Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 2 days ago
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing in July, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) asked Columbia Law Professor Julian Ku about China's rules around Third Party Litigation Funding, a practice where an interested party not involved in a lawsuit can fund one of the litigants.
Transcript
00:00Thanks very much. I yield back.
00:02Would the gentleman yield?
00:03Happy to.
00:04So what you're saying is they might not be too concerned
00:07if we actually had our reciprocity match their reciprocity
00:10or they would be outraged, as they often are.
00:14Well, I mean, they could be outraged,
00:17but they wouldn't have any reasonable basis to be outraged.
00:19I think the rule would be not just the United States,
00:21but other, not just China.
00:23Most countries in the world have a reciprocity requirement.
00:25Yeah. We use Rule 26 for disclosure by the defendants
00:32of their third-party funding, if you will,
00:35of their defense and or payment.
00:37In China, do they have a similar rule,
00:40and does it require the plaintiff to also disclose?
00:45I'm not familiar with that specific rule in China.
00:47I do know that there have been disputes,
00:49and it's uncertain court judgments have...
00:52some Chinese courts have disallowed third-party litigation funding
00:56for the agreements that have been disclosed,
00:59but I'm not sure that disclosures are acquired
01:01under Chinese court system.
01:03But I do know that Chinese courts,
01:05some Chinese courts have refused to allow people to proceed
01:08if they had a third-party litigation agreement.
01:10Okay, so they're just outright prohibited.
01:12Well, there's no general rule,
01:14but I know courts in China have ruled that it is inappropriate
01:18or not allowed or prohibited in this case.
01:23And seeing no one else on your side for now,
01:26we now go to the gentleman from South Carolina.

Recommended