Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 15 hours ago
Judge Judy's patience wears thin when a litigant challenges her over animal negligence and refuses to back down.

During a heated dispute involving a tragic accident, the woman claims to be an animal activist and argues that pets should receive the same legal protections as children. Judge Judy explains the distinction between animals and people under the law, but the confrontation only grows more contentious.

Watch Judge Judy for more unforgettable courtroom confrontations.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00You are so stupid. You are so stupid. And I have to, you know, sometimes, sometimes a judgment has
00:05to reflect the stupidity of a litigant. And while there is no cause of action, I'm going to hear
00:11her evidence with regard to your harassment. Because you're harassing me, and I'm not easily
00:18harassed. So I don't know what it is. I can tell you that you're no animal activist. Because an
00:26animal activist would understand that if you would be responsible for a four-year-old
00:31child, even though it was an accident, it happened under your watch.
00:36But animals are considered property.
00:37Shut up and listen.
00:39Animals are considered property in the state of California.
00:41Just a second. Well, that's what I said to you. I said if you were a real animal rights
00:45activist, you would not consider animals property.
00:49I don't, but the law does.
00:50That's what I just said to you. If you weren't so high on something, then perhaps you would
00:54understand.

Recommended