Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 5 months ago
On "Forbes Newsroom," Forbes Staff Writer Emma Whitford discussed her report detailing the 39 colleges and universities with the ability to resist President Trump, as Harvard has.
Transcript
00:00Hi, everyone. I'm Maggie McGrath, senior editor at Forbes. President Trump has frozen federal
00:09research funding for a number of American colleges and universities. He's issued demands
00:15from many of these schools in exchange for federal dollars. Harvard has particularly
00:20been in the headlines this week. In light of this, Forbes has produced a list of 39
00:27institutions that have the ability to join Harvard in its resistance to President Trump.
00:33Joining me now to discuss this list and her article with it is Emma Whitford. She's a staff
00:38writer covering K through 12 and higher education. Emma, thank you so much for joining us.
00:44Thanks for having me, Maggie.
00:45So let's set the table before we get into this list. What exactly is the tussle between American
00:51universities and President Trump? What's going on here? So President Trump has been coming after
00:57American universities through a variety of different channels. One of the more recent ones is he's been
01:04freezing federal funding or threatening to do so for some prominent research universities under the
01:11guise that they have somehow failed to protect Jewish students from anti-Semitism. There's a lot
01:18of arguments about the legality of those claims and those are being battled out in the courts. But in
01:23the meantime, universities are risking losing billions of dollars in federal funding for research.
01:32And I mentioned in my intro that Harvard made headlines this week. President Alan Gerber basically
01:38said he'd refuse to cave to demands that the university eliminate diversity programs. What else did
01:44Harvard say this week and why is it such a big deal? Yeah, not very many colleges so far have
01:50stood up to Trump and said, you know, we're not going to do the myriad demands that you've given us.
01:56Do what you will. We're going to keep our diversity programs. We're not going to review
02:01academic programs. We're not going to punish students. They've been issuing a slew of different
02:07things that usually the federal government would not be involved in. So Harvard's sort of the first one
02:12that's gotten a specific list of demands and decided not to do it. I will note that Princeton University
02:18has been pretty outspoken as well, but they have yet to receive any sort of specific demands from the
02:25Trump administration. So we're getting basically the situation where an American president is
02:33threatening American universities financially. And within the course of academia, we know this,
02:40some universities are better positioned to have funding pulled than others. Can you talk about
02:45the conversations you've been having with editors and what led to this list of 39 Trump-proof
02:51universities? For sure. I want to start with the caveat that no one's really Trump-proof,
02:59but these are sort of the 39 schools that probably stand the best chance to standing up to Trump and to
03:06figure out who they were. We want to take a look at their financials. So one of the first things we
03:11considered was their endowment. So how much money do they have sort of to keep operations running
03:19into perpetuity? I will note that endowment is different than a savings fund or a rainy day fund.
03:25They can't just tap into that money and move it. So Harvard couldn't say, you know, we're going to
03:30take $2.2 billion from our $53 billion endowment and cover the research funding. They'd have to
03:37jump through a lot of hoops if they want to use endowment funding on research. Usually it's earmarked
03:41for things like student aid or a faculty position. They'd have to go back to the donor, whoever gave
03:47that specific money, and sort of ask if they can reallocate it to something like research, which is
03:52possible but difficult. And then another thing that we were looking at was their financial grade,
03:59which is a list that Forbes puts out every year. We evaluate private colleges on a variety of
04:04metrics, everything from endowment size, return on assets, to how much are they discounting tuition,
04:11what is their admissions yield, to sort of determine the overall financial health of the school.
04:17So we were looking at colleges that also had pretty high grades. I think all the schools on our
04:22list of 39 are B plus or above. And does that grade incorporate the credit rating on the institution?
04:29Because your story notes that Harvard has a triple A debt rating and also relatively little reliance on
04:36federal support for operations compared to others. How important is that debt rating in this calculation
04:44for the 39 schools? We actually don't include the debt rating in that calculation. That's just
04:50something I wanted to know about Harvard and a handful of the schools on our list is that they
04:55want to access debt. They can do so pretty easily. We do factor into that list the reliance on federal
05:04dollars. So a lot of those schools, it makes up less than 20% of their operating revenues every year.
05:13So that could be things like Pell grants, which are grants for student tuition
05:18that most schools receive. And then a lot of it is also research funding from NIH or
05:23NSF. But the schools on our list have other revenue streams, things like tuition that they can sort of lean
05:31back on if their federal funding is to decrease. So a lot of them are small private liberal arts colleges that
05:38really focus on undergraduate teaching and don't do as much research as some of the big public R1
05:45universities. Interesting. So a more research focused university might not be on this list.
05:52Right. So there are some on here, a lot of the big private schools like Harvard, like Washington
05:57University, Vanderbilt, Johns Hopkins, schools that really focus on research. You will see on there,
06:06but that's because they are also so wealthy on their own. But a lot of the public schools that
06:12have a little bit smaller endowments and still do a ton of research and get a ton of funding from the
06:19feds, they wouldn't be included on this list. So let's get into it. I won't make you do all 39 from
06:25memory, but can you take us through some of the highlights of this list of colleges that have the
06:32endowment, the financial health and the revenue to push back against Trump's overarching federal
06:38funding stipulations? For sure. So you will see a school like Princeton University on there.
06:45They have the highest endowment per student. So it's not the largest endowment in total. But if you look
06:53at how much money they have for their relatively small enrollment, it is larger than any university in
06:59the country. So they're pretty well off. And even though they get about 43% of their operating
07:05revenues from federal dollars, their president's already been very outspoken about not wanting to
07:10keep Trump. So we want to keep them on the list because we expect them to continue to push and try
07:15and outlast any sort of federal overreach. And then you've got some small liberal arts college,
07:21liberal arts colleges like Pomona College, Principia College, Williams in Massachusetts. And those are
07:30all pretty focused on the undergraduate teaching experience. They only get a few percent of their
07:36revenue from the federal government. They're not doing a lot of research. And then they also are very,
07:42very independently wealthy. So we expect they would be able to outlast four years of any federal
07:48institutions. Let's get into that endowment per student really quickly. So I understand some
07:54commenters are saying, you know, you can't just look just at endowment. So why is it important to break
08:01that in that big endowment figure down to the endowment per student? Yeah, so if you think about schools
08:09like Columbia University, which has already caved to some of Trump's demands, or Cornell University, they have
08:16these really large endowments, but they also enroll so many students that those endowment earnings just
08:23aren't going to go quite as far because their expenditures are so much higher. So then if you
08:27look at a school like Princeton that does have that really high endowment per student number, they've just
08:33got so much more saved compared to what their relative teaching expenses are that it would go a lot
08:40farther to help them. One of the figures here that's really interesting to me, a longtime Forbes
08:46staffer, I love the math, I love the numbers, is federal funding as a percentage as of operating
08:51revenues. And some of these schools, it's remarkably little. Grinnell is 1.4 percent, Williams 2.3.
08:59Swarthmore College from where I'm from in Pennsylvania is 2.1. I'm surprised by some of these figures.
09:07You report on this on a regular basis. Did any of this surprise you, or is this kind of standard
09:13fare? A little bit. I'll note that these numbers are a little bit crude because I use federal data
09:20to calculate these, and it doesn't split that up into different types of federal money. So I can't
09:26tell, you know, what is research, what is student grant aid, that kind of thing. But schools like the
09:33ones you mentioned, like Grinnell or Swarthmore, you know, they're very reliant on tuition. They,
09:39schools or students pay a pretty high price tag to attend. So a lot of their funding is coming from
09:45that stream and less so from the federal government, which would be supporting a lot more research
09:51behind the scenes kind of things.
09:52What surprised you about this list that you put together here? Was there a name of a university
09:59or college that once all the math was done, you were like, wow, I did not expect to see that name
10:04here?
10:06Yeah, there was one that surprised us all, I think, which is Soka University of America.
10:12I don't know if you've heard of it. It's very tiny. It's in California, and it's very wealthy
10:18compared to the number of students they have. It's supported by Japanese, a Japanese Buddhist sect
10:25that has given them quite a bit of money and seems to operate pretty independently. So
10:30that was kind of a strange, cool name to see on here.
10:38And there's also a few just smaller specialized schools like the Juilliard School,
10:43Curtis Institute of Music, that seem to have pretty low enrollments, but pretty healthy endowments and
10:50low reliance on federal dollars. So they'll probably do fine as well.
10:55Were there any schools you expected to see come out in this ranking that ultimately did not make the cut?
11:03I was a little bit surprised not to see Columbia or Cornell on here. I knew that they had high
11:10enrollments, but I thought their endowments were big enough that they would still make this list.
11:15So it was a little bit eye-opening to see just how vulnerable they still may be, even though
11:22they are seen as really prestigious, untouchable schools. It's precarious, even for the big guys
11:30like Harvard. I mean, they're standing up, but it's tough for everybody.
11:35What you said about how endowments are earmarked, I think, is really interesting and also important.
11:41Did any of your sources talk about how long it would take to perhaps un-earmark those dollars
11:47from the endowment in order to make up for any federal funding dissipation?
11:52It would really vary. I think it would depend on the scale of how many people you're approaching to
11:58talk about this. I asked my sources if there had been any historical events where schools have had
12:03to do this in the past. And there really haven't been, except if the school is somehow in dire
12:09financial circumstances for some other reason. So maybe they're facing closure and they want to tap
12:14that endowment more so than they would year to year. Then they might go back to donors and talk about
12:21that, but it would involve a lot of man hours, a lot of paperwork, and a lot of legal hoops to jump
12:28through. So it's not necessarily a practical solution that colleges have, but it could be an option.
12:36One of the other factors that comes up in your piece is international students,
12:40which you mentioned when talking about MIT. MIT did not make this list of Trump-proof universities.
12:47So I'm wondering, how does a college or university's international student population play
12:54into its ability to counteract the effects of the administration?
12:59Right. So the Trump administration has really gone after international students. They've been
13:04revoking visas all over the place with loosely justified reasoning or sometimes no reasoning at all.
13:10And this is a problem for colleges financially because a lot of them rely on international students
13:17to come and pay full tuition, which even though private colleges have these really high tuition
13:24rates, like somewhere in the $70,000, $80,000 range, most domestic students don't pay that. They get some
13:30sort of merit scholarship that discounts that rate. So maybe they're paying only $40,000 a year out of
13:37that $70,000. But international students don't tend to get that kind of financial aid. So schools rely on
13:44them to pay that full fare and that sort of works out to help discount for domestic students. So if they
13:51lose that stream of enrollment from international students, it's another financial hit that they're
13:58having to deal with. I'm going to ask a question that might be a story idea for you in the future. But
14:03back when I was covering student loans and student debt in 2013 and 14, something that came up a lot was
14:09the idea of net tuition revenue and then how much aid is left over from the money a college has, I'm
14:17speaking super crudely, to give aid to students. Have any of your sources indicated that schools could
14:22start offering less financial aid, fewer scholarships, fewer grants in order to protect
14:28their revenue stream, their bottom lines from federal action?
14:34I have been asking about that. And they're in a bit of a pickle. Because as much as yes, it would save
14:44them money to start offering less grant aid to students. They also would not necessarily be able
14:50to attract that student. So if you're going to offer 50% aid on a $80,000 tuition fee, so the students
15:00only paying $40,000 to attend, they might opt to enroll because they can afford that. Whereas if
15:05you're only offering a 25% scholarship on the $80,000 fee and they can't necessarily afford the $60,000
15:13bill, then you're not getting any money from that student at all. So it's not necessarily a good idea
15:19for them to decrease those discounting rates because it might just end up to enrollment declining and then
15:24they're facing an even greater financial challenge.
15:28That's one of the big questions that remains. And as you described that situation, I'm also
15:32picturing a homogenization that could occur to some student bodies, right, if you're offering
15:37less in grants and aids, which would perhaps go towards the administration's goal of rolling back
15:42DEI, just perhaps in a way that was not intended, or at least we can't say if it was intended. But Emma,
15:48as we look towards the future, towards the end of the school year, what are the questions that are
15:53at the top of your mind and that you'll be asking sources in the days and weeks to come?
15:58Yeah, it changes every day because there's always new news coming from this administration and how
16:04colleges are responding. One of the things I'm looking at right now is what role philanthropy might
16:11play in this. In the past, the federal government has always been sort of the main funder of research
16:19at universities, but maybe we'll see foundations start to step up and try and fill some of those gaps.
16:26Another thing I'm wondering about is how this is going to impact international student enrollment.
16:30There's been a ton of speculation about it. And this month is when students will start putting
16:36down their deposits. So we'll get to see if there's actually going to be a decline if students from
16:42outside the U.S. don't want to come here anymore and what kind of impact that will have on classes next
16:47fall. Of course. May 1st is decision day. Is that right? Yes, it is. So we'll have data pretty soon
16:54after that? Yeah, they tend to release numbers throughout May. All right. Well, we'll have to
17:00have you back to give us an update based on what you're seeing then, because I am also interested in
17:04these questions and their answers. But before I let you go for now, is there anything else you want
17:10the Forbes audience to know about your story on these Trump-proof universities? I don't think so. I think
17:16we've covered us a bit. Thanks. Great. Thank you so much, Emma. I appreciate your time. Thank you.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended