Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 months ago
Several lawyers, including members of the Philippine Constitution Association or Philconsa support the call for the Supreme Court to review the facts behind its decision to bar the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte.

Full story: https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/explainers/factual-questions-supreme-court-decision-sara-duterte-impeachment/
Transcript
00:00Several lawyers, including members of the Philippine Constitution Association, or FILCONSA,
00:06support the call for the Supreme Court to review the facts behind its decision
00:10to bar the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte.
00:13They are also hoping the justices would reverse the decision if they agree they were wrong.
00:18FILCONSA, chaired by retired Chief Justice Reynato Puno, says,
00:21We therefore urge the Supreme Court to review the salient facts it relied upon in its decision
00:26to make sure the facts speak the truth, for only a decision based on indubitable facts can stand time in its vicissitudes.
00:33The Supreme Court ruled that the first three complaints were effectively dismissed
00:36because they were not acted upon up to the time the 19th Congress adjourned on February 5.
00:42The same day, the House reached the one-third vote needed to file the fourth complaint.
00:45However, opposition group 1-Sambayan noted the fourth complaint was already sent to the Senate at 4.57pm on February 5
00:52and Congress didn't officially adjourn until 7.15 that evening.
00:56FILCONSA adds the High Court did not have all the facts necessary to make a decision invulnerable to constitutional assaults.
01:03This is also why some lawyers are decrying the fact that the Supreme Court made its decision
01:07without holding oral arguments, which could have been a chance to present all the facts.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended