Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3 months ago
During a House Oversight Committee hearing in July, Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX) spoke about federal contract bid protest reforms.
Transcript
00:00I recognize myself for the purpose of making an opening statement and this is
00:06important today that we have gathered together and we have three important
00:10witnesses who will help guide this committee on what I believe is should be
00:15a regular process as part of the success to ensure that the American people put
00:21trust in the federal government to spend their taxpayer dollars wisely and as we
00:27need to continue our oversight to ensure not only that but also that we listen
00:33to professionals who deal with these issues to provide us status in fiscal
00:39year 2024 the federal government spent about 755 billion dollars on goods and
00:47services through the contracting process and while there is significant focus on
00:53what federal agencies bought we need to focus also on that process and how they
00:59do so part of the contracting process includes the mechanisms known as a bid
01:05protest that serves to ensure government procurements are competitive and fair I
01:10believe this is an important goal so it is incumbent upon the subcommittee this
01:15subcommittee government operations and the federal workforce to review the bid
01:20process as part of our regular oversight and indeed we have looked at this
01:27process we've learned that there are feedback concerns and feedback that need
01:32must be reviewed to determine whether changes to our system are in order critics
01:39of the current process say that the bid protests have become ingrained in the
01:43solicitation and the award process with companies factoring in a protest as soon as the contract
01:52is announced other critics say that contracting officers are more concerned with
01:57creating the best paper record to defend their decisions rather than achieving the best results
02:04for the federal government and the United States taxpayer supporters of the process who want reforms say
02:12that delays are due to bureaucratic red tape at the procuring agency either the agency is too slow
02:19in developing requirements or too slow to implement corrective actions while there are potentially a
02:26number of problems in need of solution it appears to me that the process may be overutilized this makes it
02:34difficult for agencies to get the goods or services that they need reducing their ability to timely
02:41deliver on their mission I am aware of a variety of these issues that need to be considered
02:48so is it too easy to protest can we maintain fairness while requiring more stringent stringent
02:55criteria be met before a complaint can be filed are there too many bites at the apple for those who protest
03:03timeframes are involved in that if a party does not like the results they get are they bogging down
03:11the system by relitigating what they really wanted in the first place are there additional steps that
03:19can be taken before solicitation and issues which would prevent protests once an award is made should we adopt a
03:28loser pays approach and how would this work it seems to me that this and other solutions could reduce
03:37and limit serial protesters who lodge a protest because they have nothing to lose that is why we are here
03:45today we're here today to ask three people who are deeply involved in this process and have a vast background
03:54who are able to help guide not only this subcommittee but I believe members of congress to where we
04:00understand more about the process that we ask questions about as we examine this bid protest as in the case with
04:09many other issues ranking member Mfume and I want to investigate we need to ensure that we have the right
04:16information to make good decisions that with your guidance will help us and I am concerned we do not have
04:26those available to us until today we have a lot of things that that are stories we have a lot of things
04:33where people say things perhaps there's even a viewpoint about with an unsolicited amount of creative information
04:42or information from those who are involved in the process who have opinions but these insights are all
04:49important and if we begin that story today with people who are in the know who can guide us it's helpful
04:57the trump administration is committed to reforms and here in this subcommittee we're going to listen to that
05:04venue we believe the vehicle to do that is by an open hearing one that is not just matched with republicans
05:12and democrats but good government people and that is what we believe we have on the side of republicans
05:19and our friends that are democrats who are here today who serve on this government operations subcommittee
05:26we want to make sure that we are approaching problems issues and ideas thoughtfully so today we'll
05:33hear from distinguished subject matter experts who are in the field who understand the problem who know
05:39that ultimately we want to make sure that we are reviewing this to be thoughtful about what we are
05:45doing so with that said i would now yield to the ranking member or uh his designee which in this case
05:52would be mrs norton mrs norton
06:02you
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended