Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 6 weeks ago
During a House Energy Committee hearing before the Congressional Recess, Rep. Neal Dunn (R-FL) asked Chief of the Organ Transplant Branch at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Dr. Raymond Lynch about TOPIC.
Transcript
00:00When yields, the chair recognizes the gentleman from Florida, Dr. Dunn, for his five minutes of questioning.
00:05Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, and I want to thank you for holding this important hearing.
00:11While I was practicing as a physician, I performed organ donation surgeries and transplants,
00:18and drawing on my experience, I was shocked when reviewing the reports for this hearing.
00:23They're deeply disturbing.
00:24Transplant services depend on the generous donors, and they must have 100% trust in us in all things on these donations.
00:37I was horrified by the findings and commit to working to ensure that these stories do not repeat.
00:43Dr. Lynch, I do want to first commend you for your work with HRSA while compiling this investigation.
00:50Based on your testimony, I must say it seems that there was an effort by others to downplay the facts.
00:59HRSA didn't let that happen, and I thank you for that.
01:03Has HRSA been made aware of additional patient failures like those outlined in these reports?
01:14I'd like to acknowledge the Division of Transplant and the HRSA and the Secretary as a whole.
01:20This is a team sport, and this has been one in which I believe everybody shares the goals
01:25and has shared the work in generating reports like this.
01:28We are aware of other instances, and in fact, as we conducted our review of the OPO in question here in Kentucky,
01:37even after the September event that they were made aware of in this hearing and after their merger with another OPO,
01:47subsequent reporting came to us from individuals within the community identifying cases of concern.
01:52We did substantiate cases of concern in that time period, even during that era.
01:57I trust HRSA will investigate those as well, and I appreciate your attention to these important investigations
02:06and reestablish the public trust in all of us.
02:10I remain concerned that the OPO responsible for the particular blatant failures we read about here today
02:17continues to operate, even if under a new name.
02:20And I believe that the HHS should consider all options to protect patients,
02:26including considering decertifying OPOs with a record of failure in this regard.
02:32Finally, perhaps HRSA or the OPOs, whoever's in charge of making a CMS who makes these rules,
02:40should consider demanding the use of standard protocols for brain death.
02:46We always used brain death, not circulatory death, when I was in practice.
02:52In all cases of drug overdose, that seems to be the most common type of patient.
02:59He gets confused in these situations with circulatory death, yes or no.
03:05And they're much more difficult people to, or patients, to understand.
03:10Is that a fair consideration?
03:12The determination of brain death really does require a rigorous evaluation.
03:18And a layman's way of describing it is that nothing is wrong with the brain except that it's not working.
03:23The brain should be warm.
03:24The person can't be hypothermic.
03:26They can't be without oxygen.
03:27They can't have too low a blood pressure.
03:29That would make your or my brain not work well.
03:31And they can't be medicated or paralyzed so that we're not getting an accurate assessment of that.
03:37Those things are well described in, you know, consensus guidelines that are used as the basis for many state laws.
03:44And they are knowable.
03:47Well, that was always the standard that we applied.
03:50And I have to say this circulatory death standard is, seems to be, I think, confusing the issue.
03:58So I urge you to revisit that.
04:02And with that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended