Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 7 weeks ago
During a House Energy Committee hearing before the Congressional Recess, Rep. John Joyce (R-PA) asked Chief of the Organ Transplant Branch at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Dr. Raymond Lynch about when organ procurement processes should be immediately stopped in a hospital.
Transcript
00:00I thank you for your testimony, and we will now move to questioning.
00:04I will begin and recognize myself for five minutes.
00:09Dr. Lynch, to better understand what occurred with the index case
00:13and how a DCD, or donation after cardiac or circulatory death,
00:18how a case like that works,
00:20is it fair to say that it is not a failure in a DCD case
00:25if the patient doesn't end up dying in the allotted time
00:28and the process is during the procuring of the organs if it is stopped?
00:36It's fair to say that the OPO has a duty to look for donors.
00:41The prognosis, meaning planning whether or not an individual will expire within a time period
00:48that would allow for the recovery of their organs, is imprecise.
00:52So in good faith cases, there will be instances where a patient has a withdrawal of care,
00:57is allowed to progress to a natural death,
00:59but that occurs over too long of a timeline to make the organs usable.
01:02And you wouldn't consider that a failure, would you?
01:04I would not.
01:06However, it is a failure.
01:07If at any point in the process leading up to the removal of the patient from life support
01:12and declaring that patient is deceased,
01:16that the patient shows signs of improvement, neurologic function,
01:19such as signs of pain or fear,
01:23if you see a patient crying,
01:25if you see these kind of neurologic responses,
01:29the process should be immediately stopped.
01:31Do you agree?
01:33I agree.
01:33Or in another case, when a patient was awake and following commands,
01:38yet the OPO did not terminate the organ procurement process
01:43at the moment the patient exhibited that behavior.
01:46Is this how a DCD case should work?
01:49No, it is not.
01:50Why is that?
01:52So in DCD, the appropriate initial and then the subsequent evaluation is key.
01:57Identifying those individuals where the injury to the brain is sufficient
02:01that they will not recover and allowing them to progress to a natural death.
02:05If over the course of the days between the OPO's initial assessment
02:08and when they ultimately go to the operating room,
02:11if they're improving,
02:11then it is unlikely that they're going to pass in that time frame
02:15and they're being exposed unnecessarily to harm.
02:18So continued reevaluation as the process continues
02:21has to be part of the process, correct?
02:23Correct.
02:25We have seen continued reports of these concerning instances.
02:29In an instance, at times, by both OPO's and the OPTN board
02:34and its investigative arm that these cases do not represent a failure in the system.
02:40Based on your opinion as a transplant surgeon
02:44and now in your role as the chief of organ transplant brands of HRSA,
02:49can DCD continue to be done in a way that protects patient safety
02:53and honors the sacrifice of what these patients are doing?
02:57Absolutely. So this is critical to ensuring patients' ability
03:02to have their wishes fulfilled.
03:03So if you make that brave decision to be an organ donor
03:06and you can pass in a manner that you can be recovered safely as a DCD donor,
03:10you should be afforded that right.
03:12We're also relying on these organs to save the lives of other Americans.
03:15This is complex care.
03:17It's technically demanding, but it's knowable and fixable.
03:20This is something that can be done safely.
03:22As part of the investigation, HRSA analyzed information from over 350 unique cases
03:29of A&R patients or authorized not recovered.
03:33This means that the patients were considered for DCD recovery,
03:37but no organs were transplanted.
03:39The report continues that 103 of these cases, or nearly 30%, had concerning features.
03:46Could you explain what some of those features are and what the common themes are in these cases?
03:52So HRSA's report and what we documented in our corrective action plan
03:56essentially identified four problems.
03:59There was the inability to perform a good initial or subsequent neurologic exam
04:03and identify those individuals who were likely to progress.
04:07There was a poor pattern of collaboration and respect for the input from the primary medical team,
04:13the hospital providers, there was poor communication and treatment of families,
04:17and then there was poor documentation of what was actually occurring with these patients
04:21in the OPOs records.
04:24Would you say that the issues occurring in these cases are more related to policies
04:29on how the situations are handled, or personal errors, or a lack of communication from team?
04:35Because there are multiple teams that are involved as this entire process continues.
04:38So this is, as I said, this is a technically demanding form of care.
04:43It involves good collaboration between the OPO and the hospital,
04:47but every area in the country has exactly one OPO.
04:50They are the only ones who can provide this care.
04:52It is within their scope to make those relationships, do the education for the hospital,
04:57and provide that expertise and support to help them.
05:01I thank you for the clarity of your answers.
05:04I think it is important for this discussion.
05:06I now yield five minutes.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended