BYD Shark vs GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV: ULTIMATE off-road and towing comparison review!

CarExpert

It's time to put these two plug-in hybrid utes up against each other in the ultimate gruelling comparison. This is the 2026 BYD Shark 6 up against the 2026 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV.  Hardness tester, noise and lane keeping results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/121Auf6HGvaBqRToYcuAz94alin7Sw55SpOPECBDlnKE  Skip Ahead: Intro: 00:00 Overview: 00:31 Interior: 02:32 Load capacity: 04:19 Acceleration: 05:55 Off-road: 08:02 Towing test: 12:44 Trailer dyne test: 15:16 Verdict: 20:46  We review every new car on the market, bust car myths, cover the latest car tech and answer your burning questions.  Whether you need new car advice, purchase validation or simply love learning more about new cars and technology, we are your car experts.  Subscribe to Car Expert: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7DvMhvy3H7ntEgn9n3xQcQ?sub_confirmation=1  You'll find us dropping new video content three times a week. If you'd like to ask a question about one of our videos, simply leave us a comment. If you'd like to give us any feedback on our content, feel free to email us, or alternatively, hit us up on social media.  Finally, we want this channel to grow with your support and feedback. If there's anything you don't like or would like to see us change, we'd love to hear from you!  Follow us on social media to see what we're up to and to ask any questions!  CarExpert: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CarExpertAus Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/CarExpertAus Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/carexpert.com.au  Paul Maric: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PaulMaric Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/PaulMaric Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/PaulMaric  #byd #gwm #comparison

Transcript

00:00G'day, I'm Paul. So the plug-in hybrid dual-cab ute segment is heating up before the Ford Ranger

00:05arrives. These are the two options you have to pick from the GWM Canon Alpha plug-in hybrid and

00:10the BYD Shark. We're going to do a bit of a comparison. I want to figure out which of these

00:14two is best. We're going to do all of the big tests that we do with these normally and the

00:19tests that the Shark didn't quite do so well at last time. This time around though, it is a

00:23production version of the car. So if you do want to skip ahead to other parts of this video,

00:26you've got time codes on the screen, or if you're on YouTube, you can scroll down and

00:30use the chapters below. But let's kick off with just high-level overview. What are these things?

00:34So BYD Shark was first to launch and it's priced at just under $60,000 plus on-road costs. It is

00:41incredible value for money. They sold a stack of these early because people were basically

00:46jumping on this for an FBT exemption if you do a novated lease. So they sold heaps of them. That

00:50has now expired though. 1st of April, that was over. So you can't do that anymore. You have to

00:54just buy it outright effectively. There is no FBT exemption. Under the bonnet here,

00:58one and a half litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine, two electric motors, one on the

01:03front axle, one on the rear axle. There are a very narrow band of speeds where the internal

01:07combustion engine is directly driving the front wheels. The balance of the time, it's a battery

01:12that is driving those wheels plus the addition of the internal combustion motor as required through

01:18the electric motors. So it means that it's pretty quick, under six seconds, zero to 100. In fact,

01:22we've done a drag race with my Raptor. If you do want to see how that went, there is a link in the

01:26description below. Over on the other side, the Canon Alpha. This is priced from just under $64,000

01:31drive away. So if you do drive away costs on this, it's about a $2,000 difference. This here is the

01:36top spec version though. So this gets a front diff lock, a rear diff lock. It also has a bigger

01:40engine than the Shark. So two litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine. It also uses a very

01:45different drivetrain. So this uses effectively the same drivetrain you would find in the internal

01:50combustion version of this, except there is an electric motor sandwich between the transmission

01:55and the internal combustion engine. That means it has a low range transfer case. It has diff locks.

02:00It has all the standard stuff you'd expect to find in a vehicle like this. It also has a much bigger

02:03battery, 37.1 kilowatt hours versus around 30 kilowatt hours in the Shark. You get more driving range and

02:09both of them will charge with DC charging and AC charging as well. So that is your high level specs.

02:15I do want to figure out which one is nicer to drive, which one performs better against our

02:20gruelling dyne test and which one is able to climb our very simple hill, but the hill that the Shark

02:27couldn't climb last time. So now that it is a production car, we're going to give this another

02:31crack and we'll see how we go. So we're back in the studio. I thought we'll do the rest of the video

02:34from here, overlay some of the testing that we've done to give you the results. We're going to kick off

02:39with the interiors. Now this is kind of interesting because both of these vehicles, certainly at the

02:44entry level, are within cooey of each other when it comes to their pricing. Features though, they're

02:51kind of separate and you do expect a little bit of a difference there given that the Canon Alpha

02:55is more expensive. So when you do step up to that top spec, we're talking about stuff like massage

02:59seats, you've got front and rear diff locks, like it's got a fair bit of equipment. But in terms of the

03:04sitting in the interior itself, both of them feel really nice and premium. And I can't overstate

03:10enough how much value for money you're getting here. Whether you do go down the path of the

03:14Canon Alpha or the BYD Shark, if you have a look at $60,000 for either of these at their base levels

03:20and you look at what you would get if you were paying for a Hilux or a D-Max or a Ranger,

03:24none of those feel anywhere near as nice or luxurious as these cars. And you can see this is exactly why

03:29people are buying them. So from that point of view, it's good. Both have inbuilt satellite navigation,

03:34smartphone mirroring, so you're getting that full complement of features. I do like in the second

03:38row of the Canon though, you can actually kind of recline the seats and have a bit of a relax there.

03:43The only downside to that is you can't store anything under the seats like you can with the Shark,

03:47but the Shark is slightly compromised by having some of those electrical components underneath the

03:51seat. We did find as well with the Shark, when we had a look at our pre-production car, that it did have

03:56some dust ingress in there when they were doing the launch testing. So it does mean that there is

04:01probably not the best ceiling there in terms of gravel roads and the type of driving you might

04:05do if you're out in the country. But for the most part, both have excellent second row legroom,

04:10and that is important in this segment because again, some of the earlier dual cab units like

04:14Hilux, which is on a really dated platform at the moment, feels quite cramped in the second row.

04:19Now in terms of capacities, this is kind of where there is a bit of a difference between these two.

04:23So curb weight in the Canon Alpha is about 100 kilos more. So you've got a few factors at play here.

04:29You've got a bigger battery, around 30 kilowatt hours versus 37. So that is going to weigh a

04:33little bit more. Difference as well is that the Canon Alpha uses an NCM battery, so a nickel-based

04:38battery, whereas the Shark uses an LFP battery. So less energy dense, you're getting better energy

04:43density out of the Canon's battery. So it's not going to add that much extra weight, but it will

04:47potentially be slightly heavier. You also have a traditional drivetrain, so that comes with stuff

04:52like a transfer case, diff locks, differentials themselves. So there is a little bit of a difference

04:57there that adds to that weight. They have been able to get that extra tonne of towing capacity

05:01thanks to a higher GCM. So you are able to actually tow an extra tonne when it comes to a brake trailer

05:07with the Canon, but it is kind of let down by its payload. So 685 kilo payload with Canon compared to

05:13almost 800 kilos with the Shark. So straight out of the bag there, the Shark with its independent rear

05:18suspension is able to get slightly better payload. Obviously, once you put a three and a half tonne load on

05:23the back of the Canon Alpha, you are then compromised by your GVM and you only really have

05:29a couple of hundred kilos to work with, plus a little bit more when it comes to the vehicle

05:33being fully loaded. So just worth keeping that in mind. Don't look squarely at numbers and go,

05:38that one's better than the other. When you do look at them side by side, they are fairly similar with

05:42the Shark obviously not having that peak towing capacity, but I'd be more concerned about the Shark

05:47with its peak towing capacity when it comes to actually towing heavy loads, which we'll get to shortly,

05:52and that is thanks to being a much smaller engine in terms of capacity. Acceleration. This is the one

05:58everyone is talking about. It seems like they engineered the Shark with over 300 kilowatts of

06:03power for the sole reason of being the fastest sort of mid-sized dual cab ute on the market.

06:10When we drag raced against my Ranger Raptor, it bet the Ranger Raptor several times. So I think that

06:16they really just gave it enough power to achieve that. Canon Alpha is much slower in comparison. So

06:21where the Shark will do 0 to 100 in about six seconds, slightly less. Canon Alpha takes over

06:26seven seconds to do it. We'll caveat that by saying that when we did test the Canon Alpha,

06:30the battery was quite low. We unfortunately didn't get a chance to charge it to give it another run

06:35with 0 to 100 time. We're driving a pre-production car. So we do hope to get that back as a production

06:40vehicle to see how quick it is. Definitely feels fast behind the wheel. You've got a lot of torque as well.

06:45I mean, we're talking about 750 newton metres of torque combined from that two litre turbo plus the

06:51electric motor. So pretty decent, healthy capacity. So I'm confident we can probably get a little bit

06:56quicker, but whether it would actually match or beat the Shark, I don't think so. And you'll probably

07:01get that out of your mind if you think that's going to be happening anytime soon. Where it did beat

07:05the Shark though was accelerating with our TrailerDyne. And we'll get to the more holistic TrailerDyne

07:11section shortly and talk about how we do that testing. But when we did actually have the

07:16TrailerDyne set to three kilonewton and accelerated from zero to 100, the Canon Alpha actually bet the

07:22Shark all the way through to 100 kilometres an hour. Now we do understand that the Shark recently had

07:27updates to its towing mode that actually pulled out a lot of power. And I think that is for

07:32preservation of battery based on our initial testing where the vehicle had a lot of shortcomings

07:37when it came to towing. It looks like they've done some software updates that have taken out a bit

07:41of the power there, the peak power to give you longer distance drivability through that one and

07:45a half litre. And that has come at the cost of zero to 100 acceleration when you are towing. So

07:50something worth keeping in mind, not the end of the world, but it does show that Canon Alpha when it is

07:54loaded up is actually more useful as a vehicle in terms of acceleration and pulling loads than the

08:00Shark is, which kind of makes sense when you have a look at the overall numbers. So before we jump to

08:03the towing stuff, let's talk about off-road. Now this is unfortunately where it all falls apart for the

08:09BYD Shark. And really we've tested this enough times now to really, I guess, understand that the

08:15setup that the car is running isn't conducive to off-road driving. And let's just start off with

08:20with what the core issue is. When we tested the original BYD Shark, it was a pre-production car.

08:25It didn't have production software. As a result of that, you know, we thought that perhaps it was the

08:30software that was a limiting issue. We thought it might also be torque because it doesn't have

08:34a set of reduction gears on the electric motors. So it means that you only do have one amount of

08:39torque available. It doesn't really give you an ability to step down and multiply torque like you

08:44would find in a traditional internal combustion car. And as a result of that, you just get these

08:48flurries of wheels slip that have to be controlled by traction control. And it looks like the traction

08:54control just can't do a good enough job of managing those bursts of torque. And as a result of that,

08:59it will get on a hill and it'll just sit there. The wheels will rotate slowly and nothing will

09:04happen. And after we did our original testing, BYD, to their credit, actually came back to the hill

09:10that we test on and sent a video of a production or modified version of the Shark with newer production

09:17firmware testing on that hill. And it managed to get up the hill. Unfortunately, though, they didn't

09:22mention, and they may not have known this, that the hill was regraded and basically flattened out prior

09:27to their arrival. So when they did do the testing, it wasn't the same hill that we test on. It was in

09:32fact a very highly attractive surface that was quite easy to get up in any car, including the BYD

09:39Shark. So when they sent that video to the Shark owners group and demonstrated the car going up the

09:43hill, everyone was clapping their hands. But unfortunately, it still can't make it up the hill.

09:47As we discovered when we tested the production version, I literally went through every single

09:52combination in hybrid mode, EV mode, every single off-road mode. I tried it with stability control

09:58off, tried it without the off-road modes active. Overnight, when we had the car, I also then applied

10:04a software update that claimed to improve off-road performance. And we then tested everything one more

10:10time the following day. From what I could tell, there was a slight improvement, but it still didn't

10:14make it up the hill. But it did update some of the names of the off-road modes. They were previously

10:19like sandy land and mountain land, whereas now they just sand, mountain, etc. So BYD still has

10:25some work to do there. And I think a lot of this can be solved with a reduction gear. And if you

10:30have a look at cars like the Porsche Taycan, it has a two-speed gearbox and that allows them to have

10:34flexibility when it comes to accelerating at high speeds and explosive acceleration at low speeds.

