Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 5 months ago
During a Foreign Affairs Committee hearing in July, Rep. Scott Perry (R-TX) asked Undersecretary of State Allison Hooker about loyalty tests for State Department staffers and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs at the Department.
Transcript
00:00The gentleman yields back. Representative Perry is recognized.
00:04Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Secretary Hooker, over here. Sorry about that.
00:09The State Department's 75,000 employees, including 13,000 Foreign Service officers and 11,000 Civil Service staff,
00:17cost taxpayers over $16 billion annually in salaries and benefits.
00:22Yet evidence suggests that many of the employees advocate socialist or communist ideologies that clash with American values
00:30or certainly any oath that any of the employees might take.
00:34A 2024 whistleblower report from the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs revealed diplomats praising collectivist policies
00:41and meeting with EU counterparts, undermining our free market stance.
00:46Are we going to continue funding a diplomatic corps that seems more aligned with Marx than Madison?
00:52And I'm serious about that. Like, what is the plan here?
00:54Does the department even recognize this as an issue?
01:00And I'm not talking about restricting the exercise of free thought or free speech,
01:06but if we're going to have people in our State Department advocating for the policies and beliefs of our adversaries,
01:14I think that's problematic. So that's a serious question to you.
01:18Thank you, Congressman, for your question.
01:22I'm just going to refer to the reorg for a moment, but it's in line with answering your question.
01:29And that is, as I've said, the reorganization is meant to bring the power over foreign policy back into the bureaus,
01:39but underneath senior bureau leadership that is aligned with this administration.
01:45And so under the leadership of not just myself, but the heads of those bureaus and, of course, Secretary Rubio,
01:55I'm confident that we'll be able to operate as a democracy
02:00and operate on these foreign policy objectives that the president has laid out.
02:05And I appreciate that. And again, we're not asking for fealty to an individual,
02:11but I think many of us are frustrated over time with the State Department that seems to be antithetical
02:16to the values of the country and the citizens it supports.
02:20And, you know, as an example here, the Department's 2022 Equity Action Plan costing $12 million last year projected
02:29at $15 million for FY26 promotes DEI initiatives that prioritize identity over merit, mirroring socialist frameworks.
02:39A 2023 internal survey showed 62 percent of foreign service officers supported policies like wealth taxes
02:47or nationalized industries that are those ideas are just rejected by by Americans.
02:54And furthermore, let's see here.
02:58Here's a true story.
02:59In 2024, a whistleblower in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor revealed a click of employees circulating a petition
03:06to soften sanctions on Cuba, citing humanitarian concerns while ignoring Havana's repression.
03:12The petition signed by 22 staff members was exposed by a Freedom of Information Act request.
03:19Again, we just prefer people that are loyal to the United States of America.
03:24I mean, Ana Montes is cool on her heels in a prison for being the most prolific operative working inside the United States of America,
03:34yet promoting Cuban communist policies.
03:38We simply can't have that, so I understand there's a reorganization going on,
03:42but if you can elucidate for us any of the policies in that reorganization that would kind of get a gauge
03:51on loyalty to the Constitution of the United States of America.
03:56For instance, do employees take an oath regarding their loyalty to the Constitution of the United States of America?
04:03Each employee of the Department of State takes an oath when they begin their service to the Constitution.
04:10I did, too, when I started on June 5th.
04:12It's the same oath.
04:13And so if employees of the State Department then advocate for the Communist Party of Cuba,
04:21is that seen as a violation, or will that be seen moving forward as a violation of that oath?
04:27Thank you, Congressman, for that question.
04:31I work every day with absolutely fabulous colleagues in the Department of State, Foreign Service, Civil Service,
04:41other staff in the Department.
04:45And I appreciate your concerns, and thank you for highlighting each of those issues.
04:50I will, you know, work with my colleagues in the Management Bureau to see how we might be able to address this.
04:57If it arises as a problem going forward.
04:59Pam, I appreciate your time.
05:00In fact, I didn't mean to cut you off, but I just want to close here before the chairman has to cut me off.
05:05We need a State Department that works in concert with the views of the Constitution of the United States of America
05:12and moves that agenda, the agenda of America, forward abroad.
05:17And we can't have employees, whether they're convicted of sedition or treason like Anna Montez was,
05:23or whether they're just expressing antithetical positions that help our enemies.
05:28We can't have them being the spokespersons and the policymakers for the United States of America.
05:36And there's got to be some repercussions for those kind of things in the Department of State.
05:40With that, I yield the balance.
05:42General.
05:42General.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended