00:00The prosecutor Rosa is the new prosecutor of justice in the field of, for example, clandestine bets.
00:08It is a cause...
00:10There are many famous people, right?
00:1116.
00:1216 famous people.
00:13Impeached.
00:14The qualification, the character of the cause is necessary participant.
00:19And the necessary participant, to translate it quickly, is that you are an accomplice of...
00:24And that without your complicity or without your action, the person who carries out, in this case,
00:30a clandestine game through online platforms...
00:33Which is illegal, because being clandestine is illegal.
00:36Exactly.
00:37There are platforms that are legal and these are illegal.
00:39Completely illegal.
00:40That is the only difference, right? Verifiable.
00:42It was an illegal betting site.
00:44Exactly.
00:45Actually, here they promoted something, look, we have some cards so that the qualification and the seriousness of the matter are understood.
00:51Yes.
00:52They are, as we said...
00:53Capture of players to bet on illegal platforms.
00:56That is the imputation.
00:57Of course.
00:58What does the prosecutor say?
00:59You are accused of capturing, that is, of...
01:03I don't know if of cheating, cheating no, but yes, of encouraging people to participate in that online platform...
01:08Of course.
01:09Of course, it is a clandestine platform.
01:11And then, you see that...
01:13I think that here what aggravates the matter, that is why it is necessary participant,
01:17is that they promoted, in addition to the platform, a cell phone number.
01:22That cell phone number, where did it lead you?
01:25It led you directly to where?
01:27To the cashier.
01:28To the cashier.
01:29To the man who billed.
01:30Who is that cashier?
01:31Nobody knows.
01:32It is a mysterious WhatsApp.
01:34The truth is that there they collected the money.
01:36That is, the famous helped everything end up in the cashier.
01:40Who was the cashier? The one who had the money.
01:42Now, the imputation of necessary participant, Pamela, has a sentence of 3 to 6 years.
01:46It is punishable for those who do not have a record.
01:50That is, if...
01:52I do not think they condemn anyone.
01:54Now I'm going to give you my point of view.
01:56Yes.
01:57But if they get to...
01:58Yes, because they can allege their own clumsiness, say that I knew.
02:01That's what everyone is going to say.
02:03In the last few hours, so far, only two have declared.
02:06Joaco López, who is a YouTuber, a streamer, and then Furia declared.
02:11Furia what?
02:12Furia Altaglione.
02:13She was locked up, so...
02:14What did Julia say?
02:15I was...
02:16Big brother, they handled my phone.
02:18That declared.
02:19Did she declare her sister or not?
02:21For now, she declared Furia.
02:23My sister handled the phone.
02:24Sure.
02:25And Joaco López, attention, because now I'm going to tell you how this could end.
02:28In an arrangement between Fiscalía, Elegante, and the rest of the celebrities.
02:32How?
02:33Well, trying to repair the damage, for example, with a video recognizing an error.
02:37Just with that?
02:38With that, they could repair a damage.
02:40And the people who lost money also lost it by their own decision.
02:42By betting illegally.
02:44There they are going directly to the financial structure.
02:47Let's say, those who thought the game of betting illegally, right?
02:50Well, let's go to the cell phone.
02:52Paulita Wilberger is here.
02:54How nice to have you again.
02:55Hello, Paula.
02:57How are you?
02:58I missed you.
02:59It's been a long time since we saw each other.
03:01I tell you that I am in the Public Ministry of the Judicial Power of the City.
03:06This is where the Fiscalía Especializada in Juegos de Azar works.
03:09Who is leading this investigation of illegal gambling promoted on social networks.
03:16By more than 16 famous influencers, whose round of inquiries has already begun.
03:22Yesterday, you said, they already declared two, including FURIA.
03:26And today it is the turn of Elian Valenzuela.
03:29Elegant, he comes at 10 in the morning.
03:32He has to be here, face to face, with the prosecutor.
03:36And who carries out this investigation.
03:39Of course, you said, what are they going to say?
03:42Yes, that they contacted them, that they promote an infinity of products on their social networks.
03:47And some, what they are going to say is that we did not even have contact with the websites,
03:52but we did it through press agencies that handle this type of business.
03:58That the press agencies should have checked.
04:01Well, it's not bad.
04:03It's not bad, I think, as a model.
04:06The times you promote a hair product, you promote a product so you don't try it,
04:12but obviously they pay you money as a model.
04:15So the agency is partly responsible.
04:17The agency should, I get the feeling, check that the site is not ...
04:21I'm telling you to sell something illegal.
04:23Yes, I think that here, the purpose of this matter,
04:26is that celebrities help to realize that this does not have to be done,
04:30that ludopathy is serious, that it affects many minors and adults,
04:34but today the focus is on minors,
04:36and that they can, with a counter-message, well, try to help.
04:40Ludopathy is a disease,
04:42it is really put on whole families,
04:44that they spend the money of the family's food,
04:47in this disease that they cannot handle.
04:49We know that, the majority.
04:52When the offer is so tempting,
04:54because it has happened to me that they offer me to do with legal sites,
04:57many celebrities do not try.
05:00They are personal decisions.
05:02It's a lot of money in dollars, right?
05:04It should be all legal, in any case,
05:06but that's another discussion, because it leaves a lot of money.
05:08Well.
05:09Now they went against the illegals,
05:11and it's so easy to check, I say.
05:13Of course, the issue is that there are no contracts.
05:15Between the company, which still has no detainees or identified,
05:18they are ghosts, there is the key,
05:20they contact agencies or representatives of celebrities,
05:23they pass the speech, and the celebrities speak.
05:26I asked yesterday, is there any detainee,
05:28that is the leader or owner of the platform?
05:30Nobody.
05:31Is there any identified?
05:32Nobody.
05:33And the celebrities, why?
05:34And because they are the ones who expose themselves.
05:36In other words, what are these bands?
05:37The agency with whom you speak, you close a contract.
05:39With whom you speak, with whom you close,
05:41to whom do you charge?
05:42Because an agency does not charge you.
05:44There is no contract.
05:45What?
05:46That is not charged.
05:47Of course.
05:48It is not charged, and also,
05:49there are many of these companies that want to make you bet,
05:52they write you on Instagram,
05:53on an Instagram account that seems very serious,
05:57but no, look, it would not seem strange to me ...
06:00Let's not talk about agency.
06:01Let's talk about handover.
06:02Of course.
06:03It is an Instagram account.
06:04In some cases there is an agency,
06:05in other cases it is directly with the representative
06:07or with the same celebrity.
06:08There are celebrities who do not have a representative.
06:10Today with social networks you have a direct relationship with the client.
06:12Obviously.
06:13Yes, what I say is,
06:14I think this is good to clarify.
06:15Yes.
06:16The penalty is from 3 to 6 years.
06:18To verify the necessary participant.
06:21It is already proven,
06:23because they are the ones who promote the application.
06:25From 3 to 6?
06:263 to 6 years.
06:27Years?
06:28I thought it was months.
06:29No, 3 to 6 years.
06:30Years.
06:31Necessary participant.
06:32So it is effective imprisonment.
06:33The issue is that, of course,
06:34as it is in limbo, there is less than 5,
06:37for those who do not have a record, it is imprisonable.
06:39For those who do not have a record.
06:41But it is punishable to go to comply with a sanction,
06:46in this case, to a penalty,
06:47or to go to prison.
06:48A learning.
06:49That is no longer done.
06:50The one who has a firm conviction,
06:53Elegante, for example,
06:55was sentenced to 3 years and 3 months in prison,
06:57suspended.
06:58It is not firm.
06:59If the conviction of Elegante was firm,
07:03we are going to put it in this case,
07:05the highest court, which is the Supreme Court,
07:07would confirm the conviction of Elegante,
07:09and he would be sentenced in this case,
07:11he would go to prison.
07:12Well.
Comments