Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 7 minutes ago
The high court has been told Mohamed Al Fayed’s widow’s initial reluctance to believe sexual abuse allegations against her husband was “understandable” and did not represent her “considered view”.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00harrods is seeking to replace mohammed al faid's widow heinie waffenfaid and his daughters camilla faid and jasmine faid as
00:09executors of al faid's estate as part of a bid to get money to go towards compensation paid by the
00:16store to alleged victims
00:18in her initial response to harrods about the claims mrs waffenfaid said she did not believe any of the allegations
00:25against her husband were true
00:27and asked why her discount to the store had been revoked stephen motherly smith representing mrs waffenfaid and camilla told
00:36the court on wednesday in her witness statement she addresses why she made those comments and the fact it no
00:43longer represents her considerate view
00:45he said harrods's barrister had accepted those sentiments were readily understandable as an initial response soon after her husband's death
00:55the court has heard there are 320 women including former harrods employees making sexual abuse claims against the al faid
01:05estate both al faid's widow and some alleged victims were in the courtroom on wednesday
01:12lawyers for harrods argue mrs waffenfaid and her daughters are unable to properly deal with the sexual abuse claims against
01:21the estate and treat them dispassionately
01:23they argue the al faid is at risk of bankruptcy due to the pending claims

Recommended