Skip to playerSkip to main content
Sa patuloy na pagkalat ng mga fake news online, tila isang hamon sa bawat isa ang anunsyo ng Meta na titigilan na ang partnership kasama ang third-party fact-checkers na magsisimula sa United States. Imbes na ma-fact-check kasi ang mga post sa ilalim ng Meta, ang mga eligible user ay mag-iiwan na lang ng “Community Notes” na gaya ng sa X.

Paano nga ba mapoprotektahan ang sarili laban sa disinformation online kung wala ng fact-checkers? Here’s what you #NeedToKnow.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00This is it, Mars!
00:03Admit it, you're also one of those who get emotional when your friend's chat is like that.
00:09Or you're one of those who wait for screenshots to be uploaded online for you to open.
00:15But be careful, okay? Because what you see on social media is not true.
00:21Especially if you announce a meta, they will remove the fact checker from their social media platforms.
00:28In the absence of a fact checker in the meta, how can netizens protect themselves against misinformation online?
00:37Here's what you need to know.
00:43If you're fond of looking for screenshots as a receipt whenever you're online,
00:48the fact checkers are also like that.
00:50Fact checkers are considered as one of the frontliners against misinformation online.
01:20They correct based on their research, based on actual information.
01:27But this January 7, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that they will stop their fact checking program
01:35on their social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram, and Reds.
01:39First, we're going to get rid of fact checkers and replace them with community notes similar to X starting in the US.
02:09Facebook is also a social media platform owned by Meta based in Datos.
02:15Meta's main goal is to protect free speech by removing fact checkers from their social media platforms.
02:31In return, Meta will promote a community-driven system that gives context to posts
02:37such as community notes implemented in X's platform.
02:43In X, any eligible user can sign up as a community notes contributor.
02:54Once X approves a user as a notes contributor,
02:59he can rate other community notes as helpful or not helpful.
03:04Notes that received a helpful final status from other contributors
03:10will be shown to all X users under the following post.
03:14Although this feature is user-centered,
03:17according to Professor Ong,
03:19removing Meta from the fact checking program is like pretending to monitor the protection of free speech.
03:25He considers this a power play.
03:29In replacing community notes with fact checkers in Meta,
03:33users are given the responsibility to verify information.
03:38There are only a few subjects and topics that are given context through community notes
03:43unlike our systematic fact-checking systems in place.
03:47There are many layers in fact-checking.
03:51The responsibility is not shared between news organizations or fact-checking organizations and our citizens.
03:58It's up to the citizen.
04:00Facebook has saved millions of pesos.
04:04Now that users will have the power to moderate content,
04:09always remember that great power comes with great responsibility.
04:15What should social media users do to verify information independently and responsibly?
04:23First of all, I think our citizens need to know who they need to trust in terms of their sources of information.
04:31There are many news outlets out there.
04:34We have reliable news outlets that we have.
04:37To avoid confusion,
04:39check the page of the news outlet of the post you read.
04:43Most of the credible news pages on social media are verified or have blue checkmarks in their names.
04:49Also, check the domain of the links they share,
04:54like .com, .org, or .edu.
04:58If it's highlighted like .lo or .xyz,
05:02it might be negative.
05:04Second, it's not enough to verify one time.
05:09You also have to check, okay, do other sources say the same?
05:12Is it consistently the same information they're saying?
05:15That means my second verification,
05:17the journalists know that they need a second source to confirm a story.
05:22So we extend that kind of practice among our citizens as well.
05:27If you have doubts about the news you read,
05:30you can search for the references mentioned in the article or report you saw,
05:34such as official press releases, government reports, and scientific studies of institutions.
05:41Also double-check the date when the information you saw was published.
05:45There are contents that resurface due to the new activity of other users,
05:50which can cause confusion among other netizens.
05:53Now, you need to double, triple verify if what you read is correct.
06:01Because it's not just for you to be more informed,
06:04but there are consequences if you don't read the actual factual information.
06:11The absence of fact-checkers in the meta has a clear effect on society.
06:16But we can still do something to make the online world a safe space against misinformation.
06:23So for now, it's time to cut off from fake, fake information, fake stories, and even fake people.
06:32Period.
Comments

Recommended