Skip to player
Skip to main content
Search
Connect
Watch fullscreen
Like
Bookmark
Share
More
Add to Playlist
Report
'Who Won The 2020 Election For President Of The United States?': Welch Grills Judge Nom Emil Bove
Forbes Breaking News
Follow
4 months ago
At today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. Peter Welch (D-VT) questioned Emil Bove, nominee to be to be United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, and current Deputy AG.
Category
🗞
News
Transcript
Display full video transcript
00:00
Into the record from 91 former senior Justice Department officials, including 52 former United States attorneys,
00:06
they urged the committee to support Mr. Bovey's nomination.
00:10
The letter from the U.S. Attorney says, and I'll quote,
00:13
Mr. Bovey's professionalism, integrity, medal, and experience,
00:17
expertise make him an outstanding candidate to serve as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
00:25
And with that, I will turn it over to Senator Welch.
00:30
Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
00:32
Welcome.
00:34
This question of temperament obviously is relevant.
00:37
You'd acknowledge that.
00:39
Yes, Senator.
00:39
Okay.
00:40
And you made a comment in response to Senator Booker who's asking you questions,
00:46
and I'll ask these as well, that complaints were never made ethically,
00:51
and there'd be a responsibility of an attorney to make those ethical complaints under the Judicial Code.
00:57
I just have to say I disagree with that.
01:00
I mean, I was a defense attorney, worked with many prosecutors, had enormous respect for those prosecutors.
01:06
So the temperament issue doesn't always get into the question of whether it's an ethical violation,
01:13
but it does get into the temperament and why that, in my view, is very important, whatever our job is,
01:21
but particularly for a judge where you've got that incredible power.
01:23
So I do want to go through some of these questions that have been raised by that letter that was sent,
01:31
making some complaints about you.
01:34
You were described as vindictive.
01:36
There was references to abuse of power, a refusal to engage in any discussion about the case,
01:45
and there was one in particular that stood out to me.
01:49
One of the attorneys in a case involving someone who was detained had information that the person had, in fact,
02:01
reported as required, and he was trying to provide you with this information
02:08
because the hearing about his client's well-being was to take place soon,
02:13
and it says that you snippily told me that he would not even try to call the PO,
02:18
I assume that's a probation officer, on such short notice after I suggested he could at least try to reach out,
02:25
and then you might get lucky and catch him.
02:28
Is that true?
02:29
No, Senator, it's not true, and that's exactly the type of issue raised in that email
02:34
where it's an allegation about an abuse of power that if true...
02:37
So you did make the phone call?
02:40
No, the whole episode as described in that email is not accurate.
02:45
Well, I'm not going to know that, and I'm not sure you do,
02:50
but the basic point here is that you could have made a phone call that would have resolved the situation
02:55
whether his client had, in fact, reported or had not, and you wouldn't make it.
03:00
So you're denying that that's true?
03:03
I do deny, and I think the paragraph describes that one of my colleagues stepped in.
03:07
All right, let me go on to the next one.
03:10
Thank you for giving me your answer.
03:11
The prosecutorial misconduct scandal, that is of concern to me and presumably would be of great concern to you
03:18
and your job as a prosecutor.
03:21
And what the judge found, the errors were so severe that following a jury verdict in its favor,
03:27
the government determined that further prosecution of the case would not be in the interest of justice.
03:32
I mean, this is a case where there were prosecutorial assets used,
03:36
there was a conviction, and then the prosecution had to end it, right?
03:41
Right, and I was one of the supervisors who participated in that decision
03:45
because I was so disturbed by the violations that had taken place.
03:48
But what the judge said, as I understand it, is that you offered little in the way of supervision.
03:55
And so as I've said, I respect Judge Nathan's decision.
03:58
That aspect of the opinion...
03:59
But he said that, right?
04:00
It said that, but it was always difficult for me to square that with the fact that
04:03
during the operative weekend on both days, I was with the prosecutors.
04:07
The record reflects that I spoke to the prosecutors at 10 o'clock on Saturday night,
04:11
at 10 o'clock on Sunday night.
04:13
So again, I'm not perfect, but I did do my best there.
04:16
My best wasn't enough, and I acknowledge that.
04:19
But I don't think it's true that I didn't work hard on it.
04:21
Let me go on to a third thing.
04:23
In 20 and 2021, the Southern District's Executive Committee initiated a formal investigation into your conduct.
04:34
And my understanding is that after that happened, that's when you shortly thereafter left the Southern District.
04:41
Is that correct?
04:42
No.
04:42
When did you leave the Southern District?
04:46
December of 2021.
04:48
December of 2021?
04:50
Yes.
04:50
Yeah, well, that's shortly after the 2021 investigation.
04:55
Have you ever been asked or had to take anger management or behavioral management at the Southern District?
05:02
No.
05:03
All right.
05:04
Who won the 2020 election for President of the United States?
05:11
President Biden was certified as the winner of that election.
05:14
So you give the standard answer?
05:15
You can't say that he won because he got the majority of votes and also got the Electoral College victory?
05:23
I think the characterizations that you just made, Senator, are both political,
05:28
and so I can't address them under the canons, and they're also tied up in ongoing litigation.
05:31
Help me understand how it's political to state who got the most votes in any election.
05:45
Senator, I'm just trying to be precise.
05:47
The process by which our country declares the victor in an election is a certification process.
05:54
President Biden was certified.
05:55
Thank you, Senator Welch.
05:56
Feel back.
05:58
Senator Blackburn.
05:59
Thank you, Madam Chairman.
06:00
And congratulations on your nomination.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Recommended
6:35
|
Up next
'Do You Consider Yourself A Textualist?': Josh Hawley Questions Controversial Trump Nom Emil Bove
Forbes Breaking News
4 months ago
10:27
'Were You Involved In Her Removal?': Sheldon Whitehouse Grills Top Trump Judicial Nominee Emil Bove
Forbes Breaking News
4 months ago
5:45
'What Is The Importance Of The Constitution?': Ted Cruz Questions Trump Judge Nominee Emil Bove
Forbes Breaking News
4 months ago
1:04
Senate Invokes Cloture On Controversial Nomination Of Emil Bove To Serve As Circuit Judge
Forbes Breaking News
3 months ago
6:54
'The Hypocrisy Continues To Shock Me': Ashley Moody Calls Out Actions Of Left-Wing Judges
Forbes Breaking News
3 months ago
6:08
'Can You Tell Me How Many January 6 Rioters Pres. Trump Pardoned?': Alex Padilla Grills Emil Bove
Forbes Breaking News
4 months ago
0:45
Senate Confirms Emil Bove To Be A Judge On The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court Of Appeals
Forbes Breaking News
2 months ago
7:23
Dick Durbin Confronts Top Trump DOJ Nominee About Involvement In Pardon For Eric Adams
Forbes Breaking News
4 months ago
5:50
Emil Bove Has Brutal Exchange With Hirono When Confronted Over Accusations Of 'Abusive Behavior'
Forbes Breaking News
4 months ago
8:37
Trump's Judge Nominee Emil Bove Outright Refuses To Answer Blumenthal's Question
Forbes Breaking News
4 months ago
5:33
'I Want You To Look Me In The Eye And Swear To Your Higher Being When You Answer This...': John Kennedy
Forbes Breaking News
4 months ago
6:41
'By Your Own Written Admission...': Amy Klobuchar Grills Emil Bove Over Eric Adams Pardon
Forbes Breaking News
4 months ago
1:40
Dick Durbin Slams Emil Bove For Not Being Able To Practice Law In Court He's Nominated To
Forbes Breaking News
3 months ago
5:59
'I'll Pretend You're Telling Me The Truth...': Peter Welch Quickly Gets Fed Up With Trump's Judge Nominee
Forbes Breaking News
2 months ago
8:11
John Barrasso Defends Controversial Nom, Emil Bove, Puts Spotlight On Democrats' 'Radical' Judges
Forbes Breaking News
3 months ago
7:25
Cory Booker Tells Emil Bove To His Face He Hopes Evidence Will Come Out Proving He's Lied to Senate
Forbes Breaking News
4 months ago
26:34
Chuck Grassley Condemns Democrats' 'Vicious Rhetoric' Against Trump's Judicial Nominee, Emil Bove
Forbes Breaking News
2 months ago
12:33
'Mr. Bove Said F-U To The Courts': Sheldon Whitehouse Issues Blunt Takedown Of Emil Bove
Forbes Breaking News
3 months ago
7:01
'Look Me In The Eye And Just Answer My Question': John Kennedy Shows No Mercy To Federal Judge Nom
Forbes Breaking News
5 weeks ago
5:21
'The Claims In That Email Are False': Emil Bove Fires Back At Cory Booker
Forbes Breaking News
3 months ago
13:18
'One Day, Roles Will Reverse Again': Chuck Grassley Warns Democrats Attempting To Block Emil Bove
Forbes Breaking News
3 months ago
19:31
Dick Durbin Absolutely Lights Into Judicial Nom Emil Bove For Showing 'Utter Disdain For Our Courts'
Forbes Breaking News
3 months ago
3:30
'I Don't Want To Split Hairs Here!': John Kennedy Grills Judicial Nom About Ignoring Court Orders
Forbes Breaking News
4 months ago
8:41
'This Nominee Is In A Category All Of His Own': Dick Durbin Mercilessly Shreds Emil Bove's Record
Forbes Breaking News
3 months ago
0:42
Beijing Mirrors U.S. Port Fees In Retaliation, Raising Costs For Shippers And Consumers
Benzinga
9 hours ago
Be the first to comment