Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 4 days ago
Tarun Basu speaks with C Uday Bhaskar on Tianjin summitry and its signaling | SAM Conversation
Transcript
00:00Hello, and welcome to SAM Conversation, the video program of South Asia Monitor.
00:17I am Tarun Basu, and I'll be in conversation today with Commodore Uday Bhaskar, India's
00:26preeminent strategic analyst, and since we are largely focused on South Asia and the
00:33Indo-Pacific, the most important and seminal geopolitical event this week has been the
00:42SCO, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Summit in the eastern Chinese port city of
00:50Tiangin.
00:52The organization has grown in strength.
00:56It was started as, I think, half a dozen countries, and I think on Tengen there were
01:02about 20 global leaders in attendance, including heads of government of Russia, heads of state
01:10and government of Russia, China, of course, the host, India, Turkey, and Central Asian countries,
01:20and Pakistan, of course, is also part of this grouping.
01:25The optics from the summit, as far as India is concerned, has been fairly positive.
01:31The summit has sent a lot of signals to a lot of world capitals that have, I think, followed
01:41the summit, and the message is coming from it quite keenly.
01:45Prime Minister Modi has been seen in animated conversation with President Xi Jinping, whom we met after five
01:56years, or seven years, I think.
01:59And the first time that the two were meeting after the borders clashes in eastern Ladakh in 2020, they had met, I mean, I think four months ago in Kazan, but this was a much more structured meeting.
02:16And in fact, as some media were recording the number of times they met, I think this is the 20th meeting between Prime Minister Modi and President Xi Jinping, since
02:32Mr. Modi came to power in 2014.
02:35The two were seen broadly smiling when they met, Xi Jinping, in his remarks, talked about that the two countries should be partners, not rivals.
02:50Mr. Modi talked about that the 2.8 billion people of both countries were looking to work together, and that cooperation would be important for the future of the two countries.
03:05And this future of Asia.
03:08Then there was this famous photograph, which was, again, pictured around the world, of Mr. Modi, in conversation, animated conversation with President Putin of Russia, and President Xi Jinping, and it led to a lot of talk of our RIC access, Russia, India, China access, talking about optics.
03:35Now, President Putin gave a ride to Prime Minister Modi in his limo, this spook for not just 15 minutes in the ride from the hotel to the summit venue, but also stayed on in the car for another 45-50 minutes to have a one-on-one conversation, which was, again, of great importance.
04:01Now, what are the messages that this conversations and the larger summit gave to the outside world?
04:10And here, Udaya, I would like to bring you in, to give us a larger perspective, especially what happened to India and the Trump tariffs and the 50% tariffs in India, and the kind of signaling that Tianjin has given to Washington and other world captives.
04:29Thanks, Udaya, thanks, Udaya, thanks, Udaya, for inviting me to be part of this conversation.
04:36And as you have indicated in your very comprehensive overview, the Tianjin Summit, the SCO, Shanghai Cooperation Organization, is indeed a very consequential summit in terms of the geopolitical implications and signaling, the word that you used.
04:58And I would characterize it as being very rich in the symbolism at two levels.
05:05One, of course, is the bilateral between India and China, where Prime Minister Modi had a one-on-one with President Xi Jinping.
05:15And we saw the statement, definitely from the Indian side, was very upbeat and optimistic about what you might call as the beginning of a thaw in the India-China bilateral, which had gone into the freeze after Galwan in mid-2020.
05:36So that's almost five years.
05:39Yes, Prime Minister Modi and President Xi Jinping met on the sidelines in Kazan, Russia, at the previous summit.
05:47But that was a very short meeting, very brief meeting.
05:50But in a way, it paved the way.
05:52Kazan paved the way for Tianjin, where the agreements that had been identified broadly when the Chinese Foreign Minister, Mr. Wang Yi,
06:03came to Delhi in the end of August, those have been formalized.
06:08So in many ways, I would describe the first bilateral between India and China as significant, rich in terms of the potential it holds for both countries to be able to work together.
06:23As of now, I'd be a bit cautious and just say that what it has led to is an improvement,
06:28so that the relationship that had been stored, a dialogue that had been stored, has now been brought back on track.
06:38Because there are a number of contentious issues that India and China have to address.
06:42The starting point is Galwan.
06:44I mean, what was Galwan?
06:45Galwan was a manifestation of this very complex territorial and border dispute.
06:50So now it's back, at least on the dialogue table.
06:52So that, I would say, is the first, you know, big takeaway at the bilateral level.
06:59The second, I would say, relates to the larger multilateral, which is what the SCO was all about, which China was hosting.
07:08It was a very big event for President Xi Jinping personally, against the backdrop of both the Ukraine war
07:16and the kind of pressure that U.S. President Donald Trump is seeking to apply on China also,
07:23as far as tariffs and the relationship with Russia are concerned.
07:27So I would describe it as rich in symbolism at two levels.
07:33There's a lot that we can unpack in terms of what President Xi Jinping said in his opening remarks
07:38and what President Putin said, what Prime Minister Modi said, in terms of the content of the SCO itself.
07:44Tarun?
07:44Tarun, talking about the bilaterals first, can we say this is leading to a reset in relationship between India and China?
07:56I mean, the two sides have agreed to relax their relationship in a number of ways.
08:02The visas are being resumed.
08:04The flights are being resumed.
08:07And China is, I think, lifting its export restrictions on some critical items for India.
08:13The rare earth magnets, fertilizers, boring equipment for tunnels, etc., which India needed badly.
08:25But, you know, there have been critical voices in the Indian media because of the way that things have been worded.
08:34Not too many months ago, you would remember, Foreign Minister Jaishankar talked about the centrality of the border issue
08:42and said that unless the border issue was settled, the things between India and China cannot go back to normal.
08:51But now what we read, what we have seen from the statements so far, is that the border issue, if I might put it that way, has not been settled.
09:02There has been some pullback of troops, but there has been no de-escalation.
09:12There's no de-escalation.
09:16And both sides have agreed that the border issues are still much there.
09:21But China would like to keep it to the back burner, which has always been saying,
09:26and said and wanted that the other issues, the resumption of ties and the normalization
09:32and development of ties should not be held hostage to the border issue.
09:39But India would always wanted to make the border issue, the centrality of the border issue,
09:45and said that ties cannot be normalized until the border was settled.
09:49Do you think here India has kind of puffed on this issue because of the larger geopolitical churns that are happening,
09:58especially the push and pulls from Washington?
10:02Yeah, I think that would be a fair description that the word I would choose for describing the outcome of the bilateral
10:11between Modi and Xi Jinping would be a case of restoring a degree of normalcy in the bilateral.
10:19Because the bilateral got ruptured in Galwan in 2020.
10:26And all the kind of, shall we say, breakdown that takes place in the bilateral is in that period
10:31from Galwan to Tianjin.
10:35Post Tianjin, what we are seeing is number one, the resumption of dialogue,
10:40which was preceded by the two foreign ministers, Vangi and Yashankar,
10:45as also Ajit Goval and Vangi both wearing the hat of the special representative
10:50to discuss the border issue.
10:52So, I am repeating this, it is the resumption or a restoration of a degree of normalcy.
10:59But on this second part, I agree with you, India has always said,
11:02Jayashankar has said this many times,
11:04that we want a restoration of the status quo that prevailed before Galwan.
11:10All the reading that I have done, the Indian statement is a single statement by India.
11:17There was no joint statement after the bilateral meeting.
11:20And rightly so, because this was not a summit.
11:22This was a meeting on the sidelines.
11:25But the readout from Beijing is a little more circumspect.
11:30It's a little more, I would say, you know, doesn't give the meeting the kind of optics
11:35that we in India seem to have done, particularly some sections of the audio-visual media.
11:42I would say as an analyst, and I have been accused in the past of being cynical,
11:48being jaundiced and not joining the cheerleaders.
11:51But I think we have to proceed very cautiously and see how the disengagement that we have seen
11:58at Galwan will actually lead to substantive de-escalation
12:04and pull back.
12:06And will India have the same patrolling rights that it did before Galwan?
12:12As of now, I don't get that sense.
12:15Because if you remember, even after Kazan,
12:19India was very upbeat that, you know, there was some kind of a movement.
12:23But the buffer zones were introduced.
12:25So all that has happened as I see it is that the temperature,
12:29the military temperature tension or the eyeball to eyeball between the troops has been brought down.
12:36But whether or not India is actually able to return to pre-Galwan in terms of the patrolling
12:42and the status quo, at this point, you know, the perhaps most polite way of describing it
12:48is that it's a work in progress.
12:50So we have to see.
12:51But definitely, I think India has been more malleable in wanting to reach out.
12:56I dare say, even though the Chinese side, President Xi Jinping,
12:59wanted a successful SEO summit.
13:02Imagine if Mr. Modi, Prime Minister, had not gone.
13:05That would not have been the right optics.
13:07So I think China also had a lot of investment at the political and diplomatic level.
13:12Now look at, I mean, yesterday I saw the international media.
13:15Most of them were leading, particularly TV news, with the SEO summit.
13:20So that just shows that it has the potential to be an alternative
13:24to what President Donald Trump is trying to, in a way, advance
13:29as his vision of the global order, which also means the weaponization of tariffs.
13:36In fact, the American media has paid a lot of attention to this summit.
13:41And most of the TV channels and newspapers have given a lot of coverage
13:47to the meetings between Modi and Xi, and between Modi, Putin, and Xi Jinping,
13:56and talked about how Trump has driven Modi into Chinese arms.
14:04But really, is that the case, do you think?
14:07Or it has been more about the fact that India also needed more,
14:14for economic reasons than political, to have some kind of rapprochement with China.
14:19And this was going to happen.
14:21Some kind of stabilization was going to take place.
14:25Disengagement in Galwan had happened.
14:29But although there's no de-escalation on the table,
14:32but this was going to happen anyway.
14:35So is it what has happened in Tianjin, is it because of Trump,
14:43or there's a process that has been accelerated possibly by Trump and his tariffs?
14:49Well, again, I think I would describe it in the following manner,
14:53that the beginning of an improvement in the India-China bilateral, to my mind,
15:00began in Kazan, which is last year, 2024, where Xi and Modi met on the sidelines.
15:08Then, I think from then to now, 2024 to 2025,
15:12we saw President Trump entering the White House for his second term.
15:16And the steady kind of intimidation of India and other countries,
15:21where President Trump was using the tariffs as a weapon.
15:24And I think specific to India, the brief India-Pakistan war,
15:30and the fact that India did not accept the Trump formulation that he had,
15:35in a way, been responsible for, quote-unquote,
15:38stopping the war and therefore he should be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.
15:43India did not sign up to that as enthusiastically as Pakistan did.
15:46So, in a way, you see the introduction of the personal element, Pateek.
15:51And because of that, I think the improvement in the Sino-Indian relationship,
15:57India-China, was definitely catalyzed.
16:00So, I think it would be wrong to suggest that the improvement has happened only because of Trump.
16:06But perhaps...
16:06It might have got accelerated.
16:07The process might have got accelerated.
16:09But this does not mean that India is now going to, again, the word you used,
16:14will India embrace China?
16:15I think the answer is no.
16:17Will India sever its relations with America?
16:20The answer is no.
16:21Because if you go back to the starting point,
16:24India was buying oil from Russia because it was in India's national interest.
16:30Today, India's national interest is best served
16:32by remaining in contact with the United States as India has.
16:38You know, we still have a dialogue going on on defense,
16:41on technology, on the non-tariff trade.
16:44Because America is a very important interlocutor for India.
16:49And I keep saying this, that there is life after Trump for the bilateral relationship.
16:54Many Americans are saying that there is life for America after Trump.
16:58So, I think the domestic discord in America also is a major factor.
17:02But for now, my reading is India is going to open a dialogue with China.
17:08We are not embracing China.
17:10India is going to deal with America in a way where it will draw its own red lines.
17:15But this does not mean severing relations with the United States.
17:19Though Trump, mind you, is doing everything he can to make life tough for India,
17:25the fact that he has announced 60,000 visas for Chinese students
17:32in just one kind of decision,
17:35and the impact will be on the Indian students
17:38who would not get the visa that will now go to the Chinese.
17:41So, you know, these are the kind of, I would say,
17:43pinpricks that India would have to deal with
17:47for the next three years, three and a half years,
17:50until Mr. Trump is in the White House.
17:53But given the fact that the American media
17:57gave a lot of attention to the Tianjin summit,
18:01and the fact that a lot of them panned President Trump
18:05for the way he treated India, a fellow democracy,
18:10and trying to rupture, and having ruptured a relationship
18:14that had taken 25 years in the making
18:17and at the level it stands today,
18:22do you think there would be a,
18:24Trump would have some rethink on the way
18:28the whole thing has developed
18:31and the way he has treated India?
18:33If not, I mean, President, Prime Minister Modi himself?
18:37At this point, I think President Trump
18:40doesn't have enough of an incentive
18:42to revisit and review,
18:45because, you know, logic and the conduct
18:47of bilateral relations in a normative sense
18:50doesn't seem to be his USP.
18:54He's a deal maker.
18:55So he's looking for some deal
18:57that would also burnish his image
19:00in the domestic constituency.
19:03For instance, the last time I saw a program
19:04about him, he was taking a lot of credit
19:08for making the NATO countries
19:10increase their defense budget
19:11and buy American arms.
19:14This was in relation to the war in Ukraine.
19:16He was seeing this as a big win.
19:18But I think what could cause
19:21or, you know, trigger the difference
19:22and make him review his policies
19:24is if the American consumer
19:27is hit by the tariff war,
19:31because this tariff war is not just India.
19:33India and Brazil are at 50%,
19:35but he has also identified American allies,
19:39including Japan,
19:41including Western European countries
19:42like Germany and France and Britain and so on.
19:45And similarly, you know,
19:46countries like South Korea, Australia,
19:48so-called allies.
19:49So when the American consumer
19:52starts feeling the pinch,
19:54suppose prices go up,
19:56there was a scare that if Canada decides
19:58that it will not play ball with America,
20:01then basic products will also be affected.
20:03I think when that happens,
20:05we will see it politically in the elections
20:07to the House of Representatives.
20:11Because after all,
20:11both for Mr. Modi and for Mr. Trump,
20:13it's about domestic politics.
20:16Whatever they are doing
20:17will be to ensure that their own base
20:20and their electoral,
20:22shall we say,
20:22positioning is positive for them.
20:24So my reading is that
20:26I think Mr. Trump will revisit
20:28if there is an impact on his own profile.
20:32And the American consumer
20:33and the American citizen
20:34says enough is enough
20:35and that we need to have
20:37a more rational policy.
20:39You spoke about Japan.
20:40The road to Tianjin
20:43for India
20:44was to Tokyo
20:46because Prime Minister Modi
20:47made an official visit to Japan
20:50before he came to Tianjin,
20:53before he came to China.
20:54And there were a number of important
20:56economic and security-related agreements there.
21:00And that also sent a lot of signaling
21:02because in the context of Quad,
21:05because the reports have come from Washington
21:07that President Trump may not attend
21:09the Quad Summit
21:10was scheduled to be held
21:11in New Delhi later this year.
21:13So if President Trump gives it a miss
21:15and there has been,
21:18there's a good understanding
21:21between India, Australia and Japan.
21:24And do you think there's a possibility
21:26that at least the three
21:27of the other countries,
21:29Australia, Japan and India
21:30could still meet in New Delhi
21:32in order to send a signal
21:34to Washington
21:35that the Quad is still alive,
21:38maybe as a triad
21:39and maybe in U.S.,
21:42Washington needs to review its policies
21:44because both Australia and Japan
21:47have strong relationships with U.S.
21:51You know, there are two points here, Tarun.
21:52I think, number one, you're spot on.
21:55The bilateral meeting
21:56between India and Japan,
21:58May Prime Minister Modi
21:59had met with his Japanese counterpart,
22:01I think was a very important meeting
22:03in terms of the signal
22:05it sent to China.
22:07Because the foundation for India and Japan
22:10is that they have always been concerned
22:13that China wants a unipolar Asia.
22:17China does not want,
22:19in my view,
22:20the emergence of either Japan or India
22:23or Japan and India
22:25as credible poles in Asia.
22:28China is seeking
22:30quote-unquote democracy
22:32at the global level
22:33where they want to be treated
22:34on par with the United States
22:36and have a G2.
22:38But in Asia,
22:39they want unipolarity.
22:40But at the global level,
22:41they want bipolarity,
22:43which is fine.
22:43This is the Chinese preference
22:45or Chinese,
22:46shall we say,
22:46way of looking at the world.
22:48So I think India and Japan
22:49are deeply aware of that.
22:51If you remember
22:52then Prime Minister Shinzo Abe,
22:54when he had started
22:55the whole Indo-Pacific
22:56and the connectivity of the oceans,
22:59was a shared anxiety about China,
23:01which then morphed into the Quad.
23:04But at this point in time,
23:05I think President Trump
23:07is unlikely to come to India
23:08personally for the Quad.
23:10So that will be,
23:11I think,
23:11a very tepid affair.
23:12It will not be the Quad.
23:13But again,
23:14neither would Japan or Australia
23:16antagonize Trump
23:17because they know
23:18that he gets very hazard
23:20on personal issues.
23:23So if he sees that
23:24as an affront to him,
23:25I think neither
23:26the Australian Prime Minister
23:27nor the Japanese Prime Minister
23:29want to go down that path.
23:31They,
23:31I think,
23:32would try to keep it
23:33very, very low level
23:34in terms of the engagement
23:35with India.
23:36But this does not remove
23:38the challenge
23:39for the United States
23:40that China poses
23:42in the maritime
23:43and naval domain,
23:44which is why I keep saying
23:45that there is life
23:46after Trump.
23:48China is not going to disappear.
23:50The Chinese Navy
23:50will become even more formidable.
23:53We will have the whole impact
23:54of artificial intelligence
23:56and new technology
23:57on the global maritime domain
23:59in space
24:00and cyber.
24:01And that is when I think
24:02the tea leaves
24:03as far as global geopolitics
24:05and Asian geopolitics
24:06are concerned
24:07will have to be seen
24:09very, very carefully.
24:10You spoke about the fact
24:14that, you know,
24:15being the host country,
24:17China and President Xi Jinping
24:19want to naturally
24:20to make the Tianjin summit
24:22a success.
24:24And also in terms
24:26of takeaways for India,
24:29there was a joint,
24:32in the joint declaration,
24:33there was a mention
24:34of the
24:34Pahalgaon terror attack
24:37and there was
24:38all-round
24:39unanimous condemnation
24:40of the
24:41Pahalgaon terror attack,
24:43which was not there,
24:44if you remember,
24:45four months ago
24:45in the defense minister's meeting,
24:47which led to
24:48defense minister
24:49Rajanath Singh
24:49not being a signatory
24:51to the final declaration.
24:53So there was
24:54a softening of strength.
24:56There was a kind of,
24:56or rather to use your word,
24:58malleability
24:58on the part of China
24:59in terms of
25:01bringing in
25:02Pahalgaon,
25:02agreeing to the Indian
25:03formulation
25:03on the condemnation
25:05of the Pahalgaon terror attack.
25:06But at the same time,
25:08there was also mention
25:09of the Jaffa Express
25:10train attack,
25:12which again,
25:13you know,
25:13as you know,
25:14Pakistan has eluded
25:15that there is a foreign
25:17hand in it
25:18and
25:18products said
25:20that India
25:21could have been,
25:22you know,
25:22also involved.
25:24So the fact that
25:25both Pahalgaon
25:26and Jaffa Express
25:27in terms of
25:28terror
25:29and
25:31battle against
25:32terror is concerned
25:33that they were brought,
25:35both brought into
25:36the final declaration.
25:37What does that signify?
25:39Well,
25:39basically,
25:39I would say in summary
25:40that it's a kind of
25:41balancing act
25:42for Beijing also.
25:43Because as we said,
25:45for Beijing,
25:45it was important
25:46that Prime Minister Modi
25:47be at the summit.
25:49But while he was there,
25:51I think Pakistan
25:52also had to be accommodated.
25:55So I think
25:55this final language,
25:57you know,
25:57I was reading
25:58some reports
25:58from China
25:59also that
26:00some Chinese
26:01reports seem
26:03to suggest
26:03that India
26:04played very hard ball.
26:05And finally,
26:06there was a lot
26:07of brinkmanship
26:07to arrive
26:09at a language
26:10that would be
26:11acceptable
26:11to Beijing,
26:12to Delhi
26:13and Rawalpindi.
26:15Because remember,
26:16it's General Munir
26:17and Rawalpindi
26:18who have become
26:19the most relevant
26:20player.
26:21He also happens
26:22to have come
26:23to Beijing
26:24and on the
26:25Chinese
26:25Communist Party
26:27invitation
26:27for the military
26:28parade,
26:28Grand Military
26:29Parade.
26:30So I think
26:31for India,
26:31it was a limited
26:33kind of,
26:33I would say,
26:34advancement
26:35of the Indian
26:36position.
26:37Because Pakistan
26:38was not identified
26:39as supporting
26:40terrorism,
26:41which is what
26:41India has long
26:42maintained.
26:43So I think
26:43Beijing has found
26:44some kind of
26:45a modest
26:46vivendi,
26:46which is why,
26:47you know,
26:47where we started,
26:48I said that
26:49we have to
26:50only cautiously
26:50welcome
26:51the takeaways
26:52from Tiyanjal.
26:55So how would
26:56you sum up
26:57the whole summit
26:58and the fact
26:59that both
27:02India
27:02Prime Minister
27:04Modi
27:04had very
27:05successful meetings
27:06or what was
27:06seen to be
27:07very successful
27:07meetings
27:08with his
27:09Chinese,
27:10with his
27:11Russian,
27:13with his
27:13Turkish
27:13and other
27:14counterparts.
27:15So what is
27:16the outlook
27:17for South
27:18Asia and
27:19for Indo-Pacific
27:20post the
27:21SCO summit
27:22in Tianjin?
27:24You know,
27:24my sort of
27:25conclusion would
27:26be that
27:26Tianjin
27:27is to be
27:28cautiously
27:29welcomed,
27:30both for the
27:31improvement
27:31in the
27:32bilateral
27:32and for the
27:34broader
27:34signal being
27:35sent by the
27:36global community
27:37represented in
27:38this case by
27:38China as the
27:39host country,
27:41that there are
27:41voices outside
27:42which are not
27:44going to accept
27:44the kind of
27:46intimidation that
27:47President Trump
27:48is currently
27:48engaging in
27:49because at the
27:50end of the
27:50day the
27:51SCO represents
27:53almost 42%
27:54of global
27:55population and
27:56about 24%
27:57of global
27:58GDP.
27:59So it's a
28:00voice that I
28:01think is being
28:02heard and
28:03tomorrow is the
28:04parade,
28:04September 3rd
28:06and there my
28:07sense is that
28:07China will
28:09again display
28:10its military
28:10muscle,
28:12President Xi
28:13will have
28:13President Putin,
28:14the Russian
28:14president with
28:15him as also
28:16the North
28:16Korean leader,
28:17perhaps Iran
28:18etc.
28:18would also be
28:19given a
28:19place.
28:20So I think
28:20you can see
28:21the emergence
28:22of the
28:24equivalent of
28:25a cluster of
28:26leaders whose
28:27orientation is
28:28anti-US and
28:30India does not
28:31want to be in
28:32that particular
28:32basket which is
28:33why I am
28:33repeating this,
28:34India will not
28:35sever relations
28:36with America
28:37nor will it
28:38embrace China
28:39in an uncritical
28:41manner is my
28:41reading of the
28:42answer.
28:42But India
28:44can certainly
28:44play the role
28:45of a
28:45balancer as
28:46some analysts
28:47have predicted.
28:48India has
28:49good terms
28:50obviously and
28:51India is not
28:51going to rupture
28:52its relationship
28:53with the US
28:53in any way and
28:54I am sure
28:55back channel
28:56talks are
28:56already on and
28:58India has good
28:58relations with
28:59everybody and
28:59the message that
29:00India has sent
29:01to the world
29:02that it is not
29:04a zero-sum game
29:05and that good
29:07relations with
29:08China, good
29:09relations with
29:09Russia, good
29:10relations with the
29:10US, good
29:11relations with
29:11EU are all
29:13in India's
29:13national interest
29:14and India has
29:15the strategic
29:16autonomy to
29:16decide what
29:17is in its
29:18national interest
29:18and what is
29:19not and no
29:20country has the
29:21right to decide
29:21leave alone the
29:23US about who
29:24it should
29:25cup with and
29:26who it should
29:26trade with.
29:28Am I correct?
29:29Yeah, absolutely.
29:30I think that
29:30would be a very
29:31appropriate summary.
29:33Well, that
29:35was nice
29:35having you
29:36there and
29:37I think
29:37thank you
29:38and thank you
29:40on behalf of
29:41South Asia
29:41money.

Recommended