10:40BYD could, in theory, install a similar two-speed gearbox to the Shark that allows them to have

10:45a low-range set of gears to multiply torque on a hill like that, and then a high-range set of gears

10:51for acceleration at higher speeds. And I think that would actually do a great deal in helping

10:55them climb this hill. They also need a differential lock, either on the rear or the front or both.

11:00That's going to massively help as well. When it comes to wheel articulation, this doesn't have a

11:04huge amount of wheel articulation, being independent rear suspension, which means that when the tyres

11:08fall into some of these moguls, they just can't get the purchase, the traction that they need to get

11:13moving. And that would be solved with something like a rear diff lock, because it gives you the

11:17ability to have that even torque split between the rear wheels. Over with the Canon, though,

11:22completely different story. I mean, this is a vehicle that has front and rear diff locks,

11:25has a low-range transfer case. You're multiplying torque through the transmission,

11:30you're multiplying torque through the transfer case, the differentials. Like, there is a lot of

11:34avenues there for you to get much greater torque and tractability through those wheels on a hill like

11:39that. And as a result of that, we were easily able to climb the hill any time we tried. Like,

11:43it was pretty effective. It did get stuck at one point, but it was just a case of applying the

11:48diff lock and then up it went. And that was able to also do it in EV mode. That's another mode that

11:53we tested. It managed to get up there without actually running the internal combustion engine.

11:57And I think that just demonstrates to you how much easier life would be if BYD actually fitted some

12:03of that hardware to the Shark. It would really improve things. So our understanding is that BYD is

12:07working on a two-litre version of the Shark to help with towing capacity. So testing at three and a

12:12half ton with a two-litre engine. If they're going down the path of putting a two-litre engine in,

12:16hopefully they can also apply like a diff lock of some sort because they are available in electric

12:22cars. We've tested the F-150 Lightning before, and that has like an axle lock on the rear, and that

12:26is a fully electric vehicle. So hopefully they can achieve something here. But at this stage,

12:31the off-road issue still hasn't been fixed. And hopefully it is something that BYD can address

12:37with either a future software update or with changes in hardware. But the Canon definitely

12:41wins the off-road test when it comes to that stuff. Now, towing. Let's talk about towing.

12:47We'll start off first with our Hill Road. So this is where we tested both cars at their GVM. Shark

12:52with 2,500 kilos of trailer on the back, 250 kilos of thereabouts of downboard weight on the vehicle,

12:57plus also payload in the tray to get it at GVM. It did a great job. It had excellent acceleration.

13:03It really didn't feel fatigued at all. Held its battery fine. So I was pretty sort of

13:07comfortable with how it all went. Where it really sort of comes apart for the Shark, though, again,

13:12coming back to that reduction gear, when you do need to slow down, the vehicle will use regen going

13:17down big hills with the trailer on the back. Problem is, though, that the regen dips in and out. And I

13:22don't know why that is. Maybe it's a fatigue in the electric motor or the battery that is causing it to

13:27go, oh, we're doing a bit too much here. I need to release it for a moment and then come back into it.

13:31But I did find that it would dip in and out of regen on long stretches of downhill.

13:36End result of that is you're going to need to ride the brakes. And when you ride the brakes,

13:39you could potentially cook your brakes and run out of brakes for corners. So that is something that,

13:44again, a reduction gear would help because it means they can actually use engine braking and

13:48a bit more regen to slow the vehicle down. This applies to off-road, too. If you're doing a long

13:53hill descent, hill descent control will ride the brakes once it's done with regen or if you're at too

13:58lower speed. So eventually you're going to put a lot of strain on the brakes and it could cause an

14:02issue longer term. Cannon, on the other hand, on our hill road, three and a half ton in the trailer

14:06and then a couple of hundred kilos of payload plus my weight in the vehicle to reach GVM.

14:11Same story there. It felt really confident behind the wheel, nice and punchy. And this is where you're

14:15getting, I mean, 750 newton metres of torque. It's more than what you're getting out of a V6 diesel in

14:20this segment. And it really feels it behind the wheel. It confidently accelerated up our 15% grade.

14:25It just eats up the miles really nicely. Both of them ride really well with that kind of weight

14:29on as well, which I was surprised with. I didn't expect those two vehicles, given they have such

14:33a big curb weight, to ride as well as they do with those kinds of weights. There was a downside with

14:37the Cannon, though, and that is that the tow bar integration still isn't complete. The car we

14:42tested was a pre-production car and I felt that the tow bar, both the tongue and the actual tow bar

14:46assembly sits too low. So that is something that they're working on for the production vehicle,

14:51but that should be addressed by the time you can actually buy that car and buy the tow package

14:56with it. Because as it stood, it was just a little bit too low to the ground. I felt that if you hit

15:01a big enough bump with 350 kilos of downboard weight, it could actually nudge the road, which

15:06I just wasn't too happy with. So both great on the hill road with the caveat there on brakes and the

15:11shark on long descents and also the tow bar placement on the Cannon. And then over to the nasty

15:18trailer dine that caused so much angst on the internet after we posted our video of the BYD

15:26shark failing to do 100 k's an hour when the battery was expired. Now that expiry state really

15:31is an edge case. And when I say edge case, it's something you're unlikely to ever encounter,

15:37but you could encounter it. And the edge case occurs when, you know, you take your vehicle camping,

15:42like a lot of people will, you use the vehicle to load and you lower the battery to 25% or thereabouts,

15:47which is where the cutoff is for these vehicles. You're going to get to the point there where you

15:51don't really have enough charge in the battery. And unless you want to sit there for a long time

15:54and wait for the vehicle to run the internal combustion engine and charge the battery, you'll

15:58just want to hit the road and get going. Now the edge case occurs when you leave your campsite and

16:02you're straight onto a Healy road or a steep climb with a payload and a trailer on the back.

16:08And you reach the point where the battery is expired, which in the case of the shark,

16:12I think it was around 13 or 14%. When it reaches that expiry state, certainly last time,

16:16the engine was unable to keep up with a hundred Ks an hour. It would basically sit at around 75 Ks

16:22an hour, screaming, trying to just keep moving because the battery was drained. You weren't

16:27able to get any assistance from the battery. And you were left with a one and a half liter

16:30turbocharged four cylinder petrol engine that even with 135 kilowatts of peak power,

16:36it had to be within its peak power RPM band to achieve that. And it appears that at a hundred Ks an

16:41hour, it was outside of that peak band. And that is as much power as you're going to make out of

16:45that engine, which was around a hundred kilowatts. And as a result of that, it won't accelerate past

16:49that 75 odd kilometer an hour mark. So there was a lot of uproar there because a lot of people said,

16:54oh, this isn't realistic. Well, you know, it is an edge case. And I think I said that a number of

16:58times in the original video, when we sat down to do the maths, we actually did a video with John

17:02Cadogan. We sat down and did the maths and found that the hill that the trailer dyne was simulating

17:07wasn't actually that steep. It was actually around sort of three degrees or so, five or six

17:12percent grade. So really not that steep of a hill. The hill we test on at the Proving Ground is a 15

17:16percent grade. So a much steeper climb. So I think it is a realistic scenario. And I also think that

17:22this just demonstrates that the internal combustion engine isn't big enough to tailor for the vehicle's

17:28weight plus the weight of a trailer when you are at that edge case. So we did all of this testing

17:34again with our production shark with the knowledge that it has new firmware. And hopefully this would

17:39be the difference between it working and it not working. And you know what? I was actually pretty

17:44surprised by this. When we ran the edge case, yes, it did eventually get to the point where we drained

17:48the battery. And it did the same thing again, except this time we were able to travel at a higher speed

17:53around sort of 80 odd kilometers an hour. But it still wouldn't get to 100 k's an hour, even with the

17:57foot buried into the firewall. But the important thing to note is that it took much longer to get

18:04to the edge case. And they have made changes and the changes actually make a big difference. So

18:09it appears that BYD has taken out peak power. So they've really just reduced the amount of peak

18:15power you can get when you are accelerating with a trailer attached. They still have stuff like cruise

18:20control disabled, which is a little bit frustrating. But when the trailer is attached, you do notice that

18:24the peak power you're getting on the power meter is less. But the big difference is that they actually

18:29run the internal combustion engine a lot harder and a lot more often than they did with the

18:34pre-production car that we drove. With a pre-production car, we were able to run it with

18:39the internal combustion engine switched off for a lot of the time. And as a result of that, it ended up

18:43draining the battery really fast, which got us to our edge case very quickly. This time around,

18:47though, it was at 100 k's an hour with the trailer attached. It was running the engine almost at its peak

18:53and also then drawing from the battery. But it was kind of preferencing the internal combustion

18:58engine. And as a result of that, it wasn't drawing as much battery. And it took us forever

19:02to get from, you know, the state of about 70% down to the 20% mark where we started our edge case

19:09testing. But it also took a long time to get from around that 20% mark down to the 14 or so percent

19:15when the battery is expired. So what they've done here with the control strategy has actually improved

19:19the vehicle. And it means that even though when you do get to that edge case, it will still do

19:24the same thing. You can't overcome the physics of that engine being underpowered for that kind of

19:29load. But what you can see is that it's going to take such a long time to get there that it's

19:33unrealistic that you'll ever actually reach that scenario. So I sort of came away from that being a

19:39lot more confident that you could use that as a tow vehicle. And if you did manage your power

19:44properly, it would never really become an issue for you to land in that case. The Canon, on the

19:49other hand, I mean, if it took forever in the shark, it took an eternity in the Canon for us to

19:54actually drain the battery, simply because the internal combustion engine makes 180 kilowatts of

19:59power. It always had more than enough reserve capacity to actually be towing the trailer dying at

20:05three kilonewtons and towing the vehicle and keeping up at 100 k's an hour. Even when we eventually

20:11drain the battery and it took a long time to do this and got it to its expired state, the vehicle

20:17simply just stayed at 100 k's an hour. If you needed more throttle, you push the throttle a little

20:20harder. It would then kick down a gear and would just be doing 100 k's an hour. So I think that shows

20:26you the big difference there. The shark is only short by about 50 kilowatts of power, which will be

20:30fixed when they put a two litre in it. But the Canon is such an effortless vehicle with that trailer

20:36dying on the back that you don't even notice that it's there. And you're never actually reaching that

20:40edge case where the battery is expired. And even when it is expired, you are simply just towing as

20:45you normally would. So there it is, a comparison between BYD Shark and Canon Alpha plug-in hybrid.

20:54Look, two very different vehicles, in fact, when it comes to drivetrain. Canon Alpha is more expensive,

21:00but only slightly more expensive at the entry level. Once you do on-road costs for the shark,

21:05I think it was only like $1,000 or $2,000 difference between the shark and the entry level Canon Alpha.

21:09If you do go to the top spec, you've got a much bigger price difference, but you're also getting

21:13a lot more features. I think these are vehicles built for very different people. Canon Alpha is

21:18built for people who need a tow, people that need to go off-road and really just want a jack of all

21:23trades that will do all of that. Shark, on the other hand, is built probably more for city-oriented

21:28driving, people that don't really get out much and do much off-road driving, and people that don't

21:33really tow all that much. I think that if you do want to do some very light off-road driving,

21:37the shark is going to be perfectly fine. But the second it starts getting a bit more serious,

21:41it really is not suited for that kind of driving until they do fix a lot of these problems. So

21:46I think they are working on that. Hopefully they do resolve it. But if you do need to be doing

21:50off-road driving or towing, and you want to feel comfortable while you're towing,

21:55I'd be definitely going down the path of the Canon Alpha. It is the superior vehicle

21:58in pretty much every single way that we've tested here. While you do get that sort of electric vehicle

22:03driving feel in the BYD Shark, the Canon Alpha just feels like a regular vehicle,

22:07and it has the punch when you need it, and it can just do all the other stuff that you need to do

22:11with the dual-cab ute. So of the two, I give the win to the Canon Alpha, I guess, unanimously when

22:17it comes to all of these tests. It is just better in every way. But I think if BYD fixes the Shark

22:23with a two-liter, maybe adds a diff lock, reduction gear, they're going to have a serious battle on their

22:28hands, especially if they can maintain pricing position. Because at that price, if you're willing to

22:33compromise and all that stuff, it is incredible value for money. I still feel when you drive it

22:37that it is just really good value for money. So do you agree with the result? Have you driven both

22:42of these? What did you think? Are you a Shark owner? Are you happy with how it's going so far? Let me

22:47know in the comments section below. If you did enjoy the video, please make sure you like it and you

22:50share it with your mates. And if you haven't done it already, subscribe to the channel and press the

22:53bell icon. But until next time, drive safely.

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended