00:00I wish to also remind the counsel for both parties, as well as our fellow senator judges,
00:05including this representation, that while we may rigorously examine witnesses and test
00:11the credibility of their testimonies, we must refrain from resorting to a manner of questioning
00:16or to making declarations that elicit fear rather than candor.
00:22The chair therefore respectfully requests our distinguished colleagues, the counsels for the parties,
00:30including this representation, to exercise restraint expected of us.
00:36Problema po ba yun pagka hindi mo matandaan kung saan ka nagpunta sa China?
00:41Yung pagtatulong patungkol po sa China ay bahagi po ng pagkatetest ng kredibilidad po ng testigo.
00:47Wala naman nung usapin kung naging maagap yung po ng testigo na city assessor
00:52doon po sa pagsasagot po ng mga tanong patungkol po sa biyahe po sa China.
00:56Pero in very several instances, yung pong mismong mga honorable senator judges pa ho,
01:03yung nagbibigay ng dagdag informasyon, halimbawa yung pong pagpuntang Beijing
01:07at pag uwi mula sa Shanghai, doon lang po siya umamin doon sa mga particular pong detalyeng ito.
01:13Wala naman po sana nga debate kung agad-agad inamin ho mismo.
01:17So wala pong issue kare doon, na wala naman issue kapag nanggaling ka ng China.
01:27Yung pong pagpunta wala ho, pero ang malaki usapin po.
01:30Yung nakalimutan, gano'n?
01:32Hindi ho nagiging parang matapat.
01:34Magsisinungaling po ba kayo para kay Manasis Arcarpio?
01:37I took an oath as a witness and as a lawyer.
01:41Hindi po ako magsisinungaling.
01:43Magsisinungaling po ba kayo para kay Sarah Z. Duterte?
01:46Hindi rin po.
01:47No further questions.
01:48When you discover the amount that you are supposed to pay, 200,000 pesos for a single meal,
01:59naalala po, you said, ikaw mismo ay nagulat.
02:04Mr. Witness, yung tanong, ano po yung nakakagulat in spending 200,000 pesos for a single meal?
02:22Nagulat po ako, personally, dahil hindi naman po namin hini-expect na gano'n po kamahal yung babayaran po namin.
02:30Yan po ang mga sapatos na nakikita natin, yun po.
02:34Yes po.
02:35Lampas po ng sampu yan.
02:37Lampas po ng labing isa.
02:39Yes po.
02:40Tama po.
02:40At kung lumalabas kung 256,000, ang sinasabi yung sasampu yung miyembro,
02:50o 11 yung miyembro, 23,000 bawat bata na sapatos.
02:55Parang hindi yata nagtutugma yun.
03:00Ito po ba ay isang example ng simple at payak na pamumuhay?
03:07Maglibre ka ng sapatos ng lahat ng tao dyan?
03:11Prosecution, I'm warning you.
03:14I will not hide my disdain.
03:16I will not.
03:17I cannot.
03:19I cannot.
03:20Is it the prosecution's intention to make a parent relinquish their parental duty
03:31in terms of rearing their child in the way, in the manner they feel is the best
03:36to promote character, leadership, teamwork, just because one of the parent becomes a public official?
03:49That's not our point, Your Honor.
03:51The point is, Your Honor, our laws specifically states the appropriate manner a public official
03:59is supposed to conduct himself or herself.
04:01Yes.
04:01And I heard that, sir.
04:04And that's what we're raising here, Your Honor.
04:07Yes, sir.
04:08We have no quarrel about a parent supporting a child's inclination for sports.
04:15Thank you, sir.
04:16And to support sports development.
04:32You
