Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 5 months ago
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing in July, Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) spoke about Sen. Bill Cassidy's (R-LA) push to end the practice among Medicare Advantage providers known as "upcoding" when they inflate their risk assessment of the insured.
Transcript
00:00Mr. Doggett, you're recognized.
00:02Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
00:05You know, while the MA ads that are direct to consumer to seek new enrollees are usually misleading,
00:11the Medicare Advantage ads that are resisting reform are truly deceptive.
00:15A good example are those that are being run now over a million dollars' worth in the state of Louisiana
00:21against its senator, Republican Senator Dr. Cassidy,
00:25claiming that his efforts to end upcoding represent deep Medicare cuts for the people of Louisiana
00:31that will deny access to their doctors.
00:34Dr. Fiedler, can you explain why reining in waste fraud and abuse in Medicare Advantage can actually benefit all enrollees,
00:43including even those that are in MA plans, without in any way jeopardizing access to their healthcare
00:49as these false ads have been claiming against Senator Cassidy?
00:54As you mentioned, we're currently paying Medicare Advantage plans tens of billions dollars more per year
01:04than it would cost to serve the same beneficiaries in traditional Medicare.
01:09And so, if policymakers were to rationalize the MA payment system and use those funds to invest in the base Medicare benefit,
01:17that approach would obviously benefit traditional Medicare enrollees,
01:20but reinvesting the savings in those ways could benefit Medicare Advantage enrollees as well,
01:24because MA plans are required to cover the base Medicare benefit,
01:27because traditional Medicare is the competition for MA plans,
01:30and because those higher benefits would translate into higher benchmarks for MA plans.
01:34And because the MA plan is so inefficient, the MA status quo is so inefficient,
01:39depending on the circumstances and the design of that type of policy,
01:42even MA enrollees could end up better off on that than they are under the status quo.
01:48Well, thank you very much, and I'm sorry to say I hear the same kind of false ads are being run
01:52against Chairman Schweikert out in Arizona that have been used in Louisiana and elsewhere,
01:58when we could be working together to try to get the taxpayers more for their investment.
02:03Let me ask you to turn to the whole issue of risk adjustment,
02:07because after being promoted as a way to save taxpayer money and improve quality,
02:12we're still waiting to get the first cost benefits from Medicare Advantage,
02:17and in fact we've spent billions more than traditional Medicare.
02:20I have repeatedly urged CMS to rein in the abuse of upgrading,
02:26the very one that they're running these ads against people who raise that question.
02:31What are the benefits of adopting some new risk adjustment formula,
02:36such as I believe it's called DESE, that has been recommended by MedPAC.
02:40How would it impact good actors that don't engage in up coding?
02:45So I think the evidence is quite clear that CMS's existing methods
02:51for adjusting for higher coding intensity and Medicare Advantage are serious.
02:55are seriously inadequate, and that that's a big reason why payments to MA plans
02:59have ended up so much higher than intended.
03:03If CMS were to adopt a better method for adjusting for coding intensity,
03:07and I think MedPAC's and the research community's DESE method
03:12could be the foundation of a method for doing so,
03:16that would help mitigate this type of problem.
03:19I think that method could be used in one of two ways.
03:23It could be used to calculate insurer-specific adjustments,
03:26or it could be used to calculate adjustments at the market level.
03:29I think the advantage of insurer-specific adjustments is that it would only adjust coding intensity
03:35to the extent that a particular insurer plan is engaged in more intensive coding activity.
03:41I think a caveat with an insurer-specific approach is it could expand the scope for plans
03:46to engage in favorable selection.
03:48So I think there are trade-offs with these types of approaches.
03:51Finally, I'd ask you to turn to supplemental benefits.
03:54You know, when the enrollment period begins and we start seeing one ad after another on television,
04:00you get the impression you get free rent, free visits, free groceries,
04:04perhaps even a free autographed football from Joe Namath.
04:07But in fact, there are some limits on supplemental benefits.
04:13And I wonder if you could tell us a little more about your – just expand on your testimony
04:20concerning whether Medicare Advantage plans are adding significant value through these supplemental benefits,
04:26a number of which, when they relate, for example, to dental service,
04:30or the very type that some of us have been trying to get added to traditional Medicare.
04:36So I think the reality is when we're talking about particularly dental services,
04:41the coverage that MA plans are actually offering is often much more limited than, you know,
04:48what people expect to be covered under a dental plan in terms of either what services are covered
04:52or what the financial limits on the coverage are.
04:56You know, there are – MA plans do offer additional cost-sharing protections,
05:02in some cases lower premiums.
05:04But I think the issue, from my perspective,
05:06is those additional benefits aren't commensurate with the additional money we are paying those plans.
05:11And so there are probably much better ways to deliver those additional benefits to Medicare beneficiaries
05:16than the sort of bank shot through higher MA payments that we're working with today.
05:21Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
05:23Thank you. I now –
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended