00:00 [REPORTER] [INDISCERNIBLE]
00:04 [REPORTER] [INDISCERNIBLE]
00:08 [REPORTER] [INDISCERNIBLE]
00:12 [REPORTER] [INDISCERNIBLE]
00:16 [REPORTER] [INDISCERNIBLE]
00:20 [REPORTER] [INDISCERNIBLE]
00:24 [REPORTER] [INDISCERNIBLE]
00:28 [REPORTER] [INDISCERNIBLE]
00:32 [REPORTER]
00:36 [REPORTER]
00:40 [REPORTER]
00:44 [REPORTER]
00:48 [REPORTER]
00:52 [REPORTER]
00:56 The decision can have a big impact, a game changer to the AADK in assessing their responsibility and duties, which is to manage the aspects of recovery from the misuse of materials and medicines.
01:14 The big concept is to decriminalize, especially the aspects of misuse of materials.
01:25 This is not a case of 39B, this is not a matter of a sharp knife, this is a matter of a mistake in putting materials in the body, in a small quantum.
01:37 According to the practice now, without making a move, it will lead to additional police duties.
01:44 He must bring an open IP, then the prosecution ends in court.
01:49 If that happens, it ends up in prison.
01:52 In prison, the case of the court becomes more complicated, the police duty to open the IP is also a lot.
01:58 So if there is an element of decriminalization, it means that we have a system that is allowed through the Act of the Criminal Code, where those involved can continue to be given the opportunity to undergo treatment.
02:12 Especially cases that they come voluntarily.
02:15 If they come voluntarily, why punish them?
02:18 So we facilitate them.
02:20 That is the process, the real purpose behind the move.
02:25 www.Facebook.com/BritishCriminalCode
Comments