'The Ball Is Truly In Their Court': Rubio Says Onus To Accept Ceasefire Deal On Russia

Forbes Breaking News

Speaking to reporters in Shannon, Ireland, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that Russia must now accept the ceasefire deal with Ukraine.

Transcript

00:00response officially? And are they willing to accept the ceasefire unconditionally?

00:05Well, I mean, we don't know the answer to the last question. That's what we want to know,

00:08whether they're prepared to do it unconditionally. We'll have contact with them today. There's

00:12already been contacts at different levels with counterparts, different members of the

00:16administration, and that'll continue. But as far as the Russian reaction to it, that's really the

00:23question here. And that is, you know, this is a few hours old. We're going to bring it to them

00:28directly. We're going to say that Ukraine is prepared to stop all battlefield activity and

00:34begin the immediate process of negotiating a enduring end to the war. And we'll see what

00:39their response is. If their response is yes, then we know we've made real progress and there's a

00:43real chance of peace. If their response is no, it would be highly unfortunate and it would make

00:48their intentions clear. So that's what we're hoping to hear from them. And obviously, as I

00:53said, this was not prearranged for them. So they're probably processing the news the same

00:59as the rest of the world is. So we hope to have a positive answer from them. The ball

01:02is truly in their court.

01:05Nike Chun with Voice of America. What would be a good G7 joint statement on Russia and on China?

01:14Well, I think the perfect statement would be that the United States has done a good thing for the

01:18world in bringing this process forward. And now we all eagerly await the Russian response and

01:26urge them strongly to consider ending all hostilities so people will stop dying, so

01:31bullets will stop flying, and so a process can begin to find a permanent peace. I think the

01:36first step in all this is the acceptance that there is no military solution to this conflict.

01:40Neither side can militarily achieve their maximalist gains, their maximalist goals.

01:45Neither side can achieve them through the military side. The only way this conflict can end

01:50is through negotiation. That's the only way you're going to have peace, is through negotiation.

01:54And so we need to start that process. And it is hard to start a process when people are

01:58shooting at each other and people are dying. And so our hope is that we can stop that,

02:03all these hostilities, and get to a negotiating table where both sides over some period of time

02:09with a lot of hard work can find a mutually acceptable outcome that, in the case of Ukraine,

02:14obviously secures their long-term prosperity and security.

02:17Q Mr. Secretary, could you just update us on Mr. Whitkoff's plans for Moscow and whether he'll

02:24be meeting with President Putin? And then separately, if you wouldn't mind elaborating

02:27on something that Mr. Waltz said yesterday about the specifics that you discussed with the Ukrainians

02:31about what the end of the war would look like. You had mentioned we're not going to get maps

02:35out and draw lines, but did you actually talk about territorial concessions?

02:38SECRETARY POMPEO We had conversations. As far as Steve's trip,

02:42I'm not here to – I can't – I'm not going to make any announcements about specific dates,

02:45times, or even confirm such a trip. Suffice it to say there's going to be

02:49multiple points of contact with the Russians to gauge are they willing to do this or not.

02:56And as far as the conversations that were yesterday, yeah, when you sit down with a

03:00counterpart like Ukraine, we're not going to negotiate this publicly. We're not going to

03:05actually put out there sort of what we talked about, because in any negotiation there's certainly

03:10an element where you don't want one side to be giving away all this leverage from a public

03:14perspective. We had a broad conversation about what it would – but I think the bulk of our

03:20conversation was what a negotiation process would look like in terms of not the specific conditions

03:26but rather the timing of it, sort of the steps they would like to see taken. The Ukrainians

03:30made very clear that this isn't just about ending a war. They need to get their prisoners of war

03:34back. They need to get the children back. They'd like to see an exchange of prisoners of war.

03:39They'd like to see their children back. So there's all sorts of things tied to the humanitarian

03:44assistance is important as well. There are areas of Ukraine that have been badly damaged that require

03:49immediate assistance. So these are the sorts of things that we talked about as being inclusive

03:54in the negotiation process. So really, the bulk of our conversation when we got to that stage of it

03:59was discussing the kinds of items that need to be on a new negotiation agenda

04:04even when we hopefully get there.

04:05He also mentioned security guarantees, which is something that there has been some reluctance for

04:10the administration to elaborate on. Are you committing to security guarantees?

04:13Well, I think the point – no, the point to understand is that we're looking at is securing

04:16their long-term – what we want to see, like any country in the world, Ukraine wants their

04:20long-term security. They want to make sure that this doesn't happen, and we all do.

04:24What is the point of spending all this time to get a ceasefire hopefully and then a negotiated

04:29end to the war only to see it re-spark up again in about six years, four years, three years? No

04:34one's – we're not interested in that, and they certainly aren't either. So I think the question

04:38really is more about a deterrence. Can Ukraine create a sufficient deterrent against future

04:44aggression, against future attack, against future invasion? Because every country in the world has

04:48a right to defend themselves, and no one can dispute that. So that will most certainly have

04:52to be part of the conversation. But again, I don't think there's – there isn't a peace to secure

04:57until you have a peace. But there's no way to have an enduring peace without the deterrence

05:02peace being a part of it. Can I just follow up on that? Yes. Because the joint statement talks

05:07about European partners being involved in the peace process, but that's only attributed to the

05:12Ukrainian delegation. There doesn't appear to be U.S. support for that line. Well, I think what

05:16it says in the statement is that they raised the need for the Europeans. But I've already said

05:20publicly the Europeans have issued a series of sanctions against the Russian Federation,

05:25and I would imagine that in any negotiation, if we get there hopefully with the Russians,

05:29that they will raise these European – the European sanctions that have been imposed upon

05:36them. So I think that the issue of European sanctions are going to be on the table, not to

05:40mention what happens with the frozen assets and the like. And so I think it's self-evident that

05:44for there to be a peace in Ukraine, at the end of that process there's going to have to be some

05:51decision made by the Europeans about what they're going to do with these sanctions and so forth.

05:56And so that's why I think they have to be necessarily involved in this regard.

05:59Now, whether they're involved at the front end of it or at the back end of it, it'll have to

06:03play itself out. And then obviously there's also all sorts of security promises that European

06:09countries have made to Ukraine, that that will also be, I imagine, a part of this conversation

06:13as we move forward. So we don't disagree with that statement. I think the statement just reflects

06:17that they raised it. Do you back European peacekeepers in Ukraine, which is something

06:21Russia is categorizing? Well, we'll see. I mean, there's different ways to construct a deterrent

06:28on the ground that prevents another war from starting in the future. We're not going to go

06:32in with any sort of preconceived notion. The bottom line is it needs to be something that

06:37makes Ukraine feel as if they can deter and prevent a future invasion. How that looks and

06:42how that's put together, that's what we're going to be talking about. If we can get to that stage.

06:46Again, right now we're just trying to get to the stage where there's actual

06:49diplomacy happening. Here's what we'd like the world to look like in a few days.

06:53Neither side is shooting at each other, not rockets, not missiles, not bullets,

06:57nothing, not artillery. The shooting stops, the fighting stops, and the talking starts.

07:02That's what we want to see. What happens during that talking and how that evolves,

07:06I think we're going to have to be flexible and nimble and creative and patient and work hard

07:10at it and hopefully turn it into something that's concrete. You've covered – many of you have

07:15covered foreign policy for years. That's how these things happen, and they're not easy,

07:19and sometimes they're difficult to predict which way they're going to go in terms of

07:22the specifics of it. But we just want to get to that stage. That would be, for lack of a better

07:28term, a good problem to have, to have to figure out how to negotiate a peace because we're actually

07:32negotiating a peace while the shooting has stopped.

07:35Is the mineral deal essentially the security guarantee that you

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended