of the things that we do is instead of giving this detailed requirements, we're giving
03:42a problem, saying this is the problem we need a solution for, and inviting the private sector
03:48to give us solutions to that problem.
03:50That is going to abbreviate that dilemma of several years down to a matter of weeks.
03:56But then from that point forward, a decision has to be made on which of those solutions that
04:01are offered will be made in a matter of 90 days.
04:05We go on through the process by expediting, empowering acquisition professionals, and
04:11expecting them to make a difference.
04:13The way I like to characterize it is, you heard the ranking member say, we have worked on this
04:17for years.
04:18We've given them all kinds of authorities to go faster.
04:21They won't use them.
04:23This year, we're telling them what they have to do.
04:25And we're giving them time limits to force the function of going faster.
04:30And it goes to the point that the ranking member made.
04:33We are going to be using high-tech weapons systems in the future.
04:37We have got to have the technology world involved.
04:41They will never be willing to function at this glacial pace and this cumbersome process
04:46we've had in the past.
04:48We're trying to fix the system so it accommodates this fast-moving technology.
04:52Can I emphasize just one point on that, the requirements process?
04:55Simplifying the requirements process is the key.
04:57I remember I was visiting a shipyard where they were refurbishing a littoral combat ship,
05:03which could get us into a whole other conversation.
05:06But they were talking about, and I talked to one of the workers there, and they were repainting
05:11the portion of the ship that's under the water.
05:13And he told me that there were 1,200 pages of requirements for how to, and I don't doubt
05:18that it's more complicated than, I don't know, repainting your bathroom.
05:22But it shouldn't have that many pages of requirements.
05:25The requirements process has become a thing in and of itself, where they just sit around
05:30and come up with requirements, which if that's what you do, that's what you can do.
05:34But it has tied the hands of our ability to make the changes we need rapidly.
05:38It's going to be focused, as the chairman said, on outcomes.
05:41Here's what we want.
05:42And that makes sense, because by putting out all the requirements and telling people
05:51how to do it, it assumes that people in the military or doing the procurement have all
05:58the answers.
05:59That's right.
06:00When you have millions of other people out there who are working on this, maybe in a much
06:05more up-to-date way, able to provide a much more efficient way to do it.
06:11So I applaud you on that.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended