Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3 months ago
During a Senate Appropriations Committee markup meeting in July, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) spoke about rescissions packages.
Transcript
00:00Thank you Madam Chairman and I'm glad the conversation has kind of dialed back
00:06from re-litigating the merits of what we had in front of us last night and who
00:12supports global health and who supports or who doesn't support making sure that
00:19the starving children are fed. We do need to be asking ourselves how we move
00:29forward as appropriators and I appreciate your your statement Senator
00:35McConnell about about having the ability to advance these measures to the floor
00:43that's what makes us relevant there's a lot of good work that goes on here last
00:49night for me was very personally frustrating because it was these were
00:55measures that I cared about some of you had a different view but they were
01:00matters that we had authorized and appropriated to and had been signed into
01:04law now we were dealing with them. Senator Schatz you you made one comment that
01:10struck me you said all all we need to do is to kind of help address the challenge
01:18that we're facing here as appropriators and not being relevant is we need to find
01:22for Republican appropriators to basically basically help out I would I would dispute
01:30that I think what we need to find is if if there's going to be a rescission that
01:35moves forward it needs to be a rescission that is a bipartisan rescission from the
01:42beginning one where folks in the administration have come to us and have
01:46said do you realize that this is in this this measure related to to global
01:55economic disaster or child nutrition or whatever it may be to have that
02:00conversation to have that engagement with us to shape a package that we not
02:06just we as appropriators but we as members of the Senate who under article 1
02:12have this authority of the power of the purse to say you know what that shouldn't
02:18have been in there and I'm not quite sure who was responsible for it whether it
02:21was Samantha Powers or somebody else but it shouldn't be in there and we agree and
02:24there's a process that we can follow that will not divide us into partisan camps
02:32but will actually elevate the work that goes on here in the Senate in the
02:40Congress when it comes to to the power of the purse and appropriations I will
02:46tell you I am super offended I'm not frustrated apparently that's the word
02:51you're supposed to use when you're talking to me Murkowski is always
02:53frustrated about everything today when I see when I see the OMB director say tell
03:00us challenge us you guys should be more partisan what that tells me is there are
03:08people who don't want us to be relevant who don't want us to come together and
03:14work through these issues and these problems and so I'm going to take that as a
03:19personal challenge I'm going to say no I'm going to do everything that I can to
03:24make sure that we are able to do bipartisan initiatives that we are able to
03:31actually make our process work without having the OMB director be the one that is
03:37going to quote change the paradigm of the way that we do our jobs here they can
03:43have input that's totally fine that's totally legit but we we have a trust
03:49deficit that's probably an understatement but it's up to us to to address it in a
03:58way that is befitting of the responsibility that we have when it comes to to
04:05stewards of the taxpayer dollars so we got our work to do but but to the
04:10Merkley amendment if I may I'm going to oppose it Senator Merkley and I'm going to
04:16do so because I want to respect the jurisdiction that comes with the various
04:22committees that we have and this jurisdiction as the chairman of the
04:26budget committee has noted does not lie with us it lies with the budget committee so
04:32I'm going to I'm going to be pushing you Lindsay to make sure that we don't we
04:37don't find ourselves in this situation where we are delivered a holy partisan
04:42rescission package told take it or leave it and and put us in the same situation a
04:48rerun of what we had last night that's not good for those of us that have done
04:52that and it's not good for the institution
04:57you
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended