Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 minute ago
It’s one thing to change your story. It’s another when there’s surveillance video.

During a dispute over whether a dog was kept under control, the defendant’s version of events keeps shifting. Then Judge Yodit Tewolde watches the video evidence — and what she sees doesn’t match the testimony.

When the defendant tries to challenge what’s right there on screen instead of explaining the contradiction, Judge Tewolde’s patience wears thin.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:21I'm angry.
00:22OK.
00:23Do you know why I'm angry, Ms. Schilling?
00:25Because my jacket didn't get caught on the game.
00:27The jacket didn't get caught.
00:28I don't see a friend.
00:29And you did not drop.
00:31You dropped the leash before you even went in.
00:33You didn't rush over.
00:35And to hear his dog, Duke, in pain.
00:39You know, you didn't see the thing going on.
00:41And I do, I'm sorry about that.
00:43That is a credibility issue.
00:44You lied to me.

Recommended