Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 7 minutes ago
When Judge Tanya Acker learns that Mr. Maize paid just $300 for a non-working vehicle before putting a $3,400 price on it, she can’t help but point out the “spectacular profit” involved — especially considering the car doesn’t work.

The numbers come under scrutiny after a father and son sue Mr. Maize for the return of a $500 deposit on the project car.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00How much did you pay for this car?
00:01I actually paid $300 for the car.
00:03It has a book value of $1,613,
00:08and you sold it to this young gentleman for $3,400.
00:12Should I assume something nefarious or disingenuous
00:15because you made a spectacular profit on a car that does not work?
00:19No. I looked up similar vehicles and priced it accordingly to what I saw.
00:24My intentions were never to oversell the vehicle.
00:26All of my intentions were to look at what's out there and price it fairly.

Recommended